On 08/ 7/10 04:48 AM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
We're in the *very* early stages of developing a new doctesting API at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9224
Unifying sage-test and sage-ptest does make sense.
I'm not over-impressed with the current system. I've had tests fail with zero
fa
On 08/06/2010 04:41 AM, Simon King wrote:
> Let s be a string (e.g., a docstring containing tests). Is it possible
> to perform the analogue of "sage -t" on s without writing s into a
> file and running a sub-process "sage -t" on that file?
We're in the *very* early stages of developing a new doct
Hi!
Let s be a string (e.g., a docstring containing tests). Is it possible
to perform the analogue of "sage -t" on s without writing s into a
file and running a sub-process "sage -t" on that file?
Cheers,
Simon
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscrib
