RE: [SA-list]Beta LDAP COM

I am not sure which part of my comment you are questioning. To clarify we are doing a check without the COM that verifies, in effect, a successful SSL authenticated bind to an LDAP server. In your first response you said that adding a port selector wasn't all that it would take for the Beta LD

RE: [SA-list]Beta LDAP COM

Are you talking about LDAP with SSL? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RAISKIN,HOLLY (HP-Boise,ex1) Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 11:47 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [SA-list]Beta LDAP COM We found another way method to

RE: [SA-list] Feature request....

As said we can do a custom dev for it. Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 9:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request What about SA using the version of 'open

RE: [SA-list]Beta LDAP COM

We found another way method to verify the LDAP data we needed, so this COM is not a critical component for us. I assume adding LDAP encryption is pretty unlikelybut appreciate the information anyway! Thanks, Holly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [SA-list] Feature request....

What about SA using the version of 'open file dialog box' that recognizes Windows Web folders? Just a thought. Mike >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/04 03:09PM >>> hehe. I did say 'minor problem' Mike >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/04 03:01PM >>> Other option could be a custom dev (that's a payin

RE: [SA-list] Feature request....

hehe. I did say 'minor problem' Mike >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/04 03:01PM >>> Other option could be a custom dev (that's a paying service) with webDav added. Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook Sent: Monday, February

RE: [SA-list] Feature request....

Other option could be a custom dev (that's a paying service) with webDav added. Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 8:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request

RE: [SA-list] Feature request....

Thanks. If I get a solution working appropriately, I'll let you know. (for the archive...) Mike >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/04 02:34PM >>> The best is to use the command to exec after the interchange generation. Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: [SA-list] Feature request....

The best is to use the command to exec after the interchange generation. Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 8:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request Ok, Th

RE: [SA-list] Feature request....

Ok, That's perfectly understandable. Where would I put the external command to upload the html pages? The only places I've seen are after the interchange update, after the RRD update or as an alert. Isn't the last thing to run in each cycle the html output? Mike >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/04 0

RE: [SA-list] Feature request....

For me the point is that we can't add all to Servers Alive. That's one of the reason to have the external command as alert, that's one of the reasons to have external checks... Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook Sent: M

RE: [SA-list] Feature request....

I couldn't find one for Windows (did you find one?). I'm trying the client I wrote about and that seems to work, but it's one more thing to have running on the SA box. Mike >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/04 01:52PM >>> Why not use a commandline webdav uploader? Dirk. -Original Message

RE: [SA-list] Feature request....

Why not use a commandline webdav uploader? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 7:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request Absolutely. Here's more info: w

RE: [SA-list] Feature request....

Absolutely. Here's more info: www.webdav.org and a client that can be used to perform this (but it does FAR too much for WebDAV connectivity, if all you want to do is upload) http://www.southrivertech.com/products/webdrive/index.html Mike >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/04 01:21PM >>> And h

RE: [SA-list] Feature request....

And how besides FrontPage (IIS) supports webDAV? Is it an open protocol? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 7:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] Feature request I would l

[SA-list] Feature request....

I would like the ability to publish the generated web pages using WebDAV technology. I have a minor situation where FTP'ing the web server is not available, nor is a mapped drive solution. The Sever is however FrontPage enabled, which uses WebDAV connectivity. Michael Shook Business Continuity

[SA-list] SA install and WinME

I installed the new 4.1 on a WinME box that had been running a prior version successfully. The installer truncated all extended file names to the 8.3 version: MyHappyRunTime.dll became MYHAPP~1.DLL This occurred for at least a dozen or so files, including the .exe's in the salive folder. I rena

RE: [SA-list] Error in Salive log file

Have you installed/uninstalled any software...? Any Windows Updates taken place automatically...? Jamie Quelch Systems Support Engineer Triad Computer Services Limited [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.triaduk.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf O

RE: [SA-list] Error in Salive log file

Update to 4.1 and try again.. Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 5:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Error in Salive log file We are running 4.0.1376. -Original

RE: [SA-list] Error in Salive log file

We are running 4.0.1376. -Original Message- From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 9:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] Error in Salive log file What version of SA? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailt

[SA-list] NTLM webpage authentication

Hi, I'm looking for a couple of beta testers for a URL check that is able to use NTLM authentication for webpage (and not just for a proxy server). Mail me offlist for it. Dirk. To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the mess

RE: [SA-list] Error in Salive log file

What version of SA? Dirk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 4:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] Error in Salive log file I'm getting the following message in my log file: Mon

[SA-list] Error in Salive log file

I'm getting the following message in my log file: Monday, February 02, 2004 9:37:18 AM ERR entry_check 17(Corpdir-5): 5 (Invalid procedure call or argument) Everything has been working great until today. Any ideas or suggestions as to how I should proceed Rusty Tripp Levi Strauss & Co. To