Received SAM Revival issue 1 this morning and very nice it is too.
Really well presented and I think it'll settle down to be a really
readable mag over the next few issues. It's got the feeling of being
published during the SAM's peak (if you can call it that), rather than
in 2002...which eithe
> It's got the feeling of being
> published during the SAM's peak (if you can call it that), rather than
> in 2002...which either means Colin's a bit mad or he's just a bit into
> the SAM. I suspect both.
Both would be right :)
> Still, Colin tells me the description in white of the
> ports and b
Well, my original one (in 1990 ish) had the writing on as does my new(if you
can call it that) one :D. Im a winner :D.
I have to agree with Gavin, the whole look of the mag is great, alot of
thought has obviously gone into the design of it. Nice on Colin :)
A.
-Original Message-
From: [
I *really* hate to bring this up again, but I need to ask your
opinions...I'll paste the below and I'd be very interested in your
opinions either on or off list, especially if you've ever developed or
published SAM software in the past. It's in relation to the File Library
I'm putting together
I'm okay , do what you need to do, however please be aware that other
companys have some copyrights in some of my stuff
All I say is it has to include my name etc
C
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Gavin Smith
Sent: 15 August 2002 15:42
At 15:42 15/08/02, you wrote:
I *really* hate to bring this up again, but I need to ask your
opinions...I'll paste the below and I'd be very interested in your
opinions either on or off list, especially if you've ever developed or
published SAM software in the past. It's in relation to the File
> I've been a bit quiet lately but I thought I'd just chirp in - I support
> your plan Colin, copyrighted material retains copyright, but if no-one can
> be bothered to enforce it, even if you seek them out for two months, ignore
it.
Erm... the plan about the Copyright softw
At 17:03 15/08/02, you wrote:
> I've been a bit quiet lately but I thought I'd just chirp in - I support
> your plan Colin, copyrighted material retains copyright, but if no-one can
> be bothered to enforce it, even if you seek them out for two months, ignore
it.
Erm... th
On Thursday, August 15, 2002, at 05:12 pm, Howard Price wrote:
Gavin and the SC newsletter hasn't been eaten by giant
anteaters??!!! Don't believe you!
We were, it's just I was easier to digest and shit back out so here I am.
On Thursday, August 15, 2002, at 03:50 pm, Chris White wrote:
I'm okay , do what you need to do, however please be aware that other
companys have some copyrights in some of my stuff
All I say is it has to include my name etc
Well, the software would remain unchanged and there are columns in
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:42:07 +0100, Gavin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I *really* hate to bring this up again, but I need to ask your
> opinions...I'll paste the below and I'd be very interested in your
> opinions either on or off list, especially if you've ever developed or
> published S
For those who don't read it,
this months Linux Format includes SimCoupe in the feature on Emulators,
giving it almost a full page and some good press.
Huzzah!
Tim
12 matches
Mail list logo
