We are currently running Open Enterprise Server from Novell and have been
migrating to Samba. We have ran into an issue where occasionally a user will
click on a directory and it will just sit there forever with an hour glass
or flashlight. If you go to the same directory through a command prompt a
Hi again,
I've now got this all working, and thought I'd outline what I did for
others:
On 6/1/07, Adam Tauno Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the tip - I think half my problem is I'm not exactly sure
what
> I'm looking for.
ADM files and POLEDIT.EXE
With that piece of info
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:44:29PM +0200, Matthias Merz wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Today I noticed some strange behaviour when accessing a samba server
> (samba 3.0.25a) from windows: On our Debian fileserver I prepared a
> file testfile.txt being owned by user usera and group dpt-a. Then I
> "setfacl
Hi Charles, Josh, et al,
Firstly, this is getting off topic a little, so don't read on unless you're
interested in how Samba might be used to make email usage easier in a home
environment with multiple computers.
On 6/2/07, Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josh Kelley wrote:
> On 5/31
Everyone,
I have finally resolved the new heartburn 3.0.24 on Ubuntu Feisty was
giving me and have stumbled upon some information that might help others
out there.
I was seeing problems with ACL entries getting mangled and disappearing,
Excel making files read only and extended attributes do
Hi folks,
Today I noticed some strange behaviour when accessing a samba server
(samba 3.0.25a) from windows: On our Debian fileserver I prepared a
file testfile.txt being owned by user usera and group dpt-a. Then I
"setfacl -m g:admins:rwx testfile.txt". User userb who is only in
group admins, but
Josh Kelley wrote:
On 5/31/07, Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would recommend against doing this... Microsoft itself recommends
against it, but I have also had problems with corruption in .pst files
that are stored on a network share, both on Windows shares *and* Samba
shares...
We have bumped into a most odd problem.
Server:
Debian Etch and their Samba 3.0.24-2
Client:
WinXP SP2, MSI v3, all hot fixes
The following settings are in place on the server:
#!/bin/bash
#
# initGrps.sh
# Map Windows Domain Groups to UNIX groups
net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixg
Hello,
What user flags are available to the net ads | rpc user add command.
It states in the man pages that you can add [-F user flags] but not
which flags?
Please help this is important as I now only can create disabled users
in my AD.
Regards,
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
Hello,
First time using the new ads function and have some questions.
I'm issuing the command 5 times with different parameters and only
one succeeds.
#net ads dns register
DNS update failed!
#net ads dns register -P
DNS update failed!
#net ads dns register -P -I 10.170.4.10
DNS update fail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
> Do you know if this was specific to Solaris? Or is linux also
> affected?I had configure warnings building on solaris 9
> and 10.
Generic bug to all platforms I think. Have not
confirmed it yet though.
jerry
-B
I have upgraded to SAMBA 3.0.25a and that broke my interdomain trust to Windows
2003.
I have seen a similar error before, so I don't think it is directly related to
the new version. But I still need som help...
Creating the trust (CALYPSO is the Windows 2003-server):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# ne
I filed a bug report about this exact issue yesterday. Everything you
are describing aligns 100% with what I'm experiencing too. I can use
the exact same smb.conf with 3.0.24 and it works fine. The bug report
is at https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4673 (down for
maintenance as I type t
Do you know if this was specific to Solaris? Or is linux also
affected?I had configure warnings building on solaris 9 and 10.
Thanks
On 6/1/07, Gerald (Jerry) Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
>pdc # ./wbinfo -
Good morning,
I have a working Offline Files setup w/Samba 3.0.24 (FreeBSD 6.2 host OS)
and a Win XP SP2 client. Upon updating to Samba 3.0.25, the XP client's
offline cache would show (as viewed via the Offline Files Folder) that
synced files are write-only ('User W' in the Access column). When
Can you set Excel to use the local drive for the temporary files? By
default, MS Office creates temporary files in the same directory as
the original file. In the past, troubleshooting a LAN related issue,
it seemed that when saving a file, excel would rewrite the entire file
to a new file then
This affects local logins as well as RDP.
