William Stein wrote:
>> I'm just going to make a call on this, so that the new matplotlib gets into
>> Sage ASAP.Jason's original proposal is:
>>
>> "So here's a proposal: Should Sage stop distributing a custom
>> matplotlibrc, and ignore matplotlibrc files that already exist in the
>> $DOT_S
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:28 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>>
>> Jason Grout wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, there is something to be said for what you said. We ship our own
>>> version of matplotlib, which mostly likely is different than the system
>>>
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> Jason Grout wrote:
>>
>> Well, there is something to be said for what you said. We ship our own
>> version of matplotlib, which mostly likely is different than the system
>> install. That means that their perfectly good default matplotli
On Jan 30, 10:46 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> Add a warnings handler which traps the Matplotlib deprecation
> warning. This handler will compare the matplotlibrc with the one that
> was distributed in the last release (maybe by checking a hash value).
> If it is identical (i.e., the user hasn't mod
Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Well, there is something to be said for what you said. We ship our own
> version of matplotlib, which mostly likely is different than the system
> install. That means that their perfectly good default matplotlibrc file
> might cause deprecation warnings for us. For t
William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Carl Witty wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:49 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Jason Grout
>>> wrote:
I just finished upgrading the matplotlib spkg to the newest version.
See http://trac.sagemath
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Carl Witty wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:49 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Jason Grout
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I just finished upgrading the matplotlib spkg to the newest version.
>>> See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/tick
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:49 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>>
>> I just finished upgrading the matplotlib spkg to the newest version.
>> See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4774
>>
>> This version of matplotlib deprecates some of th
John Hunter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>>> I *wish* matplotlib would replace their stupid deprecation warnings by
>>> something that just updates the matplotlibrc file, and say makes a
>>> copy of the old one. Is there any way we could catch the warnings an
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:49 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> I *wish* matplotlib would replace their stupid deprecation warnings by
>> something that just updates the matplotlibrc file, and say makes a
>> copy of the old one. Is there any way
William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> I just finished upgrading the matplotlib spkg to the newest version.
>> See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4774
>>
>> This version of matplotlib deprecates some of the constructs found in
>> Sage's matplot
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:49 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>>
>> I just finished upgrading the matplotlib spkg to the newest version.
>> See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4774
>>
>> This version of matplotlib deprecates some of th
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> I just finished upgrading the matplotlib spkg to the newest version.
> See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4774
>
> This version of matplotlib deprecates some of the constructs found in
> Sage's matplotlibrc (which is located in $
> So here's a proposal: Should Sage stop distributing a custom
> matplotlibrc, and ignore matplotlibrc files that already exist in the
> $DOT_SAGE directories?
I am +0, since I don't plot, but one could distribute a custom
matplotlibrc saying that it is no longer used and pointing to likely
l
14 matches
Mail list logo
