Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
GIven that this pops up again and again, and works on every other
platform (these are not tests with lots of rounding), is there any way
to get Solaris to compile the correct constant double for e?
I rushed my previous email about this, since I
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I've now completed all the doctests - there are no more numerical noise
failures at all, though some doc tests timed out, so it not
inconceivable there might be some more, but to the best of my knowledge,
those two numerical noise issues are the only two on Solaris.
If anyone has a spare minute, there are a coupler of tickets I created
for numerical noise issues on Solaris.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8375
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8374
They should not take long to review.
Dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to
GIven that this pops up again and again, and works on every other
platform (these are not tests with lots of rounding), is there any way
to get Solaris to compile the correct constant double for e?
On Feb 26, 2010, at 10:29 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
If anyone has a spare minute, there are a
On 26 February 2010 19:21, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
GIven that this pops up again and again, and works on every other platform
(these are not tests with lots of rounding), is there any way to get Solaris
to compile the correct constant double for e?
There are other
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
GIven that this pops up again and again, and works on every other
platform (these are not tests with lots of rounding), is there any way
to get Solaris to compile the correct constant double for e?
I rushed my previous email about this, since I had to leave to get a
