RE: [SA-list] External check and error codes.

2002-11-21 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
It doens't matter, since you can trigger an alert for the code you want. Only exception is -999, this will ALWAYS give a down. dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mathew Shember Sent: Fri Nov 22 4:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: [SA-list] Update feature

2002-11-21 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
UPDATE does, the double click don't. dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Viktor Sokol Sent: Fri Nov 22 5:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] Update feature -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello salive,

RE: [SA-list] Remote NT Checks

2002-11-21 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
1722 is in the doc... 1722 The RPC server is unavailable. Do you have netbios access to the remote system? dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Geiser Sent: Fri Nov 22 12:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] Rem

[SA-list] Update feature

2002-11-21 Thread Viktor Sokol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello salive, Just to make sure if you click on "update" bottom or make a double click to recheck some service, its doesn`t rebuild html output, isnt it? - -- Best regards, Viktor mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -B

[SA-list] External check and error codes.

2002-11-21 Thread Mathew Shember
Ok some rather ignorant questions about external checks and error codes. Does it matter what they are? I am just trying to write 2 simple perl script that telnets to the sendmail mail server, checks the size of the queue and see what is the workload (uptime). I can return numbers but the exte

[SA-list] Remote NT Checks

2002-11-21 Thread Dan Geiser
Hello, Again, Well, I've worked my way through the documentation until I've reached page 44 of 74, the documentation on "Checks". I understand the Winsock and Ping checks intuitively. I'm trying to get the NT checks to work. At first I tried setting up an NT-type check for an "NT Service" and I

Re: [SA-list] Installing Servers Alive via Terminal Services

2002-11-21 Thread Dan Geiser
Brent, That's the scenario I am seeing. Our TS runs in 2-User Administrative Mode and I was able to install the program without difficulty and it appears to be running as expected. I don't get the system tray con but that's alright by me. >From reading the archives it sounds like when you are

RE: [SA-list] Installing Servers Alive via Terminal Services

2002-11-21 Thread Brent G. Ozar
Actually, it depends on the Terminal Services mode. If Terminal Services is installed in Administrator Mode (meaning only 2 users can be logged in simultaneously), then Windows doesn't map the home directories like that. You can install it just fine in Admin Mode. I office out of Houston, all

RE: [SA-list] Installing Servers Alive via Terminal Services

2002-11-21 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
The install will go fine in most cases. However you won't be able to run it. The installation will try to install some of the components in the SYSTEM32 directory, if you however install via a TS session this SYSTEM32 directory somehow becomes the persons home directory. And the application will fa

Re: [SA-list] Installing Servers Alive via Terminal Services

2002-11-21 Thread Roland Gaspar
I think it had to do with "desktop interactivity".. ie, when running in terminal services, as a service, you'd not be able to interact with ServersAlive... Roland Gaspar Tel.: (514) 398-7880 xt 8603 ICQ # 1355591 www.patlq.com/~roland >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/21/02

[SA-list] Installing Servers Alive via Terminal Services

2002-11-21 Thread Dan Geiser
Hello, All, I recently downloaded Servers Alive and I am beginning the evaluation process. I have installed it succesfully on my local Windows 2000 Professional but I haven't really got too much into the configuration process yet as I'm still reading the documentation. On page 7 of the document

RE: [SA-list] Perfmon problem when SA is running as a service

2002-11-21 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
check the doc for the meaning of the error number.. dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu Nov 21 6:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Perfmon problem when SA is running as a service error 1

RE: [SA-list] Perfmon problem when SA is running as a service

2002-11-21 Thread jean . werk
error 1219 Jean "Dirk Bulinckx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@woodstone.nu on 11/21/2002 04:27:58 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: [SA-list] Perfmon problem when SA is running as a service check the logfile for an error

