Right. I have here a virgin XP pc working flawless with samba 2.2.6.
Currently I want to upgrade to samba 3.0.0.
If you can tell me what patches you suspect of being the cause, please
tell me, I have an unused XP machine to play with here and I will tell
you the results (for samba 2.2.6).
Bart
What I did say was that a DC is not a PDC. PDC/BDC is an NT4 thing.
ADS Servers and DC's are the same thing. You can have many DC's which
means they run ADS.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Don Bivens wrote:
Active Directory is not a "PDC". You have to forest prep and domain
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Brandon Lederer wrote:
> I Have a "nobody" account. However I didn't have that line in there, or
> rather it was commented out. So, I uncommented it, restarted samba and
> winbind to no avail. No luck with the magic crystal this time. So that
> we have a clear distinct cry
Ed,
We are successfully using hundreds XP's in various stages of updates with Samba
3.0 and ldap.
Here are some notes that made my life more pleasant. These were
sent to me by someone else on the list.
I generally got a "Procedure Number is out of range" error on the XP
client.
I eventually f
Message: 41
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 23:37:31 +0100
From: Marco RÃben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Samba] problems with cupsaddsmb
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kurt Pfeifle wrote:
security = share
Have you ever tried (like is suggested in the Samba HOWTO and the
cupsaddsmb man page) to use
When a Windows client attempts to browse shares on a Samba 3.0 server
authenticating against a Windows 2003 Active Directory domain, it
requests credentials. Typing in user name and password fails.
Basically, I can't see even see the shares.
If I give username/password for a user in smbpasswd, the
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 10:30, Don Bivens wrote:
> Yeah, the logs contain no apparent errors.
Then turn up the debug level. The usual 'samba has gone away' means
that Samba has crashed, but there is also the distinct possibility for
network glitches.
> I didn't trace anything. I
> certainly ca
Allen Bolderoff wrote:
Therefore the only way to get 2 x authentication servers instead of 1, I
will need to run 2x w2k servers with AD installed, working, and replicating.
this way if the PDC equivalent machine goes down, the other machine will
still handle authentication.
And the samba box wil
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 01:35, Robert Rati wrote:
> The account I'm testing with has the posixAccount attributes setup. I
> was able to get this to work on my test system running Red Hat 9.0 using
> authconfig, but the final server will be running Debian. Since Debian
> doesn't have authconfig,
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 03:11, Carl Weiss wrote:
> Ok if all your users have the same SID xxx-3000 they are not incrementing
> correctly in the add user script. I had this same problem when I wasn't
> correctly authenticating to the LDAP server I was in fact using the
> /etc/passwd file, and then usi
Hi folks
I hope someone might be able to shed some light on a problem that I am experiencing
with
a Samba server. I installed this server about 2 and a half years ago on a client's
site.
The server has been running fine. We are now experiencing two problems which according
to the client occured
Yeah, the logs contain no apparent errors. I didn't trace anything. I
certainly can do that if it will make the resolution apparent to someone.
I was hoping that this would be one of those "oh yeah.. that's known
issue xyz where you misconfigured/is being fixed/etc"
I'll get some logs.. and w
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 04:31, Joerg Pulz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> hi,
>
> i currently tried to setup a samba print server which uses cups as default
> printing system and for some special printers i want to use my own
> scripts.
>
> samba-3.0.0 is linked agains
There definitely is something odd with XP. I was able to join an XP
client to my organization's Samba 2.2.x domain, but had problems
thereafter. The signorseal patch was installed, and I tried other
tweaks as well. I suspect that installing Service Pack 1 or a patch
might have "broken" it -
Active Directory is not a "PDC". You have to forest prep and domain
prep against the Directory and then install Exchange. It works easiest
on the machine that hosts AD (assuming you only have one) but it can be
installed on a seperate box from the DC.
Thanks for your help Don, just to clar
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 09:45, Don Bivens wrote:
> I upgraded an old Samba 2.x install on Debian that I had at a customer
> location. Authentication to the PDC was via winbind. Everything worked
> fine in the past except the RAID died so I rebuilt the RAID, copied over
> the old volume, and ran
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 04:50, Tony Caddies wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been looking at Samba 3.0 with a view to an eventual upgrade to help us meet
> some new security requirements. I've downloaded and compiled the source on the
> target machine. A test user account has been created and stored usi
Active Directory is not a "PDC". You have to forest prep and domain
prep against the Directory and then install Exchange. It works easiest
on the machine that hosts AD (assuming you only have one) but it can be
installed on a seperate box from the DC.
Allen Bolderoff wrote:
So, E2k requires
This seems quite common. I have an associate that can join the machine
to the domain but can't login with XP. Window 200 works fine and yes
all the registry patches are in.
I suggest there might be something screwy with 3.0.0. and XP.
