[sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

+1 circuitikz in jupiter Le jeudi 2 avril 2015 21:52:08 UTC+2, Daniel Krenn a écrit : > > The command > view(transducers.GrayCode()) > produces tikz-output which can be show by latex. In sagenb this was > shown directly inside the notebook, while in the ipython-notebook this > opens a new pd

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

Please everyone write Jupyter with "y" when talking about Project Jupyter and the Jupyter Notebook. Read "Where does the name come from" at: https://github.com/jupyter/design/wiki/Jupyter-Logo#where-does-the-name-come-from : ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

On 2015-11-03 12:50, Jean-Baptiste Priez wrote: > Hello tikz lovers!! > > I create a(nother) ticket to use tikz picture with jupiter > (http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19515 > ). +1 for making this work in jupiter > (I don't understand the reason of the tic

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 08:27:51 UTC, Jean-Baptiste Priez wrote: > > Thanks William. > > For what it's worth, >> >> view(transducers.GrayCode()) and show(transducers.GrayCode()) >> >> just work also in SageMathCloud -- example: >> >> >> https://cloud.sagemath.com/projects/4a5f0542-5873-4

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

Thanks William. For what it's worth, > > view(transducers.GrayCode()) and show(transducers.GrayCode()) > > just work also in SageMathCloud -- example: > > > https://cloud.sagemath.com/projects/4a5f0542-5873-4eed-a85c-a18c706e8bcd/files/support/2015-11-03-212108-tikz.sagews > > I finally added t

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Jean-Baptiste Priez wrote: > Hello tikz lovers!! > > I create a(nother) ticket to use tikz picture with jupiter ( > http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19515). > (I don't understand the reason of the ticket #18116 and it doesn't work > on my sage 6.9... ) > > For what

[sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

Hello tikz lovers!! I create a(nother) ticket to use tikz picture with jupiter ( http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19515). (I don't understand the reason of the ticket #18116 and it doesn't work on my sage 6.9... ) Le samedi 11 avril 2015 08:33:32 UTC+2, jplab a écrit : > > Hi! > > I just want to

[sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

Hi! I just want to say that this is a very nice feature!! Jean-Philippe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

2015-04-07 12:13 GMT-04:00 Volker Braun : > No, I'm saying its nice functionality but attached at the wrong place. If > you can't use .plot() to generate the graphics the how on earth is a new > user supposed to discover that functionality? Its just a terrible UI. > You're right about that! I gue

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

No, I'm saying its nice functionality but attached at the wrong place. If you can't use .plot() to generate the graphics the how on earth is a new user supposed to discover that functionality? Its just a terrible UI. On Tuesday, April 7, 2015 at 4:30:58 PM UTC+2, Viviane Pons wrote: > > > > 201

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

2015-04-03 4:05 GMT-04:00 Volker Braun : > On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 9:56:40 AM UTC+2, Daniel Krenn wrote: >> >> Actually, it is a short for >> view(latex(transducers.GrayCode())) > > > I know. And who cares? The important point is to present a uniform user > interface for generating graphical

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

On Friday, April 3, 2015 at 9:56:40 AM UTC+2, Daniel Krenn wrote: > > Actually, it is a short for > view(latex(transducers.GrayCode())) I know. And who cares? The important point is to present a uniform user interface for generating graphical output. The _latex_ method of transducers.Gray

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

Am 2015-04-03 um 01:27 schrieb Volker Braun: > I didn't even know that that was possible, yet another way to plot stuff > that is not accessible via plot()... > > There is no ticket for refactoring view() into something consistent > except for the awfully vague #18033. IMHO the finite state machin

[sage-devel] Re: ipython-notebook: show picture in notebook (e.g. latex-tikz)

I didn't even know that that was possible, yet another way to plot stuff that is not accessible via plot()... There is no ticket for refactoring view() into something consistent except for the awfully vague #18033. IMHO the finite state machines should go with the program and * Have plot() pro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Le 02/11/2014 23:36, Samuel Lelievre a écrit : 2014-11-02 08:35:25 UTC, tdumont: Le 23/10/2014 10:40, Volker Braun a écrit : > Did you run "make" after pulling the git branch? The zeromq and pyzmq > packages are new and need to be compiled. > > > On Thursday, Oc

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

2014-11-02 08:35:25 UTC, tdumont: > > Le 23/10/2014 10:40, Volker Braun a écrit : > > Did you run "make" after pulling the git branch? The zeromq and pyzmq > > packages are new and need to be compiled. > > > > > > On Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:57:46 AM UTC+1, Jori Mantysalo wrote: > > > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Le 23/10/2014 10:40, Volker Braun a écrit : Did you run "make" after pulling the git branch? The zeromq and pyzmq packages are new and need to be compiled. On Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:57:46 AM UTC+1, Jori Mantysalo wrote: On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Volker Braun wrote: > Its in 6.4.beta

Re: [sage-notebook] Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

> > > I think the lack of progress on sagenb is much more due to the > > *simultaneous* existence of the (for now, beta) Jupyter and SMC > projects. > > Nearly all effort that would have gone to sagenb has gone in those > > directions - and I'm not criticizing those projects, just recognizing

Re: [sage-notebook] Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:57 AM, kcrisman wrote: >> > Yup, we're a little behind... :) Trying to get 3.0 out before the end >> > of the year. The JupyterHub tool is more admin-oriented, so we don't >> > have a release date for it yet: people are using it for now straight out >> > of github, and u

