On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jason Grout wrote:
>> I agree with you that we could (and should?) do a lot to support
>> graphics as an integral part of calculations. I've spent some time
>> thinking about it. If we used TinyMCE or some other editor, I
Jason Grout wrote:
> I agree with you that we could (and should?) do a lot to support
> graphics as an integral part of calculations. I've spent some time
> thinking about it. If we used TinyMCE or some other editor, I suppose
> we could have images in the input code. See
> http://tinymce.m
Tim Lahey wrote:
>
> On Dec 2, 2008, at 4:00 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>> That was discussed in the "Mathematica 7" thread and the conclusion
>> was that PIL (the Python image library) could do much of that
>> functionality. There is no reason not to include it per default in
>> Sage, but so far no one
On Dec 2, 2008, at 4:00 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>>
>
> That was discussed in the "Mathematica 7" thread and the conclusion
> was that PIL (the Python image library) could do much of that
> functionality. There is no reason not to include it per default in
> Sage, but so far no one has started the pro
On Dec 2, 12:56 pm, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
hi Tim,
> I was looking at a blog post on Mathematica's
> Image Processing features,
>
> http://blog.wolfram.com/2008/12/01/the-incredible-convenience-of-math...
>
> and realized that if the notebook supported the
> image input fea