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 05:52, kyle wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2
E2K requires W2K
Allen Bolderoff wrote:
I have been asked to set up a customer with Exchange 2000.
I have tried to convert them, so please don't suggest it.
We have 3 boxes we can use to do this with.
We want to use Samba 3 as the PDC (ldap backend) and Samba 3 as BDC (ldap
backend), with the
I upgraded an old Samba 2.x install on Debian that I had at a customer
location. Authentication to the PDC was via winbind. Everything worked
fine in the past except the RAID died so I rebuilt the RAID, copied over
the old volume, and ran apt-get update && apt-get upgrade. Now I have
some re
Kurt Pfeifle wrote:
>> security = share
>
> Have you ever tried (like is suggested in the Samba HOWTO and the
> cupsaddsmb man page) to use
>
> security = user
I had this setting bevore, but never tried to start cupsaddsmb with this
setting. Now ist runs without any error messages
"Zimler Attila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
>
> I tried to upgrade samba on a Linux from 2.2.8a to 3.0.0, and after the
> upgrade the printer sharing fails. I would like to participate in the
> search for the bug (if it is a bug), but I don't know how to start
I have been asked to set up a customer with Exchange 2000.
I have tried to convert them, so please don't suggest it.
We have 3 boxes we can use to do this with.
We want to use Samba 3 as the PDC (ldap backend) and Samba 3 as BDC (ldap
backend), with the exchange box as a domain member.
Will thi
I upgraded an old Samba 2.x install on Debian that I had at a customer
location. Authentication to the PDC was via winbind. Everything worked
fine in the past except the RAID died so I rebuilt the RAID, copied over
the old volume, and ran apt-get update && apt-get upgrade. Now I have
some re
Hi!, is there a way to remove the active directory support from a Samba
installation? I tried modifiying the smb.conf file, but I still cannot
authenticate against the standalone server.
Must I recompile? Or just need to modify other files?
Regards, and thanks in advance.
-eduardo s.m.
--
To un
[Samba] problems with cupsaddsmb
* To: samba at listsdotsambadotorg
* Subject: [Samba] problems with cupsaddsmb
* From: Marco RÃben
* Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:15:39 +0100
Hi!
I'm using Suse 9.0 with cups 1.1.19 and Samba 3.0. I'm trying to share
my printer on the network. Testpa
Hi!
I'm using Suse 9.0 with cups 1.1.19 and Samba 3.0. I'm trying to share
my printer on the network. Testparm runs without errors and I can see my
printer in the network neighborhood. So the smb.conf should be fine.
But when I try to install the driver with cupsaddsmb I get the following
error.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan Johnson wrote:
| Saw that a new version (12 Nov) of Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf was
| posted on the docs page. It's missing the Table of Contents.
|
| 23 Sep version has the TOC. It's also somewhat larger (462pp); has
| something been removed fr
I created a brand new nt 4.0 server with exchange 5.5 server in my samba
3.0 pdc domain with no problems. The exchange server runs fine under
the samba 3.0 pdc, but when I try to install exchange 5.5 sp4 on the
exchange server the service pack gives me an Dr. Watson error. The
exchange service pa
I Have a "nobody" account. However I didn't have that line in there, or
rather it was commented out. So, I uncommented it, restarted samba and
winbind to no avail. No luck with the magic crystal this time. So that
we have a clear distinct crystal, I will paste my smb.conf file. My bad.
Comm
Saw that a new version (12 Nov) of Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf was
posted on the docs page. It's missing the Table of Contents.
23 Sep version has the TOC. It's also somewhat larger (462pp); has
something been removed from the 12 Nov version (404pp)?
link: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOW
Should have add this to my previous email
security = domain
workgroup = DOMAIN
os level = 2
time server = Yes
unix extensions = Yes
encrypt passwords = Yes
map to guest = Bad User
log level = 1
syslog = 0
printing = CUPS
[Samba] printing / printcap name in samba-3.0.0 BUG
* To: samba at sambadotorg
* Subject: [Samba] printing / printcap name in samba-3.0.0 BUG
* From: Joerg Pulz
* Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:31:12 +0100 (CET)
hi,
i currently tried to setup a samba print server which uses cups as def
I'm using
SUSE linux 2.4.19-4GB
samba-client-2.2.5-226
pam_smb-1.1.6-371
My goal is to configure a Linux desktop into a windows domain environment.
So far I have managed to configure pam_smb to authenticate users to the PDC.
So thats good.
Now the problem is when user tries to browse a share.
At
Hey there. I've been using Samba for a long time, both at work and at
home. It's solved more problems for me than I can remember, and has
always been a pleasure to work with.
