On Nov 20, 8:23 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if that is possible -- let me know. It would be interesting.
Actually I found a better way to write an init.d script. It appears
that killing twistd shuts down the whole show.
Adding here on hopes useful to someone..
> I thought that this was going to be a part of the templating of the
> notebook. For whoever is doing that, how is it going? Would it be easy
> to add the tag at the top?
>
It will be easy to do that. Mike said he would review the notebook
tickets over the weekend. With templating I'm finding
William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Possible to change base notebook URL? e.g. localhost:8000/foo/bar ?
>>
>
> Unfortunately, this isn't supported yet, though it's certainly been requested
> before.
Indeed, see
http://groups
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 1:05 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Type notebook? and read the docs. If that isn't enough please please
>> do ask here again.
>
> The "Help" link inside the notebook gives a ton of gre
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Possible to change base notebook URL? e.g. localhost:8000/foo/bar ?
>
Unfortunately, this isn't supported yet, though it's certainly been requested
before.
William
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~-
Possible to change base notebook URL? e.g. localhost:8000/foo/bar ?
cs
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
ht
On Nov 20, 1:05 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Type notebook? and read the docs. If that isn't enough please please
> do ask here again.
The "Help" link inside the notebook gives a ton of great docs on how
to do great things with notebook. I couldn't find the section on how
to
> > Thanks a lot for that, Robert!
>
> Seehttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4572
Thanks to you from here too! This relieves yet another of the okay-
but-still-annoying things I've experienced in Sage. I can't import
the whole patch from here but just making the actual code change
worked
I am currently running Mathematica through wine on Ubuntu.
>From the command line:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ wine "C:\Program Files\Wolfram Research\Mathematica
\6.0\math.exe"
Mathematica 6.0 for Microsoft Windows (32-bit)
Copyright 1988-2008 Wolfram Research, Inc.
In[1]:=
And in /usr/bin/math
[EMAIL
Hi all,
I'm trying to exponentiate a matrix with a complex entry. The input
and output is below. Why does Sage give me 103993*I/33102 in the upper
right hand corner, and how can I get it to give me the right answer?
Also, how do I get it to use (eg.) RealField(100)?
Best, Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
On Nov 20, 2008, at 1:54 AM, Stan Schymanski wrote:
> Thanks a lot for that, Robert!
See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4572 Do you want to
review it?
> Is the ultimate "fix" the one that will
> use pynac instead of maxima? I can't wait for this one.
Yep, though we won't be replac
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How add new Sage notebook accounts so everyone doesn't have to log in
> as admin?
Type notebook? and read the docs. If that isn't enough please please
do ask here again.
>
> And, how kill Sage notebook? I run it
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Robert Bradshaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Simon King wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> assume that some function/method produces files on the disk. What
>> should a doc test look like for such functions/methods? Is there a
>> standa
How add new Sage notebook accounts so everyone doesn't have to log in
as admin?
And, how kill Sage notebook? I run it as a background process and it
seems to start a ton of processes. Perhaps there is a parent process
I can kill that will automatically cause rest to die?
Thanks,
Chris
--~--~-
Dear Robert,
On Nov 20, 9:10 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Simon King wrote:
> > But shouldn't the doc test of save_session be changed, using tempfile?
> > After all, if the user has a file 'session.sobj' in the current
> > directory, the doc test
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Robert Bradshaw
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Simon King wrote:
>
>>
>> Dear Robert,
>>
>> On Nov 20, 8:45 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
a) In what directory should the files be created? [Subdirecto
On Nov 20, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Simon King wrote:
>
> Dear Robert,
>
> On Nov 20, 8:45 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>> a) In what directory should the files be created? [Subdirectories
>>> of] SAGE_TMP perhaps?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> b) How can one avoid name conflicts with user
Dear Robert,
On Nov 20, 8:45 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > a) In what directory should the files be created? [Subdirectories
> > of] SAGE_TMP perhaps?
>
> Yes.
>
> > b) How can one avoid name conflicts with user data? E.g., in the doc
> > test for save_session, this point
On Nov 20, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> assume that some function/method produces files on the disk. What
> should a doc test look like for such functions/methods? Is there a
> standard? My fear is to have doc tests that destroy user data. I'd
> like to know your opinion
Hi folks,
assume that some function/method produces files on the disk. What
should a doc test look like for such functions/methods? Is there a
standard? My fear is to have doc tests that destroy user data. I'd
like to know your opinion on my concerns.
1. The doc test would produce a file, even t
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:51 AM, Stan Schymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm probably not the right one to respond to this one, but please, do!
