[sage-devel] Re: better way of distributing sagemath for debian/ubuntu

2010-02-04 Thread Frank Polte
The squashfs files are now uploaded to here: http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/frank/sagemath/squashfs/ Frank Polte -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more optio

[sage-devel] Re: better way of distributing sagemath for debian/ubuntu

2010-02-03 Thread Frank Polte
I made 2 new wiki pages: http://wiki.sagemath.org/SagemathLive http://wiki.sagemath.org/UsingSquashFS I hope this helps. On 3 Feb., 03:11, William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Frank Polte wrote: > > >> I use squashfs + unionfs for the virtualbox Sage distribution.  Do you > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: better way of distributing sagemath for debian/ubuntu

2010-02-02 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Frank Polte wrote: > > >> I use squashfs + unionfs for the virtualbox Sage distribution.  Do you >> ever use Virtualbox? >> It would be great if somebody else could take over the job (once ever >> 3 weeks) of updating the virtualbox image and rebuilding the >> squas

[sage-devel] Re: better way of distributing sagemath for debian/ubuntu

2010-02-02 Thread Frank Polte
> I use squashfs + unionfs for the virtualbox Sage distribution.  Do you > ever use Virtualbox? > It would be great if somebody else could take over the job (once ever > 3 weeks) of updating the virtualbox image and rebuilding the > squashfs+unionfs install, since I don't like doing it at all. If

Re: [sage-devel] Re: better way of distributing sagemath for debian/ubuntu

2010-02-02 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Frank Polte wrote: > > > On 2 Feb., 16:42, William Stein wrote: >> >> >> Quick note: 1.  I make squashfs for Sage, and if you do it right, it's >> 390MB.  You have to replace the spkg's by empty files. >> > That's right, I thought you need  the spks's to (re)compil

[sage-devel] Re: better way of distributing sagemath for debian/ubuntu

2010-02-02 Thread Frank Polte
On 2 Feb., 16:42, William Stein wrote: > > > Quick note: 1.  I make squashfs for Sage, and if you do it right, it's > 390MB.  You have to replace the spkg's by empty files. > That's right, I thought you need the spks's to (re)compile other packages? Then you can use sage from an old 512MB usb-s

Re: [sage-devel] Re: better way of distributing sagemath for debian/ubuntu

2010-02-02 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Harald Schilly wrote: > On Feb 2, 2:01 pm, Frank Polte wrote: >> Thanks for the quick answer. >> I will contact Harald Schilly. > > Hi, I read my name :) ... I don't understand what exactly you are > talking about. Distributing Sage as an Ubuntu binary takes 291MB.

[sage-devel] Re: better way of distributing sagemath for debian/ubuntu

2010-02-02 Thread Harald Schilly
On Feb 2, 2:01 pm, Frank Polte wrote: > Thanks for the quick answer. > I will contact Harald Schilly. Hi, I read my name :) ... I don't understand what exactly you are talking about. Distributing Sage as an Ubuntu binary takes 291MB. Your first posting said "This sqfs-file is about 639MB". So, in

[sage-devel] Re: better way of distributing sagemath for debian/ubuntu

2010-02-02 Thread Frank Polte
Thanks for the quick answer. I will contact Harald Schilly. On 30 Jan., 20:01, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > > Just to be sure I'm understanding you, the primary advantage of this   > vs. downloading a binary .tar is that its size is smaller (and perhaps   > it's quicker, though less standard, to mo