RE: [SA-list] Dependencies

2002-11-21 Thread Yem, Scott
We have done this setup here, but remember, even though it is a bear to setup, once it is configured, you do not really have to visit it again.  It has a great level of granularity.  When the servers have redundant paths like in your example, I have the system monitor both switches, but then

RE: [SA-list] Dependencies

2002-11-21 Thread Jack Lyons
I think that is a good idea but a bear to setup.       Also, what about redundant paths.e.g.  We have 2 core switches.  Each core switch is attached to both switches on each floor.  So if one of the switches is down then everything else should be still be running.       Jack  

RE: [SA-list] Dependencies

2002-11-21 Thread Yem, Scott
This also could be done by setting the dependencies from your monitoring server out.  Obviously, all servers have to be reached by each point.  Set the dependencies so this relationship is there and you will get notified at what point the network / system breaks down.  We have this by settin

RE: [SA-list] Perfmon problem when SA is running as a service

2002-11-21 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
check the logfile for an errornumber. dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu Nov 21 4:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] Perfmon problem when SA is running as a service Hello all I've download t

[SA-list] Perfmon problem when SA is running as a service

2002-11-21 Thread jean . werk
Hello all I've download the latest version from Nov 20. Perfmon now works when SA is running as a service but only with the NT Domain administrator account. I've created a ServersAlive account in the NT domain with Domain Admin rights but this doesn't work. When clicking on "Select Perfmon counter

RE: [SA-list] Dependencies

2002-11-21 Thread Jack Lyons
Why don't you have script that constantly pings the gateway and if it can't ping the gateway it will shut the salive service down.  I think it could be down with a simple batch file: :start Ping -n 1 | find /I "TTL" If not errorlevel 1 goto start Net stop SALIVE Ping -n 1 | find /I

RE: [SA-list] FTP upload HTML files

2002-11-21 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
Good question...until now I've seen (in logfiles only) that the FTP upload sometimes refuses to work...but was never able to repro it. In v4 the FTP upload file be done by something completely different then in v3.x, just to solve that problem. Also if you send a message to the list remove the REA

RE: [SA-list] FTP upload HTML files

2002-11-21 Thread Vaes, Joep
Then why does it hang SA? -Original Message- From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 21 November 2002 13:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] FTP upload HTML files there is a timeout on it dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [SA-list] FTP upload HTML files

2002-11-21 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
there is a timeout on it dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vaes, Joep Sent: Thu Nov 21 1:48 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [SA-list] FTP upload HTML files Sometimes the ftp upload of our html files to our webserver does n

[SA-list] FTP upload HTML files

2002-11-21 Thread Vaes, Joep
Sometimes the ftp upload of our html files to our webserver does not succeed. Don't know why. The result is that SA hangs. Dirk, Is it possible to set a timeout on this upload? Joep Vaes © System developer / dept. of ISS Viasystems Mommers Echt Peutenweg 2 6101 VZ Echt The Netherlands Phone

RE: [SA-list] Dependencies

2002-11-21 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
Then ALL is ALL-entry... That's not something we're going to do...   dirk. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Garry ClarkeSent: Thu Nov 21 12:12 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [SA-list] Dependencies 'ALL' depend o

RE: [SA-list] Dependencies

2002-11-21 Thread Garry Clarke
'ALL' depend on single item (e.g. gateway ping)   -Original Message-From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 21 November 2002 10:52To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Dependencies How you can depend on ALL?     dirk. -Original Message-Fro

RE: [SA-list] Dependencies

2002-11-21 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
How you can depend on ALL?     dirk. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Garry ClarkeSent: Thu Nov 21 11:46 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: [SA-list] Dependencies I have 60 items being monited at the moment. If the monit

[SA-list] Dependencies

2002-11-21 Thread Garry Clarke
I have 60 items being monited at the moment. If the monitoring server gets disconnected from the network for whatever reason then it will start sending SMS messages saying that all of the monitored items are DOWN. Is there an easy way to configure SALIVE to not set these monitor jobs to down