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

> > > Yup, we're a little behind... :) Trying to get 3.0 out before the end > > of the year. The JupyterHub tool is more admin-oriented, so we don't > > have a release date for it yet: people are using it for now straight out > > of github, and until we feel that we have an API and model we re

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Volker Braun wrote: > > I think the mirroring is currently broken either due to the website > relayout or the boxen move. > Things seem to be back in order now. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Fernando Perez wrote: Yup, we're a little behind... :)  Trying to get 3.0 out before the end of the year. The JupyterHub tool is more admin-oriented, so we don't have a release date for it yet: people are using it for now straight out of github, and until we feel that we h

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Yup, we're a little behind... :) Trying to get 3.0 out before the end of the year. The JupyterHub tool is more admin-oriented, so we don't have a release date for it yet: people are using it for now straight out of github, and until we feel that we have an API and model we really like, it will lik

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Is the first release out yet? In August you said it would be October/November... On Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:02:29 PM UTC+1, Fernando Perez wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Volker Braun > wrote: > >> Currently it is single user only. > > > the multiuser support is a separate

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > Currently it is single user only. the multiuser support is a separate project that wraps the single user component: https://github.com/jupyter/jupyterhub Single-user application and multiuser authentication/management are not bundled into

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Currently it is single user only. On Thursday, October 23, 2014 1:20:57 PM UTC+1, Jori Mantysalo wrote: > > I got ipython to run. Looks nice. > > How is account management done with it? Ldap integration? > > -- > Jori Mäntysalo > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

I got ipython to run. Looks nice. How is account management done with it? Ldap integration? -- Jori Mäntysalo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sag

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

I think the mirroring is currently broken either due to the website relayout or the boxen move. On Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:42:58 AM UTC+1, Jori Mantysalo wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Volker Braun wrote: > > > Workaround is to run > > > > sage -f zeromqsage -f pyzmq > > sage -f ipyt

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Volker Braun wrote: Workaround is to run sage -f zeromqsage -f pyzmq sage -f ipython [Errno 104] Connection reset by peer I.e. sagemath.org stalled. Mirrors of those somewhere? -- Jori Mäntysalo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Ok, its a dependency bug: http://trac.sagemath.org/17202 Workaround is to run sage -f zeromq sage -f pyzmq sage -f ipython On Thursday, October 23, 2014 10:55:23 AM UTC+1, Jori Mantysalo wrote: > On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Volker Braun wrote: > > > Did you run "make" after pulling the git branch?

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Volker Braun wrote: Did you run "make" after pulling the git branch? The zeromq and pyzmq packages are new and need to be compiled. I did not. But no help from that: running configure Configure: Autodetecting ZMQ settings... Custom ZMQ dir: /home/jm58660/sage/l

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Did you run "make" after pulling the git branch? The zeromq and pyzmq packages are new and need to be compiled. On Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:57:46 AM UTC+1, Jori Mantysalo wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Volker Braun wrote: > > > Its in 6.4.beta6. Run with "sage --notebook=ipython" > > It s

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Volker Braun wrote: Its in 6.4.beta6. Run with "sage --notebook=ipython" It said that pyzmq is missing. Then sage -i pyzmq said that zmq.h was not found. (And last "yum whatprovides 'zmq.h'" found no matches...). A bug in pyzmq? (Might be, again, something wrong with m

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

On 22 October 2014 17:12, Volker Braun wrote: > Its in 6.4.beta6. Run with "sage --notebook=ipython" Thanks! John > > > On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 4:55:19 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote: >> >> I don't think that I have been paying attention. What is this >> "ipython notenook" and is it part

[sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook

Its in 6.4.beta6. Run with "sage --notebook=ipython" On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 4:55:19 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote: > > I don't think that I have been paying attention. What is this > "ipython notenook" and is it part of Sage? How does it relate to the > existing notebook? How do I run

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook in sage?

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Jean-Baptiste Priez wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to know what is the new line which is equivalent to > > %load_ext sage.misc.sage_extension >> > > with sage 6.2? > %load_ext sage should now work. > > The ticket #16050 (I think...) moved some code so... > >

[sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook in sage?

Hello, I would like to know what is the new line which is equivalent to %load_ext sage.misc.sage_extension > with sage 6.2? The ticket #16050 (I think...) moved some code so... Cheers, Jean-Baptiste Priez -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sag

[sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook in sage?

On 9/1/13 11:39 AM, William Stein wrote: What do Sage developers think about us including the two dependencies in Sage so that "sage -ipython notebook" just works? * the Tornado Web Server (http://www.tornadoweb.org/en/stable/) * zeromq and pyzmq This will give people using Sage more UI

[sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook in sage?

Am Sonntag, 1. September 2013 18:39:46 UTC+2 schrieb William: > > Hi, > > What do Sage developers think about us including the two dependencies > in Sage so that "sage -ipython notebook" just works? > > > First let me say that I'm very happy with the sage notebook although frequently using IPyt

[sage-devel] Re: ipython notebook in sage?

I think that would be great as in particular it will reduce sagecell dependencies that have to be handled by sagecell package at the moment or by the user installing extra optional packages. Having all UIs by default may also encourage features synchronization, e.g. making sure that interacts b