I'm going to re-work my home network a little, and I think I'm going
to be using LDAP and Samba3 to make my main Li
Hi list,
I have the problem, that a samba 2.2.8a server cannot validate the
password with a samba 3.0 pdc for a client request. A samba 2.2.1 works
fine. Let me explain the situation in more detail:
samba 3.0 pdc machine a
samba 2.2.8a server machine b (doesn't work)
samba 2.2.1 server mach
Hi again,
In a other manual (http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/smb-ldap-3-howto.html)
they write that there must exist a user with uid =0 that meens at the end
JUST ROOT OR UID=0 can join w2k client into a domain.
In the [SAMBA_3_0] and [HEAD] only a few basic entries are required: nobody
and a
hello guyz!
someone can help me for found documentation about samba+cript+pam_tally...
Is possible to use pam_tally + cripted authorizations??
thanks !
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi all,
The documentation for SWAT indicates that logging in as the "root"
user will allow the user to update & change Samba parameters. The question
I have is, does SWAT define "root" on a Solaris 8 system as "a user with
user id 0", or "a user with the user name root"? The rea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks, I'm at a dead end on this one. I really have no clue where to
go from here.
Any advice?
Sean Kennedy wrote:
Symptoms:
Unable to change permissions from win2k clients on folders/shares. When
change is attempted, they are silently ignore
Hello,
I've been looking at Samba 3.0 with a view to an eventual upgrade to help us meet some
new security requirements. I've downloaded and compiled the source on the target
machine. A test user account has been created and stored using a tdb file.
I have set and verified the following using
Hi, i can only answer to one thing,
if no windows is involved you havent to use smb at all, for mount files via
network.
But i remember that i had to use it with a Linux Coldfusion setup, cause the
cold fusion server
was not able to handle nfs shares.
I think i depends deep in what you want to do w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
i currently tried to setup a samba print server which uses cups as default
printing system and for some special printers i want to use my own
scripts.
samba-3.0.0 is linked against libcups and printing via cups and the
driver download works perfe
Hi,
I'm sorry if this is a very FAQ, I've been googling around and searchin'
the list archive and I'll gladly accept RTFMs with somehow precise URLs
(including URLs to the list archives).
I'm on the drawing board (no equipment yet) for a server farm that will
have a SteelEye linux cluster behi
Hello,
I thought I had this all figured out but I don't. I have a RedHat 8
system using LDAP 2.1.23 as backend to Samba 3.0.0. I wasn't able to get
machines to join the domain so I used the debug option in slapd -d 10 to
see what Samba was sending the LDAP server.
It looked like it was resolving
Is it possible to assign a comment to the workgroup/Domains name that is displayed in
the network neighborhood? Can I assign it throught the smb.conf file? if so how? or
can I manually insert it into the wins.dat/browse.dat as a static entry? if so how?
I currently vpn approx 6 domains. it w
Jerry,
Thanks for taking the time to respond. Yes, I also suspect that this is a
problem with the sending Mac server simply dropping the file. Both are
Samba, of course, but I think that the Mac might do some unusual things
when it tries to write the file, including creating a .DS_Store file, as
Ok if all your users have the same SID xxx-3000 they are not incrementing
correctly in the add user script. I had this same problem when I wasn't
correctly authenticating to the LDAP server I was in fact using the
/etc/passwd file, and then using the same test user accounts that I had on
the box, i
Hi!
I tried to find an answer to this question but failed to do so.
Do you have to use the "add machine script" while using LDAP or should Samba
add the machine by itself? My samba fails to do so and if I use the add
machine script I need to add a new computer (w2k) to the domain twice. The
Hi all,
i have a strange problem using samba3 with ldap.
it all works fine except dealing with groups.
example:
user frank is in the group admin and the group admin have "rwx" on directory test. all
works fine
i delete user frank from the group admin, but on the windows-station he can still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dirk Broodryk wrote:
| I am running samba 2.2.7a on 9.1 p4 2400
...
| Mainly I have two problems.. and it doesn't matter what
| I do.. I can't get it fixed.. Mangement is at to point of
| discarding the samba server and going back to NT wich
| I am try
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francisco Ruiz wrote:
| Thanks guys. Next problem joining the domain went well
| as per you directions, but when I configure my win2k
| machine at start up to log on the domain I get this error
| message " The system can not log you on due to the
| fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi. I'm converting a group that was using Mac OS
| X Server (we were dissatisfied) to Mandrake PPC
| Linux with Samba. The Mandrake-supplied package is
| version 2.2.7a-8mdk. So far it works great - but
| we have a serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
|> ...but i will try one more time ask :-)
|> There is one more thing, when install "HP DeskJet
|> 1120c Printer" driver, on windows client when trying
|> to select "Default Print Settings", from "Properties"
|> Tab, i've got me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kall, Bruce A. wrote:
| It is my understanding that if you have a wildcard
| in smbusers, it should only apply this if the
| particular users is not in your /etc/password file.
| Is this true? It appears like samba is rolling
| down the smbusers file
The account I'm testing with has the posixAccount attributes setup. I
was able to get this to work on my test system running Red Hat 9.0 using
authconfig, but the final server will be running Debian. Since Debian
doesn't have authconfig, do you know which config files authconfig
touches so I
Hi,
I tried to upgrade samba on a Linux from 2.2.8a to 3.0.0, and after the
upgrade the printer sharing fails. I would like to participate in the
search for the bug (if it is a bug), but I don't know how to start.
