Title: Message
can
you see remote services on those hosts?
dirk.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Riley,
StephenSent: Tue Aug 26 9:53 PMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [SA-list] Trying to do an NT
process check
I'm
Title: Message
I'm
sorry, I should have stated, I tried both name and IP address, and get the same
error message. I tried on the same subnet, and on a different subnet
too.
Steve
-Original Message-From: Dirk Bulinckx
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:34
Title: Message
Try to
use the IP address instead of the name.
dirk.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Riley,
StephenSent: Tue Aug 26 5:01 PMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: [SA-list] Trying to do an NT process
check
I
ha
Title: Message
I have
tried this using version 4.0.1376 running on Windows NT 4.0 SP6a Server and also
running version 4.0.1490 running on Windows 2000 Professional
SP4.
If I
try to add a check for an NT process it works fine if I select an NT 4.0
machine, but if I chose a Windows 2000 ma
Looks like a good idea to me...
dirk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jonathan Marsden
Sent: Tue Aug 26 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Server 2003 and cross monitoring issues
ok...I will leave the XP workstation on
ok...I will leave the XP workstation on the network...but stop the SA
service entirely, and see if the server locks...if it doesn't, then I will
start the SA service with only a ping for the Win2k3 host, then keep adding
the other three checks for that server one at a time, until I make it lock
aga
If you now retry having the XP station ON the network but not checking (so
not running SA), does the lockup occure too?
If so, then the next step (in order to determine what is causing it) is to
put some of the checks (that are done towards the Win2K3 host) into
maintenance...
dirk.
-Origi
Possibly yes..
dirk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Peter Enzerink
Sent: Tue Aug 26 12:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] SNMP trap host
Okay.
Can I assume this feature will become richer in subsequent updates to
Se
Well done, it definitely helps.
-Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 5:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SA-list] Beta builds
>
>
> A lot of you have been asking about wha
agrees...would like to be able to monitor those devices that aren't
servers...UPS's...generators...AC units...anything that will return an SNMP
trap
Jon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Peter Enzerink
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:56 PM
To:
Dirk,
I am experiencing lockups twice a day...two times in a 24 hours period on
the average...
I have run the server for a week without SA...in fact, I ran it for months
without SA and never had a problem, the only time I rebooted it was on the
15th of the month, and that was just to "refresh" ev
11 matches
Mail list logo