I’ve installed 6.3.2366 and it does fix the issue.
Thank you,
Brett Hanson
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of
Dirk Bulinckx
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 11:31 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem adding people
New beta online…
Installer isn't yet acting correctly for the groups.grp and samib file.
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of
Dirk Bulinckx
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 6:03 PM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Problem addin
OK found the problem.
You "only" get it if you first add a PERSON for authentication and then want
also to add a person/team to an alert.
Next beta upload will hava a fix for it.
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of
Hanson, Brett
Sent: Monday, Mar
it shows that for some reason the "ID" of the person isn't converted to the
username. I'll have to check why (based on the files you send me)
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of
ian.g...@okieurope.com
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 4:32 PM
To: Servers
I was just modifying a few checks and found that when I try to add a person or
team to SMTP mail recipients, the person / team does not get added. I tried
using double click and by clicking the Add button.
Version 6.3.2364
Regards,
Brett Hanson
Systems Analyst,
Agrium Inc.
---
Some development - I realised that the failed check wasn't appearing in the
event log because it wasn't set to audit failed login attempts (doh!).
So, having enabled that, I've done two further tests. Note - this is on a
Windows 2003 server, with a check for an NT service that works whether I u
That does make sense…I think :-)
Could you send me (off list!) the entries file, a dump of the SA registry and
tell me what entries are giving the problems (UID of them, at least of one of
them)
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of
ian.g...@okie
Many moon’s ago and used Java as an engine. Long disused now...
I’m showing my SA age
Barry
From: ian.g...@okieurope.com [mailto:ian.g...@okieurope.com]
Sent: March-14-11 10:16 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb
Is there more than one version of SAW
Peal script actually...
From: Barry George
Sent: March-14-11 10:33 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb
Many moon’s ago and used Java as an engine. Long disused now...
I’m showing my SA age
Barry
From: ian.g...@okieurope.com [mailto:ian.g...@okie
No that wasn't possible with the original saWeb …
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of
Barry George
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 2:46 PM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] SAWeb
Correct me if I’m wrong but didn’t Mark’s SAweb
Is there more than one version of SAWeb? I was talking about the version built
in to SA itself - did Mark do a separate one?
Ian
_
Ian K Gray
OEL IS - European Infrastructure Support
Tel: +44 1236 502661
Mob: +44 7881 518854
Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit
From:
Sorry, don't know why I included the OID errors. Brainfreeze.
Using a server which fails, I've done a test looking at the security event log
of a server using "person" ID, and then again using "check" ID. The "check" ID
appears in the security log as a successful login. The "person" ID doesn't
Excellent, thanks.
_
Ian K Gray
OEL IS - European Infrastructure Support
Tel: +44 1236 502661
Mob: +44 7881 518854
Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit
From: "Dirk Bulinckx"
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Date: 14/03/2011 13:17
Subject: R
Correct me if I’m wrong but didn’t Mark’s SAweb allow for the
creation of host checks?.
For me as much integration of the GUI interface into a Web portal would be
ideal. This would allow for such things as mobile devices being able to
maintain and manipulate SA from anywhere.
I understan
That will be in builds 3265 and more recent…
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of
ian.g...@okieurope.com
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 12:46 PM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: [SA-list] Latest beta - user management
Really like the new u
If you look at how the authentication works, from a coding point of view, then
it works for all 4 Windows based check types or it doesn't :-)
If some are working and some are not in your setup, then I would suggest to
check for the username as it's seen on the remote system (should show the
f
An update to this - quite a few checks seem to be not working with the new
setup. I would suspect the syntax of the NTUserid I set in the person spec,
except that it *does* seem to be working on some checks!
Very strange.
Ian
_
Ian K Gray
OEL IS - European In
I agree that it should have some more "features".
If "the list" can give me some propositions, then we'll see what can be done.
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of
ian.g...@okieurope.com
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 1:01 PM
To: Servers Alive Discuss
The logging you show is mostly about MIB lookups (and this is due to the same
installer issue that causes the groups.grp not to be "moved" to the new
location).
When you get the access denied, can you see on the (remote)system what user is
being used for the login?
From: Servers Al
I'll have a look at this…
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of
ian.g...@okieurope.com
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 12:46 PM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: [SA-list] Latest beta - user management
Really like the new user management feat
(Sorry I seem to be flooding the list today!)
I've found a strange problem with the new user management stuff. It's working
fine with most of the checks I've changed so far, but one (a perfmon memory
check) only seems to work if I set the username within the check (as before).
If I use the cen
Hi Dirk,
I know you want to keep the built-in webserver/SAWeb functionality as
streamlined as possible, but would it be possible to have some limited template
or formatting capability for that? Even simply to the level of changing the
size/style of the font? (Having a Serif font for that page
Really like the new user management feature. One thing that is (potentially)
slightly confusing is the fact that when you set up a user as an SA person, and
use that person in a check, the original "password" field is still there,
although it seems to be ignored. (I know this *now* because I'm
Brett,
Thanks for this - the moved groups file would have caused me a lot of grief had
I not been expecting it.
I didn't experience the second problem though - my check times remained
unchanged.
Cheers,
Ian
_
Ian K Gray
OEL IS - European Infrastructure Su
24 matches
Mail list logo
