Curtis Vaughan wrote:
Are there any OS X users on this list, who are having real success with
Apple's implementation of Samba?
I would like to start a discussion about several problems with Samba on
OS 10.3.
Curtis Vaughan
Successfully set up OS X 10.3.2 Server as a Windows PDC, including
sev
why don't you make or use accounting software for linux.. ??
it save you the problem's..
got some examples for you, but this version uses mysql.. ?
(combined with the mysql passwd backend...)
l8r
-
Collen Blijenberg (MLHJ)
Tuesday, March 2, 2004, 4:16:
I followed the instructions at www.wlug.org.nz on Fedora Core and it worked
just fine.
- Original Message -
From: "Alberto Tablado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Help in "joining" Linux on AD domain.
Check that t
* Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> nulis:
> On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 23:36, Beast wrote:
> > When BDC will not make any changes in ldap, is it safe to not set any *script
> > paramater in smb.conf?
>
> If you can keep the scripts identical between PDC and BDC, this will
> avoid supprises.
>
> B
Dear Nick,
I had the same problem and it works for me with 'security = 770' setting in
the share (using 3.0.2a as well). So ACLs usable, as far as I can understand
'force * mode' doesn't work (w/ ACL?).
Hope it helps,
Ralf
--
Name: Ralf Tomczak
Firma:scitech it solutions
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 17:26, steve downes wrote:
> I've got a working samba setup on a debian linux server. Existing
> windows boxes are win98 with unencripted passwords. They only need to
> see the exported directories on the samba server. All the networking
> is working. (dns, dhcp, ping, interne
Hi,
The Solution on my side was to use the 'security mask' feature ('security
mask = 770')!
Hope it helps you as well.
Ralf
--
Name: Ralf Tomczak
Firma:scitech it solutions GmbH
Adresse: Neuendorfstraße 18 a
16761 Hennigsdorf
I've searched google and found several dozen links saying this isn't
possible yet. However most of these are old, so I was wondering if this
is yet possible?
If so, can someone please let me know what is required or point me in
the right direction to get my Samba client connection to MSDFS?
Je
Li um questão sua em um site perguntando sobre compatitibilidade samba +
dosemu. Conseguiu resolver, pode me ajuda ?
Grato.
Julio - Curitiba.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Are there any OS X users on this list, who are having real success with
Apple's implementation of Samba?
I would like to start a discussion about several problems with Samba on
OS 10.3.
Curtis Vaughan
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://l
After a lot of searching and some frustration, I finally got a Windows
2000 Pro. client joining my test Samba 3.0.2a domain. My only question
is with the automatic user addition. After the client joined the domain,
the machinename$ was added to /etc/passwd. Is this necessary? I am
looking into migr
"Alex Meaden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I am running Debian on an i386 machine. I recently upgraded to Debian
> Testing, which upgraded Samba from 2.2 to 3.0.2. Since then, I have been
> having several problems. The Samba server is used as a PDC for Windows
> XP
Hi guys,
I'm experiencing seemingly random problems using roaming profiles with
Samba 3.0.2 on Debian Woody and clients being Win XP Pro and Win2K (all
of them running the latest service packs and critical updates and so
forth).
Sometimes when one of the machines tires to login the server profile
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
Delivery failed for the following recipients(s):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The message you sent contained an attachment which the recipient has chosen to block.
Usually these sort of attachments are blocked to prevent malicious sof
Check that the realm is mapped correctly to the KDC machine, via
kerberos config files or _kerberos DNS entries.
El jue, 26-02-2004 a las 16:20, Boniforti Flavio escribió:
> Hello all!
>
> Is anybody there who can help me in the task of having my Linux-box
> joined our AD Windows 2000 Server?
>
I've got a working samba setup on a debian linux server. Existing
windows boxes are win98 with unencripted passwords. They only need to
see the exported directories on the samba server. All the networking
is working. (dns, dhcp, ping, internet access, etc )
Anything I do on my new XP Pro box or in
Hi,
I am attempting to use Samba 3.0.2a on RedHat 9.0 with winbindd to
authenticate accounts in an NT 4.0 domain to a samba member server with the
below configuration:
The samba configuration file is as follows:
[global]
workgroup = Domainname
netbios name = SBX-SM
# VIRUS NOTIFICATION #
A message you sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
contains a virus or a worm, and was not delivered.
--
DATE : Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:50:25 +
SUBJECT: Status
VIRUS : W32/Rox-A
--
It is possible your computer is infected without you
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
>
> | Does anyone have a suggesion on what to try next?
