On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:48:09PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> On 07/23/10 03:52 PM, Carl Witty wrote:
>> the>/dev/null 2>&1 means we don't get to see the actual compile error.
>>
>> It would be interesting, and perhaps informative, to see what the error was.
>>
> That's one of the "features"
On 07/23/10 03:52 PM, Carl Witty wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
I just tried to build Sage, and got a failure with building IML. See log
here.
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/iml-1.0.1.p12.log
As soon as I restarted "make" again, so the build com
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> I just tried to build Sage, and got a failure with building IML. See log
> here.
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/iml-1.0.1.p12.log
>
> As soon as I restarted "make" again, so the build completed ok.
Well, in the following
On 07/23/10 12:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 07/23/10 12:39 PM, François Bissey wrote:
While I'm not discounting a parallel make issue entirely, it doesn't
look
like a typical one. The failing .lo's include the first one to be
built in
a non-parallel build, so it seems unlikely that one woul
On 07/23/10 12:39 PM, François Bissey wrote:
While I'm not discounting a parallel make issue entirely, it doesn't look
like a typical one. The failing .lo's include the first one to be built in
a non-parallel build, so it seems unlikely that one would be suffering
from missing dependencies. (And
On 07/23/10 12:23 PM, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:06:24PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 07/23/10 11:59 AM, Fran?ois Bissey wrote:
I just tried to build Sage, and got a failure with building IML. See log
here.
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/iml-1.0.
> While I'm not discounting a parallel make issue entirely, it doesn't look
> like a typical one. The failing .lo's include the first one to be built in
> a non-parallel build, so it seems unlikely that one would be suffering
> from missing dependencies. (And there are no errors reporting missing
>
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:06:24PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> On 07/23/10 11:59 AM, Fran?ois Bissey wrote:
>>> I just tried to build Sage, and got a failure with building IML. See log
>>> here.
>>>
>>> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/iml-1.0.1.p12.log
>>>
>>> As soon as I restart
On 07/23/10 11:59 AM, François Bissey wrote:
I just tried to build Sage, and got a failure with building IML. See log
here.
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/iml-1.0.1.p12.log
As soon as I restarted "make" again, so the build completed ok.
On thing I did do, was reverse the order o
> I just tried to build Sage, and got a failure with building IML. See log
> here.
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/iml-1.0.1.p12.log
>
> As soon as I restarted "make" again, so the build completed ok.
>
>
> On thing I did do, was reverse the order of the list of items listed un
I just tried to build Sage, and got a failure with building IML. See log here.
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/iml-1.0.1.p12.log
As soon as I restarted "make" again, so the build completed ok.
On thing I did do, was reverse the order of the list of items listed under 'all'
in dep
11 matches
Mail list logo