> I get reminded of this every time I run through any of my worksheets,
> but then I usually get distracted by the results before I get to send
> o
Joshua Kantor wrote:
> In case anyone is interested there is a relatively standard algorithm
> for constructing mesh for an isosurfaces called marching cubes. For
> a while that was patented so there is a marching tetrahedrons analog
> but I think the patent issue is expired. Its complicated in t
In case anyone is interested there is a relatively standard algorithm
for constructing mesh for an isosurfaces called marching cubes. For
a while that was patented so there is a marching tetrahedrons analog
but I think the patent issue is expired. Its complicated in that there
are lots of things
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:21 AM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> > I am really newbie to Sage, but I need to both plot and declare
>> > functions like:
>> > f(x,y,z) = x*y*z
>> > and other poly's containing 3 variables.
>> > How do I do that?
>>
>
> It sounds like you are looking f
I know Stavros M saw it and Mike cc'd Robert D, so two of the
main maxima developers definitely know about it now.
Thanks again.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:00 AM, pong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, integral does not handle abs correctly.
>
> sage: integral(abs(x),x)
> integrate(abs(x), x)
Hi Jason,
Thanks for that. I still have a problem, as I use sage to derive a
complicated equation first, and then I need to get that function into
python. Say this function is called f, I tried the following:
import numpy
var('a b x')
f = a*x^2 + b
v = numpy.array([1,2,3])
w = numpy.array([4,5,6
Yes, integral does not handle abs correctly.
sage: integral(abs(x),x)
integrate(abs(x), x)
sage: integral(max(x,-x),x)
x^2/2
If that's for sure a bug coming from maxima, I hope someone it can be
reported to their bug list.
I can see that it has been reported by David to the maxima-user list,
bu
> What operating system *exactly*? What version of Sage? How
> did you install trac into Sage? And anything else useful about your
> setup that you can think of...
Redhat Fedora 8 with all current patches applied.
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.26.6-49.fc8
SAGE Version 3.1.4, Release Date: 20
Jason Grout wrote:
>> The last output is what I want, but I don't want to type the whole
>> equation in again. I am collecting all the methods and ideas that help
>> me and I hope that I will be able to put it all into a tutorial one
>> day.
>>
>
>
> You could use a pure python function, then.
>
> > I am really newbie to Sage, but I need to both plot and declare
> > functions like:
> > f(x,y,z) = x*y*z
> > and other poly's containing 3 variables.
> > How do I do that?
>
It sounds like you are looking for a 3-D implicit plot. Is that
correct? Or perhaps a contour plot in 3-D. Unfor
Stan Schymanski wrote:
> Thanks a lot for all your help! The [f(a=i,x=j,b=k) for i,j,k in zip
> (v,w,z)] way looks useful, as I can easily see what is inserted for
> what. Looking at the other examples, I realised that most of my time
> series are likely to be imported as numpy arrays, so I will h
Dear David,
On Nov 19, 9:02 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think bz2 is the smaller than tar.gz in general.
> You might try doing a few examples to see how they
> compare in the type of data you are compressing,
> to see if it makes a difference. I think decompressing tar.gz fi
On Nov 20, 2008, at 9:02 AM, HJ_dk wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am really newbie to Sage, but I need to both plot and declare
> functions like:
> f(x,y,z) = x*y*z
> and other poly's containing 3 variables.
> How do I do that?
>
> The plot3d-command seems like only accepting 2 variables.
>
Well, it isn't
Hi
I am really newbie to Sage, but I need to both plot and declare
functions like:
f(x,y,z) = x*y*z
and other poly's containing 3 variables.
How do I do that?
The plot3d-command seems like only accepting 2 variables.
plz help.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to th
Thanks a lot for all your help! The [f(a=i,x=j,b=k) for i,j,k in zip
(v,w,z)] way looks useful, as I can easily see what is inserted for
what. Looking at the other examples, I realised that most of my time
series are likely to be imported as numpy arrays, so I will have to
look in more detail at t
Dear Michael,
On Nov 19, 9:34 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> I think it is much more important to understand what the intended use
> here is instead of arguing about the finer details of compression.
Good point, although I think that the speed/memory issues pointed out
by
Thanks a lot for that, Robert! Is the ultimate "fix" the one that will
use pynac instead of maxima? I can't wait for this one.
All the best,
Stan
On Nov 19, 6:46 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2008, at 11:18 PM, Stan Schymanski wrote:
>
> > Hi Robert,
>
> > Will the
I'm probably not the right one to respond to this one, but please, do!
I get reminded of this every time I run through any of my worksheets,
but then I usually get distracted by the results before I get to send
out an email about it. Thanks for picking it up again!
Stan
On Nov 20, 6:46 am, mabsh
38 matches
Mail list logo
