Yeah, we've tended to put in on all boxes, regardless of whether they
require it. Never yet caused a problem (!)
Best wishes
Richard Temple
Networks Team Leader
Dynix
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
p +1494 777582
www.dynix.com
Just wanted to get a feel on which direction to take if I redevelop the SA
control portions in or out of Brent's system. I'd definitely want to use
.Net, and it sounds like that would work for folks.
Not to say that I'm going to do it...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
Yes to both
Doug Woznicki
-Original Message-
From: Mark Bradshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] SA Web
As an informal poll, how many folks on this list have already installed the
.Net framework on work ma
>As an informal poll, how many folks on this list have already installed the
>.Net framework on work machines, and how many are comfortable with doing
that?
Several workstations have it and most of the servers do too. The install is
very straight-forward without any hiccups. Be sure you get the
I haven't but can with no problem.
-Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Bradshaw
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SA-list] SA Web
>
>
> As an informal poll, how many folk
As an informal poll, how many folks on this list have already installed the
.Net framework on work machines, and how many are comfortable with doing
that?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Brent Ozar
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 9:15 AM
T
-- Original Message --
From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:03:07 -0500
>Is it going to implement SA control via the web interface, or just be a
>reporting tool?
I'm definitely not going to try to c
When i try and kill the perl process I get an 'acces denied' error.
It doesn;t happen every time SA Web is used, but is a concern.
Thanks
Chris
"Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@woodstone.nu on 04/02/2003
13:40:02
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Yes I used the same machine that Salive is running on using the hostname. See attached file.
Dirk Bulinckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And did you try it from the same machine as the one were Servers Alive is running? Using the same hostname or IP?
dirk.
-Original Message-From: [EMA
Is it going to implement SA control via the web interface, or just be a
reporting tool?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Brent Ozar
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 8:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] SA Web
>moving SAWeb
And
did you try it from the same machine as the one were Servers Alive is
running? Using the same hostname or IP?
dirk.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ahmed
HassanSent: Tue Feb 04 2:48 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
>moving SAWeb into ASP, but I think maybe Brent Ozar was heading in that
>direction. I don't want to duplicate efforts. Hey Brent, can you confirm
>or deny these rumors?
I can neither confirm nor deny that report. ;-) Yeah, seriously, I'm still on it. I
got slammed with a couple of surprise
Thanks for the response - Yes I can telnet to the server OK via port 3264.
Dirk Bulinckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A port 21 check in Servers Alive 3.3 is done as if it was a check for an FTP server, and what I can see from the log, is that a connection to the port is possible BUT that there is
You could also kill the perl process, but that's definitely a problem. I
never encountered it before, but anything's possible. I was considering
moving SAWeb into ASP, but I think maybe Brent Ozar was heading in that
direction. I don't want to duplicate efforts. Hey Brent, can you confirm
or de
yes we are planning to add more.
The purpose of NOT having it in the beta, is that people would report the
crashes and errors that way we can investiage and fix (or just error
handle).
dirk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Vaes, Joep
S
A port
21 check in Servers Alive 3.3 is done as if it was a check for an FTP server,
and what I can see from the log, is that a connection to the port is possible
BUT that there is no return. And for an FTP server check (port 21) Servers
Alive expects a correct FTP return.
You
can however
Hi All,
I've been having a problem with the SA Web add on for servers alive. I have
noticed that sometimes when this is being used the machine seems to hangs
and when checked the perl.exe process seems to be using a huge amount of
the CPU 95-100% which i can only fix by rebooting. This has affecte
Dirk,
are you plannign to improve error handling before the beta goes live?
After every error SA disappears. v3.3 did not !
Example. Open the hosts file (e.g. servers.txt in excel), next save the host
file in SA...
Cheers,
Joep Vaes ©
System developer / dept. of ISS
Viasystems Mommers Echt
I am trying to check the port status of ccMail [ports 21 & 3264] but Salive 3.3 indicates those ports are not opened - which is incorrect.
Below is the log entry for the check;
04 February 2003 08:48:19 Pinging Atlantis-RIRC04 February 2003 08:48:19 Ping to Atlantis-RIRC OK with a successrate of 10
19 matches
Mail list logo
