en the check fails???
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Shook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 7:39 AM
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Question re: type of alert...
We do use the dependecies for all of the higher level checks,
send it to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dirk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Gene Martinez
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SA-list] Question re: type of alert...
What are we missing?? What problems
What are we missing?? What problems when the check fails???
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Shook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 7:39 AM
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Question re: type of alert...
We do use the depe
Let's take it off-list that will make it quicker.
Dirk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Michael Shook
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Question re: type of alert...
Ok, i'm
D] On Behalf
Of Michael Shook
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Question re: type of alert...
I think you mean to create a rule in my email to filter out unwanted
messages? Thats a great idea, and will work for those alerts. Unfortunately,
most
ary 05, 2004 4:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Question re: type of alert...
I think you mean to create a rule in my email to filter out unwanted
messages? Thats a great idea, and will work for those alerts. Unfortunately,
most of the people use text messaging to get the alerts.
No I mean using the option as explained below of Servers Alive.
Dirk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Michael Shook
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list
gt;-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Michael Shook
>Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:16 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [SA-list] Question re: type of alert...
>
>Is it possible to have 2 different types of alert res
Title: RE: [SA-list] Question re: type of alert...
Could you not do what you want with dependencies? Have the base services alert admins and then have database services depend on the base that alert DBA's.
Thanks,
Rev. Kevin Madsen
Senior LAN Administrator / DBA
The HoneyBaked Ham Co
No I mean using the option as explained below of Servers Alive.
Dirk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Michael Shook
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Question re: type of alert...
I
AIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SA-list] Question re: type of alert...
Is it possible to have 2 different types of alert responses?
Here's what has been asked:
If the check fails due to a communication, time-out or other error = Alert
type #1 for net admins
If the check is sucessful in connecti
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Michael Shook
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SA-list] Question re: type of alert...
Is it possible to have 2 different types of alert responses?
Here's what has been a
Is it possible to have 2 different types of alert responses?
Here's what has been asked:
If the check fails due to a communication, time-out or other error = Alert type #1 for
net admins
If the check is sucessful in connecting, but fails the alert rule = Alert type #2 for
others
What I've bee
13 matches
Mail list logo
