At some point you said that "this is what graphs should look like in Sage,
though they don't".
Well, it looks like the answer is named #14953 and has been waiting for a
review since ... 10 months :-P
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14953
Nathann
On Thursday, May 22, 2014 12:24:31 AM UTC+2, Wi
On 5/21/14, 13:21, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:18 AM, kcrisman wrote:
I'm about to give a very intro talk about graph theory in Sage, and
the graph database section [1] of the reference manual begins: "...
This class will also interface with the optional database package
con
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:25 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:52 AM, William Stein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm about to give a very intro talk about graph theory in Sage, and
>
> https://github.com/williamstein/sage2014/blob/master/lectures/2014-05-21/2014-05-21.pdf
And the scr
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:52 AM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm about to give a very intro talk about graph theory in Sage, and
https://github.com/williamstein/sage2014/blob/master/lectures/2014-05-21/2014-05-21.pdf
> the graph database section [1] of the reference manual begins: "...
> Thi
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:18 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>> I'm about to give a very intro talk about graph theory in Sage, and
>> the graph database section [1] of the reference manual begins: "...
>> This class will also interface with the optional database package
>> containing all unlabeled graphs wi
>
> I'm about to give a very intro talk about graph theory in Sage, and
> the graph database section [1] of the reference manual begins: "...
> This class will also interface with the optional database package
> containing all unlabeled graphs with 8 or fewer nodes."
>
> I can't find any optio
On Thursday, May 23, 2013 11:14:27 AM UTC+1, mmarco wrote:
> I guess that's the reason why it is not included as a standard
> package, right?
>
Yes.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiv
>From what i see in the nauty web page, its license is not GPL
compatible, since it forbids sale for profit or application with
nontrivial military significance.
I guess that's the reason why it is not included as a standard
package, right?
On 23 mayo, 08:00, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On 23 May 20
On 23 May 2013 13:52, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 5/23/13 12:34 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> can't the optional package nauty be used instead? Surely it can generate
>> all these graphs very quickly.
>
>
> Indeed, if all you are doing is generating the graphs, yes. The graph
> database allows you
On 5/23/13 12:34 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
can't the optional package nauty be used instead? Surely it can generate
all these graphs very quickly.
Indeed, if all you are doing is generating the graphs, yes. The graph
database allows you to quickly query for graphs based on a number of
differ
can't the optional package nauty be used instead? Surely it can generate
all these graphs very quickly.
On Thursday, 23 May 2013 00:54:54 UTC+8, William wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This page of the Sage documentation talks about "the optional database
> package containing all unlabeled graphs with 8 or
On 5/22/13 12:36 PM, kcrisman wrote:
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:54:54 PM UTC-4, William wrote:
Hi,
This page of the Sage documentation talks about "the optional database
package containing all unlabeled graphs with 8 or fewer nodes.":
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:54:54 PM UTC-4, William wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This page of the Sage documentation talks about "the optional database
> package containing all unlabeled graphs with 8 or fewer nodes.":
>
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/graphs/sage/graphs/graph_databas
13 matches
Mail list logo