If this is not a bug I would like to know why not, and how to work
around, that t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm dropping in late here, so apologies if I recover any
ground already discussed,
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
|> A CVS tree is a good idea, but hosting on samba.org
|> is rather difficult. If you can get a sourceforge (or
|> similar) account, then yo
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:08:07 +0200
Bart Bekker wrote:
> Sounds like a typical misstake; did you apply the signorseal patch in
> the windows xp registry?
>
> from the how-to I quote:
>
> To join a Samba Domain, you will need to first make the following
> changes to your registry and reboot:
>
Hello,
Is it really possible that just the user root with the samba password can
join workstations into the domain?
I have also some other users who are domain administrator, but with this
users i can't join any workstations into the domain.
This is mor me a important security point, because I
Hi folks :-)
I'm just installing a fresh new samba server, and trying to authenticate
some win xp machines. The config is more or less like this :
* Windows XP SP1 with all security upgrades
* Samba 3.0.0final-1 running on debian testing
I'm more or less following this howto :
http://hr.uoregon
Hi list,
I have the problem, that a samba 2.2.8a server cannot validate the
password with a samba 3.0 pdc for a client request. A samba 2.2.1 works
fine. Let me explain the situation in more detail:
samba 3.0 pdc machine a
samba 2.2.8a server machine b (doesn't work)
samba 2.2.1 server mach
hi:
thanks a lot for ur help!!
i will use "HQ master ldap" + "slave branch ldap" as our
toplogy. i try to google at internet, and found that openldap
2.2beta now has "sync-based replication". i also found the pdf
file of ibm explain this at
http://www.openldap.org/conf/odd-wien-2003/jong.pdf
Well people, I found my own problem. You'll find the key to the solution
near the bottom of my message. Notice the Bcast mask on all of the
interfaces except the lo interface. The Bcast mask does not match the
address. e.g. addr:10.2.1.3 Bcast:10.3.255.255. I found that the person
who set up this
Hi guys and girls,
I run a Samba-3.0 PDC for about 30 N.T. workstations on a Slackware
Linux box. I often see the following error in the N.T. workstation's
event log:
Changing machine account password for account "x$" failed with the
following error:
The handle is invalid.
I'm not using PAM in
Hi Gerry,
I can't remember if I replied to this ( I'm afraid real life got in the
way a bit ).
This patch works fine, I can now set the share permissions properly from
remote clients.
Many thanks for this !
Cheers,
Eamonn
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 17:11, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -BEGIN P
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 22:44, patrick foure wrote:
> Summary:
> We cannot connect multiple users from an win2K/tse box to a samba server
> using password server authentication .
>
> Details:
> We have samba 2.2.8a on Sun Solaris , connected with an w2k/tse .
> Samba has been configured to check us
Summary:
We cannot connect multiple users from an win2K/tse box to a samba server
using password server authentication .
Details:
We have samba 2.2.8a on Sun Solaris , connected with an w2k/tse .
Samba has been configured to check user/password using an "password
server" on the network ( Domain
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 19:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>i see. thanks for the hint!! so just configure each samba
> >>as PDC, right?
> >
> > Yep. There is a small hitch in the way the replication works, I'll have
> > a patch in CVS fairly soon, so watch out for it and update before you
>
>>i see. thanks for the hint!! so just configure each samba
>>as PDC, right?
>
> Yep. There is a small hitch in the way the replication works, I'll have
> a patch in CVS fairly soon, so watch out for it and update before you
> deploy. The issue is about 'ldap rebind sleep' (we need to wait
Hello,
thanks, I really cant understand that I missed this - I tried to search all
over for instructions relating to /tmp and permissions on it yet failed
miserably.
Thanks for the tip. I hate myself for not mailing much earlier!!!
chmodded, restarted samba tested with simple smb.conf, ok.
chang
My smbpasswd file is empty. I am ptretty sure Samba uses LDAP for
authenticating users. Changing the password in LDAP database results in
login errors, so there is a connection. The bart account is indeed the
first, but I already noticed other accounts use the same user SID, so
there is somethi
Hi there!
Samba-2.2.8a
There is possible deadlock in smbmount (smbmount.c) when parent process forking.
Maybe this is a Linux-only bug (2.4 and 2.6 shows the same). But this is enough to
apply my patch (or make other proper thing[s]).
Explaining:
Smbmount need to be a daemon to serve the mountpo
75 matches
Mail list logo
