On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Philippe Saade wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Philippe Saade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi all !
>>>
>>> Is there a simple way to plot a graph with more than 1 edge going from
>>> a given vertice to anothe
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Philippe Saade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for pointing saunders' code to me !
> I had to change a line of code to make it work with Sage 3.1.1 :
>
> G = Graph(g, loops=True, multiedges=True)
>
> instead of
>
> G = Graph(g, loops=True, multiple_edges=Tru
I tried this again...
--
| SAGE Version 3.1.1, Release Date: 2008-08-17 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|
>
> By the way, I just looked at Wester's article (briefly), and it seems as if
> he missed inequalities. Such things, as, say, x+y<=3, x>=0, y>=0 for integer
> x and y, should be a part of the standard test, I think. [...]
> Can SAGE do that?
>
What would it mean to do that?
--~--~-~--
>> By the way, I just looked at Wester's article (briefly), and it seems as
>> if
>> he missed inequalities. Such things, as, say, x+y<=3, x>=0, y>=0 for
>> integer
>> x and y, should be a part of the standard test, I think. [...]
>> Can SAGE do that?
I meant to solve. The answer should be eith
I don't know the cause of your problem but the following works for me
sage: f1 = lambda x: jacobi("sn",x,1)
sage: f2 = lambda x: jacobi("sn",x,2)
sage: plot(f1,(x,-3,3))
sage: plot(f2,(x,-3,3))
and hopefully is at least a workaround.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Jason Merrill <[EMAIL PRO
Just curious, is there any support for, or any plans to support step
by step problem solving? I'm thinking of this tool:
http://calc101.com/webMathematica/derivatives.jsp
Which shows you that it first used the chain rule, then took the
second derivative, then used the quotient rule, etc. It mig
No, but you're welcome to implement it. Maybe implement it in SymPy
which is written in pure Python and included in Sage.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just curious, is there any support for, or any plans to support step
> by step problem solving? I'm thin
I now get it, when I said {1:{1:'hola'}... it understood {1:
{1:list('hola') and hence treated hola as a list.
I don't recall reading that one should input as a list if one selects
multiedges, at least I don't recall seeing an example with that
notation. This is, I think a little bit of a t
Hi,
Consider polynomials
f = 1 +t + 2*t^2
g=1+t
over R. = PolynomialRing(GF(7));
How to get the Latex expression of fg without expanding the product ?
ie (1 + t + 2 t^{2}) (1+t) .
latex( fg) returns
2 t^{3} + 3 t^{2} + 2 t + 1
Thanks in advance for any assistance!
I am using Sage 3.0,6.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Shing Hing Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Consider polynomials
> f = 1 +t + 2*t^2
> g=1+t
>
> over R. = PolynomialRing(GF(7));
>
> How to get the Latex expression of fg without expanding the product ?
> ie (1 + t + 2 t^{2}) (1+t) .
You can't do this
>> I came across this example in a recent thread in Maple newsgroup.
>
> Here is the link,
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.soft-sys.math.maple/browse_thread/thread/65248f258f5522ad?hl=en#
>
> Another link, to Mathematica newsgroup,
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.soft-sys.math.math
> How to get the Latex expression of fg without expanding the product ?
> ie (1 + t + 2 t^{2}) (1+t) .
Can't one use the Factorization class to do this? I tried
> fg = Factorization([(f,1), (g,1)])
and then you can print fg to latex. (I guess the point is that the
Factorization class doesn't enf
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Alec Mihailovs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> I came across this example in a recent thread in Maple newsgroup.
>>
>> Here is the link,
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.soft-sys.math.maple/browse_thread/thread/65248f258f5522ad?hl=en#
>>
>> Another link,
> What is your point?
Actually, I meant that more about Maplesoft. Sage support is usually good in
this group, just wasn't very good in this thread.
Alec
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe fr
David's solution is very clever -- but this is simpler:
'('+latex(f)+')('+latex(g)+')'
Admittedly rather inelegent!
John
2008/8/23 Shing Hing Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Consider polynomials
> f = 1 +t + 2*t^2
> g=1+t
>
> over R. = PolynomialRing(GF(7));
>
> How to get the Latex e
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Alec Mihailovs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> What is your point?
>
> Actually, I meant that more about Maplesoft. Sage support is usually good in
> this group, just wasn't very good in this thread.
I am sure many people have tried to fix your problem. Certainly
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Alec Mihailovs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> What is your point?
>>
>> Actually, I meant that more about Maplesoft. Sage support is usually good in
>> this group, just wasn't very go
Ondrej and William,
Thank you, it's nice to know about that.
Alec
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http
Thanks for all the replies!
Shing
On Aug 23, 9:28 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:50 PM, daveloeffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> How to get the Latex expression of fg without expanding the product ?
> >> ie (1 + t + 2 t^{2}) (1+t) .
>
> > Can't
>>> Actually, I meant that more about Maplesoft. Sage support is usually good in
>>> this group, just wasn't very good in this thread.
>>
>> I am sure many people have tried to fix your problem. Certainly I did,
>> I tried it in SymPy to see if it's easy for us to fix it, I found a
>> bug, I repor
Hi
Does anybody know where the **kwds are defined in Sage for the command
parametric_plot3d
(not counting those given by the definition
parametric_plot3d(f, urange, vrange=['4ti2-20061025', 'R-2.6.0',
'atlas-3.7.37', 'atlas-3.8.1', 'a..., plot_points='automatic', **kwds)
)
Thanks
Phi
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Philippe Saade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does anybody know where the **kwds are defined in Sage for the command
> parametric_plot3d
>
> (not counting those given by the definition
>
> parametric_plot3d(f, urange, vrange=['4ti2-20061025', 'R-2.6.0',
> 'a
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Philippe Saade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Philippe Saade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Does anybody know where the **kwds are defined in Sage for the command
>> parametric_plot3d
>>
>> (not counting those given by the
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Philippe Saade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 12:16 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anything that is not explicitly documented in parametric_plot3d should
>> just get passed on to show.
>>
>> -- William
>
> Ok ! I'll make my
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 12:16 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anything that is not explicitly documented in parametric_plot3d should
> just get passed on to show.
>
> -- William
Ok ! I'll make my documentation compliant with that advice.
But i've noticed that it is sometimes not
26 matches
Mail list logo
