Hi,
I'm getting the following errors in /var/log/messages on Mandrake 9.0:
Oct 12 07:33:02 laptop nmbd[1736]: [2002/10/12 07:33:02, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(235)
Oct 12 07:33:02 laptop nmbd[1736]: find_response_record: response packet id
15760 received with no
I've read on usenet about using `smbpasswd -S' from the latest 2_2 to
get the MACHINE.SID of an existing PDC into the secrets.tdb of a
soon-to-become BDC. I've also noticed `net setlocalsid SID' in
alpha20. Is there any way to do the same on alpha18?
(I'm staying with alpha18 for now because,
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 02:17:39PM +0200, Massimiliano Mirra wrote:
(I'm staying with alpha18 for now because, for some reason, with
alpha20 the PDC just vanishes from the domain.)
I solved this, and in case someone else had the same problem, here's
the fix:
security = domain
An easier way to do this might be to install webmin (a web based gui for
linux admin) it can merge data with one click, and it's free!
www.webmin.com Good luck!
Thank You,
John Berry, Owner
Lantex Voice Data Systems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hi Jerry,
i just pulled an all-nighter doing a re-org of all our servers which gave me
an opportunity to clean things up.
Thi ngs went well with once expection; A clean install of RedHat 7.3 +
Samba 2.2.6 was an absolute fscking nightmare.
I could join the domain, wbinfo showed groups and
On a small Intranet (9 fixed client + some notebooks) we have decided to
switch the PDC over a more reliable Linux server, actually running Samba
2.2.5 + OpenLDAP 2.0.25.
To restructure the scenario, I've found very useful IDEALX's tools and
pwdump. All the users and machines accounts were
I have always used Freeswan although it is a trifle heavy.
http://openvpn.sourceforge.net/ looks very nice but I have not tried it yet.
-Original Message-
From: johnnybb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 October 2002 16:01
To: 'Ruben I Safir'; 'Justin Georgeson'
Cc: 'samba'
Subject:
On Samba-digest, Richard M. Shepard wrote
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:14:42 -0600 (MDT)
From: Robert M Shepard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] rpcclient error
I am setting up a linux box (redhat 7.3) to server as a printer server on
a windows NT
Hi,
If I need some Domain Users to have local Power Users privileges
what is the best way?
- convert the local Power Users group to a domain group on the PDC with
smbgroupedit -c... -td
Not really knowing the consequence of that change I refrained from
doing it. It seems (from searching
Hello.
I'm looking at the different ways to make printers available on a Linux
server available to Win 2K/XP clients. I already have Samba (v2.2.5)
providing network drives to Windows clients from this server.
What are the relative merits of Samba vs. LPR printing? It seems to me
that LPR
I have a Win98 machine with Russian file names. As suggested in many places, I put the
following into smb.conf:
client code page = 866
character set = KOI8-R
preserve case = yes
short preserve case = yes
default case = upper
case sensitive = yes
Still, the filenames as viewed from
Hello,
Actually I am having a
strange error where I hope you can help me:
As far as I know I think at
least Samba is configured right but I dont reach to connect from a
Windows machine to the samba (on RedHat) machine:
I tried to do following
things to see where the error is:
*
Good day!
We have a patent invention for Stockpiling Heat Insoles. The Stockpiling Heat Insoles
made by new stockpiling heat material and possesses points as listed below:
1) In winter, a pair of the Stockpiling Heat Insoles can keep warm and comfortable for
feet for 4 hours as soon as they
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I ran into was:
- getent would show only local groups
What about domain users ?
- Win2k workstations connecting would only come in as nobody
- shares would show up but double-clicking on a share would result in a
login dialog.
I
How do I set permissions for a share from windows xp? I only get
the You dont have permission to do this message from xp. The thing
is I have 5 shares that I want everybody in my office (6 users) to be able to
read and write to. What is
happening is that when a user creates a file on one
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Hmmm... can you run getent group and see if it keeps looping
over the same domain groups? Make sure that winbind enum [user|group]
are both enable (are by default).
OK. Please try this patch against 2.2.6rc3 (or rc2). This fixes the
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 15:43, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Well, we operate in 2 fundementally different modes: Winbind based
users are fixed in SID, and we set the UID/GID. Unix based users are
fixed in uid/gid and we allocate the SID.
I think this is what metze was meaning.
but it is the
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 15:40, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Yep, that sounds worthwhile. We could even just make it a timeout - and
finally put gencache to use :-). (mimir's generalised tdb cache).
We do **not** need timeouts!
remember that sid-uid mapping is written in
I really think that until the admin does not map the suers,
the unmapped uids shuld simply not be mapped, and an error sent into the
log
that's fine. ( that was the reason I wanted to seperate the storages of
the local domain stuff and the winbind domains, but it's not needed then)
(we may
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:58:18AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
17) Merge winbindd with current (more advanced) state of play in
APPLIANCE_HEAD
Can anyone enlighten to me as to what exactly that means? What
functionality was added, what fixes were applied, etc.?