> | Can anyone verify that they've successfully built Samba
> | 3.0.2 on Solaris 8 or 9?
>
> Make sure that /usr/usb is not in your path.
>
Thanks for the suggestion. This was in fact my pr
Does anyone else have an idea about this? I appriciate ANY input.
Thanks!
deflin39
> hmmm then im out of options
> sry
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Patrick Lambooy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 4:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [Samba] samba tra
Hello,
I am running Debian on an i386 machine. I recently upgraded to Debian
Testing, which upgraded Samba from 2.2 to 3.0.2. Since then, I have been
having several problems. The Samba server is used as a PDC for Windows
XP Pro. clients. Sometimes (often) when users log on, they get an error
ab
List:
I am encountering a problem with files on my samba mounted directories
accessed from Windows shares. The shares are normally accessed from a
Windows 98 machine (but I've used XP, and the problem is still
present). The problem: When accessing files from a samba-mounted
directory through W
Sorry for the Nickname in my last posting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi there,
Perhaps this will help.
You are able to start different smbd with different smb.conf like
described in:
http://de.samba.org/samba/docs/man/bugreport.html#id2979912
It could work if you star two different smbd instances one loading with
a smbd.conf for bind interfaces only = eth0 and o
Hello,
Does anybody know if Winbind works on AIX 5.2, and how ?
I did not find any usable documentation to set up the config...
./configure builds winbind
Winbind seems to have specific options for AIX (cf manpage)
The source code says that enumeration of users and groups is not yet
possible (wha
> > Hi,
> > I'm on solaris 9, and using winbind to be a part of our NT domain.
> >
> > I'm trying to determine if it's possible to configure winbind/smb so
> > that when the nt login name matches the unix login name the share is
> > mounted using their unix uid. With none matching account names,
On Windows 9x/XP clients I can connect to the samba server by its name, ip
address but
when I try to browse the network using Network Neighbourhood only the samba
can be seen.
After restarting client(s) they can see each other including server too for
a while.
Clients computers using TCP/IP only c
I have removed SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 settings from socket_options.
It helped. I hope it's not having any side effect.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 8:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Sa
On Windows 9x/XP clients I can connect to the samba server by its name, ip
address but
when I try to browse the network using Network Neighbourhood only the samba
can be seen.
After restarting client(s) they can see each other including server too for
a while.
Clients computers using TCP/IP only c
I have removed SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 from socket_options.
It helped. I hope it's not having any side effect.
- Original Message -
From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] much slower bac
No reference to Unicode, I was trying to log in as root to the workstation
as I hadn't created any other users except Administrator. When I log in as
the Administrator the clients don't crash only when I log in as root. I
created other users and they work too. This isn't a problem as I was going
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 10:10:09AM +0100, TeeCee wrote:
> I may have known the security reasons, but the password is not in plain text,
The password hash is equivalent to plain text in smb.
Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://list
I've just installed the samba-2.2.7-Tru64-OSF5.1 kit on
my alpha system and cant login to swat as root.
Login as a normal user is OK, and root-login can be achieved if
I use 'swat -a' in the inetd.conf entry.
I saw others reporting this problem in the archives, but
couldnt find a solution posted
I had filed bug report #1087 two weeks ago, but no replies so far. I hope
that somebody from Samba Team will take a look soon at that problem. Until
then, I'll stick to 2.2.8a. It's not so good as 3.0.2, but at least it
works.
Also, I got this from somebody:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.asp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Day wrote:
| Does anyone have a suggesion on what to try next?
| Can anyone verify that they've successfully built Samba
| 3.0.2 on Solaris 8 or 9?
Make sure that /usr/usb is not in your path.
cheers, jerry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versi
## From my experience you need MIT Kerberos
## If you still want Sun Kerberos then the
## most you can expect is that both MIT &
## Sun Kerberos will look at the same config files
## krb5.conf etc
## hope this makes sense, Andy.
Hi,
So Does it mean that samba can be integrated
with sun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
I've a samba 2.2.8a with a ldap backend
I've win2k workstations on the domain.
Most of time there's no problem ... but sometime,
the win2k workstations are losing there domain ..
I had to re-join the domain .
In fact my problem is not to rej
We are using Samba for shares and Winbind for Active Directory authentication, and are
down
to a few problems.
