[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-24 Thread kcrisman
> > I would personally be fine with downloading *never* including the > revision history?  That would keep the interface simple. > > Would anybody not like that? -1 I could imagine a situation (e.g. for grading purposes, or recovering accidentally deleted things on a worksheet previously downlo

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-24 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:01 AM, kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Feb 24, 12:38 pm, Burcin Erocal wrote: >> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:21:47 -0800 (PST) >> >> >> >> mabshoff wrote: >> >> > On Feb 24, 9:17 am, kcrisman wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > > Just a last followup (ignoring the efficiency issues): >

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-24 Thread kcrisman
On Feb 24, 12:38 pm, Burcin Erocal wrote: > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:21:47 -0800 (PST) > > > > mabshoff wrote: > > > On Feb 24, 9:17 am, kcrisman wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Just a last followup (ignoring the efficiency issues): > > > > Would it be possible to add a "Download Latest Revision Only"

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-24 Thread Burcin Erocal
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:21:47 -0800 (PST) mabshoff wrote: > > > > On Feb 24, 9:17 am, kcrisman wrote: > > Hi, > > > Just a last followup (ignoring the efficiency issues): > > > > Would it be possible to add a "Download Latest Revision Only" option > > under "File..."  or "Download Text File

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-24 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 24, 9:17 am, kcrisman wrote: Hi, > Just a last followup (ignoring the efficiency issues): > > Would it be possible to add a "Download Latest Revision Only" option > under "File..."  or "Download Text File Only" or something like that > (which would still be accepted as an upload, of co

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-24 Thread kcrisman
Just a last followup (ignoring the efficiency issues): Would it be possible to add a "Download Latest Revision Only" option under "File..." or "Download Text File Only" or something like that (which would still be accepted as an upload, of course)? Even when one clicks "Text", it still prints a

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-16 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 16, 7:23 pm, kcrisman wrote: > > Maybe they contain the revision history?   That could make them big. > > Was just downloading one now and basically it just does > cd > into the appropriate directory and then > tar -jcf "name_of_file_downloaded" "number_of_that_worksheet" > which means i

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-16 Thread kcrisman
> Maybe they contain the revision history?   That could make them big. Was just downloading one now and basically it just does cd into the appropriate directory and then tar -jcf "name_of_file_downloaded" "number_of_that_worksheet" which means it is bzipping EVERYTHING, including all the snapshot

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-04 Thread kcrisman
> I consider it a bug too.  Can you open a ticket for it? This is now # 5177. - kcrisman --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-04 Thread Jason Grout
kcrisman wrote: > >> When you delete all output, does that actually delete the physical >> images in the cell directory? (You may not know, but someone can check). > > Not only does it not remove the physical images e.g. sage0.png, it > doesn't even remove the cell directories!!! My current wo

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-04 Thread kcrisman
> When you delete all output, does that actually delete the physical > images in the cell directory?  (You may not know, but someone can check). Not only does it not remove the physical images e.g. sage0.png, it doesn't even remove the cell directories!!! My current worksheet only has cells 4,

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-04 Thread Jason Grout
kcrisman wrote: > > >> Maybe they contain the revision history? That could make them big. > > They must do something like this, or at least it includes graphics > from the temp directory or something. > > I just tried a worksheet that had had some graphics in it. I deleted > those cells. T

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-04 Thread kcrisman
> Maybe they contain the revision history? That could make them big. They must do something like this, or at least it includes graphics from the temp directory or something. I just tried a worksheet that had had some graphics in it. I deleted those cells. The size of the download didn't go

[sage-support] Re: sws vs pdf

2009-02-02 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:10 PM, kcrisman wrote: > > This reminds me that this brought up another interesting question. > Why are the pdfs I generate sometimes significantly smaller than the > sws files? In general I would have thought that the various images > etc. and formatting would make the