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 07:20:44PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hola Eduardo,
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:24:11PM +, Eduardo Pérez Ureta wrote:
Why I can't create files bigger that 2GB using Debian sid with linux 2.4.19
smbfs as client and WinXP home as server?
Where's the
I've released an initial version of the tsig-gss dynamic DNS update
utility at http://www.samba.org/ftp/samba/tsig-gss/
Cheers, Tridge
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 09:00:17PM -0400, Green, Paul wrote:
HEAD has cli_dfs.c in the directory source/rpc_client.
2_2 and 3_0 have cli_dfs.c in the directory source/libsmb.
These file locations match source/Makefile.in *except* in 3_0, where it
claims that cli_dfs.c is in
At 15:57 13.10.2002 +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
But to use ldap as a central storage you have to solve how to handle
foreign or builtin/special SIDs!
yes the builtin SID's should only be shared between DC's.
maybe we shouldn't do lookup's on the central idmap that contain builtin SID's
and
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- Also, I wanted to be sure we always got correct uid-sid and sid-uid
mapping for the guest user. I wanted an NT ACL to be able to include
this 'well known' user, and have it behave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- Also, I wanted to be sure we always got correct uid-sid and sid-uid
mapping for the guest user. I wanted an NT ACL to be able to include
this 'well known' user, and have it behave as expected. While *most*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- Also, I wanted to be sure we always got correct uid-sid and sid-uid
mapping for the guest user. I wanted an NT ACL to be able to include
this 'well known' user, and have it behave as expected. While *most*
cases inside Samba now use just the
Those of you with win2000 based DNS servers might be interested to
know that I have just successfully sent a TSIG-GSS dynamic DNS update
to a win2000 server from a Linux box, using a kerberos ticket from MIT
kerberos. This is an important piece of the netbiosless support that
is being added to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I know why 'only algorithmic' mapping is a pain - we can't do migration
from NT, but why is adding algorithmic RIDs a problem here? (Other than
asthetics)
I do not really like the idea of mixing two approaches. Ok, you can
make reasonably sure
Hi all,
my last patch to the passdb subsystem makes changes to the PASSDB INTERFACE.
all passdb modules have to be updated, to run with the current HEAD code!
(witch will be merged to 3_0 after some testing)
-#define PASSDB_INTERFACE_VERSION 2
+#define PASSDB_INTERFACE_VERSION 3
metze
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I know why 'only algorithmic' mapping is a pain - we can't do migration
from NT, but why is adding algorithmic RIDs a problem here? (Other than
asthetics)
I do not really like the idea of mixing two approaches.
We have many of these problems already, but they get worse when
allocated RIDs are the norm, rather then the exception. Perhaps we
should move SID-uid and uid-SID stuff into a seperate module? This
was somthing we were looking at for the 'new SAM', but maybe we need it
sooner.
Simo Sorce wrote:
We have many of these problems already, but they get worse when
allocated RIDs are the norm, rather then the exception. Perhaps we
should move SID-uid and uid-SID stuff into a seperate module? This
was somthing we were looking at for the 'new SAM', but maybe
I think idmap is the right place. we should move it from nsswitch to an own
directory and make it plugable. (See Roadmap of 3_0: it is needed)
And let it map sid - u/gids and u/gids - sid.
Maybe let it hold two contexts:
1. for all trusted domains (and our domain if we are a member server)
At 14:02 12.10.2002 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Samba 3.0 is starting to be used in a lot of places, and I'm starting to
look into how we can best ensure we don't get bottlenecks in our
performance.
Metze has raised a number of issues with pdb_ldap:
- We do a Get_Pwnam() on every user - even
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 15:13, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
I think idmap is the right place. we should move it from nsswitch to an own
directory and make it plugable. (See Roadmap of 3_0: it is needed)
I'm not sure we need it to be pluggable, please explain the benefits.
And let it map
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 14:58, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
Isn't idmap the right place to go?
I think so. And I think we can construct one that makes sense for
admins. For example, we could contstruct an LDAP based one that uses
the uidNumber on the
On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 14:58, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
Isn't idmap the right place to go?
I think so. And I think we can construct one that makes sense for
admins. For example, we could contstruct an LDAP based one that uses
the uidNumber on the user's LDAP record.
I
Date: Mon Oct 14 03:00:14 2002
Author: jerry
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nsswitch
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv32103/nsswitch
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_2_2
winbindd_group.c winbindd_user.c
Log Message:
fix infinite looping in winbindd_getgrent()
Not see
Date: Mon Oct 14 03:01:17 2002
Author: jerry
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/nsswitch
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv32486/nsswitch
Modified Files:
Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD
winbindd_group.c winbindd_user.c
Log Message:
merge from SAMBA_2_2 to correct the infinite loop in
40 matches
Mail list logo