If the AD goes down or reboots, Winbind loses its connection. In the winbind log, it
reports:
Could not open a connection to TEST1 for \PIPE\NETLOGON
(NT_STATUS_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_NO
I have been using Samba as a print server successfully for quite some
time. I have one issue that I can't seem to solve. We use a crappy
piece of accounting software that requires the printer be set up with
spool settings as:
Start printing after last page is spooled.
If start printing imm
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Geddes wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
>
> > Geddes wrote:
> > > Thanks for the reply. That is the impression that I was getting too.
> > >
> > > So as an alternative to no domains, I figure I will create a domain but
> > > not join any machines to t
On my clear samba server installation I found /backup shere which points
to /var/backup on my file system. It is readable to all users created on
the serwer. In smb.conf I found no refereneces to it. Is this correct?
My system is: Debian Sarge (i686-pc-linux-gnu) with Samba 3.0.2-2 package
--
T
Object: Command "configure" aborted (with samba 2.2.7a and 2.2.8a) on HP-UX 11.0
Hello,
The command ./configure has aborted:
cd /samba-2.2.7a/source
./configure
...
checking whether struct passwd has pw_age... yes
checking for poptGetContext in -lpopt... no
chec
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 23:36, Beast wrote:
> When BDC will not make any changes in ldap, is it safe to not set any *script
> paramater in smb.conf?
If you can keep the scripts identical between PDC and BDC, this will
avoid supprises.
BDCs will not normally be asked to make changes, but if asked,
Hi there,
this one starts driving me nuts:
1. Configuration:
- iPlanet LDAP Server
- Solaris 9 Server 1 - Samba 2.8.8, Domain: FRSTPRV
- Solaris 9 Server 2 - Samba 3.0.x, Domain: FRSTPRV.DE
(Problem occurs, using whatever domain name)
- x means Version 1 and Version 2a have
Hello, I have 3 devices, a RH9(with samba) a win98 and a winXP
When I try mounting a win XP directory on my linux, I have :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] travail]# smbmount //pc-dominique/travail dominique/ -o
username=dominique,password=dominique
25961: session request to PC-DOMINIQUE failed (Called name no
When BDC will not make any changes in ldap, is it safe to not set any *script
paramater in smb.conf?
--beast
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 14:23, Beast wrote:
> * Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> nulis:
>
> > > On the second try, it will works.
> > > replication sleep = 1 (10 secs).
> >
> > That means that you must make your add user script sleep. We can't
> > control that.
>
> This parameter confuse m
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 11:12, Scott Gross wrote:
> Finally figured out why I couldn't login to my samba 3.0.2a PDC, I had a
> mismatch in one of the SID's. Now that I have that figured out my
> workstations crash when logging in after applying the personal settings.
> The error is in a window title
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 19:28, Larry Ash wrote:
> > You have failed to state what your problem is!
>
> Sorry, I guess I did.
> The user logs in on the Windows machine and is prompted to change
> his/her password. The user selects a new password and everything
> seems ok except the new password is ne
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] nulis:
>
>
>
>
> The origine of my message is a problem with my local LDAP server.
>
> last thursday I upgraded my RH 8 with the glibc update from RedHAt, after
> sometimes the LDAP server is unreachable.
> In log :
> Mar 2 11:40:02 coradm01 slapd[5342]: warning: cannot o
samba 3.0.2
smbldap-tools 0.8.4
RH 9
nss_ldap configured
pam_ldap NOT configured
LDAP passwd backend
Hi,
i've instaled samba 3.0.2 with smbldap-tools 0.8.4 twice in two different RH9.
I got it runs in the first but not in the second with the same configuration
(i think) The problen is (i got th
The origine of my message is a problem with my local LDAP server.
last thursday I upgraded my RH 8 with the glibc update from RedHAt, after
sometimes the LDAP server is unreachable.
In log :
Mar 2 11:40:02 coradm01 slapd[5342]: warning: cannot open
/etc/hosts.allow: Too many open files
Mar 2
Hi,
We've recently upgraded from samba 2.2 to samba 3.0.2.a . We used to get
the session name with %U on our samba server. This name was used when
receiving a fax message for the samba fax. The name was used to send
an acknowledge message to the user. In version 2.2 this worked fine ,
also for
Interesting...
But I you didn't show me what says
#testparm -v (when U press enter to see dump of system definitions)
(because I don't understand why it looking for uniqueMember=uid=smb3)
And show please samba logs
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instru
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] nulis:
>
>
>
>
> If the first LDAP server faild, the second can be used directly.
> This server is a PDC server with more than 100 people connected and some
> application required domain authentification for running.
