[sage-support] Re: www.sagenb.org vs alpha.sagenb.org

2009-06-14 Thread Marky Marc
On Jun 14, 5:00 pm, William Stein wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Marky Marc wrote: > > > Hi, > > The two machines listed in the subject line seem to be running > > different versions of sage, viz. "4.0.1" and "4.0.rc0" respectively. > &

[sage-support] www.sagenb.org vs alpha.sagenb.org

2009-06-13 Thread Marky Marc
Hi, The two machines listed in the subject line seem to be running different versions of sage, viz. "4.0.1" and "4.0.rc0" respectively. Does the "alpha" machine run alpha versions of the software? Or is it a DEC alpha? How do the versions of sage on these machines reconcile with with the term "al

[sage-support] Re: "Usage Styles" and using scipy

2009-06-10 Thread Marky Marc
Wow, thanks for answering so many questions. On Jun 10, 4:03 am, Jason Grout wrote: > MarkyMarcwrote: > > Thanks for the many useful answers in this thread from several people. > > (And thanks for the book on Rubik's Cube, David Joyner ;-) > > > Now, once again please forgive these questions if

[sage-support] Re: "Usage Styles" and using scipy

2009-06-09 Thread Marky Marc
) F=exp(X) show(F/F) - On v3.2 on my machine the answer is shown as "1", but the sagenb.org server tells me it's e^{2*sqrt(kappa)} as though it were showing F*F. What's going on here? Thanks heaps, Marc On May 13, 5:52 am, David Joyner wrote: > On Tue, May

[sage-support] "Usage Styles" and using scipy

2009-05-12 Thread Marky Marc
Hi, I'm brand new to sage and have just read "Sage for Newbies". Thanks Ted kosan for that. I have several questions. Immediately I wanted to do some work with sage and am loath to just do maths without documenting things as I go. Thus I really want to know how to use "Usage Styles", which are me