* Rishabh Kumar [2022-07-27 09:32:26 -0600]:
> Does the Latest docker image contain sagemath9.6?
No. Latest is just 9.5 at the moment.
I'll try to build 9.6 and push it to docker hub.
julian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
Hi Joseph,
thanks for the notification. We had simply forgotten to update the sage
package. We are now in the process of providing the sage 9.6 package for
conda-forge at https://github.com/conda-forge/sage-feedstock/pull/77.
* Joseph Nasser [2022-07-11 11:54:04 -0700]:
> Is it possible to
Hi Ishai,
I don't know much about macOS but it seems that Apple Gatekeeper is not
letting you run SageMath. Apparently, it can be disabled:
https://its.uiowa.edu/support/article/4038
I have not tried but it might be that the SageMath distribution on
conda-forge has a proper developer ID set,
Hi,
* Chase Meadors [2020-06-22 15:08:11 -0700]:
> Is there some reason the Docker Hub repository is behind?
thanks for notifying us about this problem. Usually the Docker images
should just take a few hours after a tag is created.
A few prereleases and the 9.1 release did not show up due to
Hi Micheal,
could you share the output of `conda list` for that environment?
Feel free to open an issue for this at
https://github.com/conda-forge/sage-feedstock/issues as well.
julian
On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 6:04:23 PM UTC+1, Michael Boyle wrote:
>
> I followed the installation
Have you had a look at
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/numerical/sage/numerical/mip.html?
Seems to be what you want to do essentially.
julian
On Sunday, October 20, 2019 at 5:34:37 PM UTC+2, Santanu wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I have inequalities like these:
>
> 3 x1 + 5 x2 + 2 x3 + 5 x4 + 7
* Georgi Guninski gunin...@guninski.com [2013-11-14 12:01:44 +0200]:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 09:39:58AM +, John Cremona wrote:
On 14 November 2013 09:28, Georgi Guninski gunin...@guninski.com wrote:
This appears a bug to me:
sage:
,p2,x1)
%4 = 1
julian
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 05:22:59PM +0200, Julian Rüth wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if I understand what is counterintuitive about the results.
* Georgi Guninski gunin...@guninski.com [2012-09-18 16:55:37 +0300]:
sage: K.x1,x2,x3=PolynomialRing(QQ)
sage: p1=(x2-1
Hi,
I'm not sure if I understand what is counterintuitive about the results.
* Georgi Guninski gunin...@guninski.com [2012-09-18 16:55:37 +0300]:
sage: K.x1,x2,x3=PolynomialRing(QQ)
sage: p1=(x2-1)*(x3+2)
sage: p2=(x2-1)*(x3+3)
sage: p1.resultant(p2)
1
This is the resultant of p1 and p2
and is working nicely.
Should we report this error in any other place?
Thank you again,
Rafael
On Jul 25, 4:42 pm, Julian Rüth julian.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently, this is caused by a problem in degree() which is used in
polynomial(). In your example:
sage: pol2.degree(q)
0
sage
Apparently, this is caused by a problem in degree() which is used in
polynomial(). In your example:
sage: pol2.degree(q)
0
sage: pol2.degree(p)
3
You get the expected behavior if you bring q into pol2.parent()
explicitly:
sage: q=pol2.parent()(q)
sage: pol2.degree(q),pol2.polynomial(q)
(3,
11 matches
Mail list logo