>
> For me is a critical server.
You can use one ldapsa
Hi,
We've recently upgraded from samba 2.2 to samba 3.0.2.a . We used to get
the session name with %U on our samba server. This name was used when
receiving a fax message for the samba fax. The name was used to send
an acknowledge message to the user. In version 2.2 this worked fine ,
also for
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] nulis:
>
>
>
>
> What's means, can I have some problem with this configuration ?
> Or it's just a speed problem ?
>
Samba will get 2 value for same id and problem will appear soon or later.
Any reason why using 2 ldapsam backend?
## Speaking for myself, It's not good
Hi,
We've recently upgraded from samba 2.2 to samba 3.0.2.a . We used to get
the session name with %U on our samba server. This name was used when
receiving a fax message for the samba fax. The name was used to send
an acknowledge message to the user. In version 2.2 this worked fine ,
also
> The domain-login ist ok in general. But when a user logs in, he
> gets
> an editor-window with a desktop.ini.
>
> content:
> [.ShellClassInfo]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ,-21787
> )
>
> i think, this ist desktop.ini in
> //%L/profiles/%u/startmenu/autostart.
>
> Do you have an idea how to ban this
Please do not reply this E-Mail message. This mailbox does not accept
incoming E-Mail.
==
Unsafe Attachment(s) Stripped
Please note: White & Case LLP., firm mail policy dictates that unsafe
attachment types are not allowed in incoming messages,
If the first LDAP server faild, the second can be used directly.
This server is a PDC server with more than 100 people connected and some
application required domain authentification for running.
For me is a critical server.
---
Stéphane PURNELLE
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] nulis:
>
>
>
>
> What's means, can I have some problem with this configuration ?
> Or it's just a speed problem ?
>
Samba will get 2 value for same id and problem will appear soon or later.
Any reason why using 2 ldapsam backend?
> Stéphane
>
--beast
--
To unsubscrib
I know an unorthodox way of solving that.
You may run msconfig and edit the Startup section. Simply uncheck the desktop entry at
the end of the list. At restart you have to confirm the change you just have made and
you will get rid of the desktop problem.
Please let me know if you find out
Hi Jeremy and thanks for the fast answer! :o)
> Samba smbd does that. This file should not be 644, as it contains
> the users hashed passwords (ie. you're giving full access to all
> users passwords to anyone on the system). Samba is trying to
> protect you from yourself here
I may have known
Hi,
i got a host with samba 3.02 (debian) wich is acting as a wins server
for 2 subnets. i got smb_panics shown below.
Can someone help me troubleshooting this ?
Thanks
[2004/02/27 10:07:38, 2]
nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_browser(537)
1850 become_local_master_browser: Starti
What's means, can I have some problem with this configuration ?
Or it's just a speed problem ?
Stéphane
John H Terpstra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dario croelectronic.com> writes:
> I have really weird problem with XP Pro and Samba 3 (I tried 3.0.1 and
> 3.0.2). Samba 2.2.8a works with no problem.
>
> I can login with no problems. But when I login and logout few times
> (sometimes one, sometimes five times) then XP can not load roaming pro
Hi list,
I too have this 'problem': this desktop.ini - typically for saving
directory/desktop settings - is visible in about every directory on the
roaming profiles: desktop, autostart, quickstart, etc.
Does anyone know why this happens?
Thx,
Stumpfl Markus
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 09:28:27AM +0100, TeeCee wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I want to list users from smbpasswd (stored in /etc/samba). I chmoded the
> file from 600 to 644, to ba able to read it with PHP. After a while somehow
> it changed back to 600, so it was fully unreadable again :(
> How can I
Hi!
I want to list users from smbpasswd (stored in /etc/samba). I chmoded the
file from 600 to 644, to ba able to read it with PHP. After a while somehow
it changed back to 600, so it was fully unreadable again :(
How can I set that the samba don't need to change it back OR change it
deafau
Hi there,
WinXP Prof-Client on a samba 3.0.2a-Domain
The domain-login ist ok in general. But when a user logs in, he gets
an editor-window with a desktop.ini.
content:
[.ShellClassInfo]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ,-21787 )
i think, this ist desktop.ini in
//%L/profiles/%u/startmenu/autostart.
Do you
> You have failed to state what your problem is!
Sorry, I guess I did.
The user logs in on the Windows machine and is prompted to change
his/her password. The user selects a new password and everything
seems ok except the new password is never stored on the
Active Directory machine. No errors, the
72 matches
Mail list logo
