Re: [sage-support] Current advice for generic SageMath install advice

2023-03-27 Thread Isuru Fernando
> I'm not sure that's quite enough. In my experience, sagelib needs rebuilding to interface with normaliz (I think it's "make normaliz pynormaliz" nowadays, or perhaps one needs a pip install). I would expect that the binary distribution of sage for conda is built without normaliz/pynormaliz

Re: [sage-support] Current advice for generic SageMath install advice

2023-03-27 Thread Nils Bruin
On Monday, 27 March 2023 at 17:47:54 UTC-7 Isuru Fernando wrote: We used to have separate architecture specific builds, but `sage` is now a meta-package that is architecture neutral (i.e. noarch). So, you get sage-9.8 for all architectures. We support sage-9.8 for the following OS and

Re: [sage-support] Current advice for generic SageMath install advice

2023-03-27 Thread Isuru Fernando
Hi, > However: https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/sage seems to indicate that various architecture-specific builds are woefully outdated: "noarch" seems to be on point, but the architecture-specific ones seem stuck on 9.2. Am I reading the info wrong? Obviously I don't want to point people to 9.2

Re: [sage-support] Current advice for generic SageMath install advice

2023-03-27 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 5:34 PM Nils Bruin wrote: > What would the current (Spring 2023) easiest instructions be for people to > install sage? I'm asking in support of an install-fest for students, so the > objective is to have easy solutions for giving students access on whatever > platform

[sage-support] Current advice for generic SageMath install advice

2023-03-27 Thread Nils Bruin
What would the current (Spring 2023) easiest instructions be for people to install sage? I'm asking in support of an install-fest for students, so the objective is to have easy solutions for giving students access on whatever platform they have available. I know about cloud-based solutions, so