On 6/1/07, Jean-Jacques Moulis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007 17:53:10 -0400 Gaiseric Vandal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GV> I joined 2 Windows 2003 machines to the domain. I was able to log as
GV> "administrator" and "root" but no other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Urs,
> Does someone know how to do this group mapping in samba?
Please read the documentation or at least the right
help text.
# /opt/samba/bin/net groupmap add
Usage: net groupmap add {rid=|sid=} unixgroup=
[type=] [ntgroup=] [comment=]
No offens
Usage:
net time to view or set time information
net lookupto lookup host name or ip address
net user to manage users
net group to manage groups
net sam to edit the local user database directly
net lookupto look up va
On Friday 01 June 2007, Urs Golla wrote:
> Does someone know how to do this group mapping in samba? why does "net
> groupmap x y" has no effect? If I map a domain group to a local group,
> then the members of the domain group should be treated as members of
> the local group, or not?
Maybe spendin
> > You can mount Linux file systems on Windows you just have to have the right
> > utilities to do so. Linux supports NTFS (NTVFS is another matter) with
> > ntfs-3g now.
> So for instance, I could take a partition on a Windows server (NTFS) and
> share it using Samba instead of the Windows sha
Does someone know how to do this group mapping in samba? why does "net
groupmap x y" has no effect? If I map a domain group to a local group,
then the members of the domain group should be treated as members of
the local group, or not?
On 6/1/07, Urs Golla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Usage:
ne
You can mount Linux file systems on Windows you just have to have the right
utilities to do so. Linux supports NTFS (NTVFS is another matter) with
ntfs-3g now.
So for instance, I could take a partition on a Windows server (NTFS) and
share it using Samba instead of the Windows share service
On 5/31/07, Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would recommend against doing this... Microsoft itself recommends
against it, but I have also had problems with corruption in .pst files
that are stored on a network share, both on Windows shares *and* Samba
shares...
Just to share my own
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Urs Golla wrote:
> Hi
>
> I mean, if i do a "net groupmap add mydomaingroup mylocalgroup". what
> is exactly the result of this?
That's not valid syntax. run "net group" for the syntax help text.
cheers, jerry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Vers
Hi
I mean, if i do a "net groupmap add mydomaingroup mylocalgroup". what
is exactly the result of this?
cheers
On 6/1/07, Gerald (Jerry) Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Urs Golla wrote:
> Hello
>
> I still have a problem with the "net groupmap a
Hi again,
On 6/1/07, Adam Tauno Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You are seeing documentation on GPOs / Group Policies. You want NT4
Domain Policies. You need to look at *OLD* Windows documentation. If
it doesn't mention NT4, or it mentions AD, ignore it.
A... now that, makes sense
> All the information I've been able to find references windows tools
Of course.
> - the
> part I'm missing is where the windows tools stop and Samba takes over
It doesn't, at all. NT4 domain policies require no action from the PDC
at all. It is just a file loaded by the client from a specif
I recently started playing with pdbedit to set the maximum password age policy
on v3.0.25a. After setting
this policy, I see that running pdbedit -Lv shows the machine accounts expiring
in the same time frame as
the user accounts. So my question is do the machine accounts actually expire
jus
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 03:54:05PM +0800, liujack wrote:
> Dear Jeremy:We use samba 2.2.12 as our samba
> server, and it worked perfectly before, but now there
> is one security problem found in samba 3.0 now, so we
> worry about our samba server, but for some reason we can't
> upda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Urs Golla wrote:
> Hello
>
> I still have a problem with the "net groupmap add" command. If I add a
> domain group to a lcoal group, the memebers of the domain group should
> show up as members of the local group. Or am I totaly wrong?
Yes. But that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dos filemode works for the main unixgroup, but not for ACL-Users/Groups
> (with full access).
> Is there an opportunity also for ACL-Users/Groups
It does apply to acls in current releases. Easlier release use the
"acl g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
liujack,
> Dear Jeremy:We use samba 2.2.12 as our
> samba server, and it worked perfectly before,
> but now there is one security problem found in
> samba 3.0 now, so we worry about our samba server,
> but for some reason we can't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
>pdc # ./wbinfo -t
>checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed
>error code was NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE (0xc008)
>Could not check secret
Known issue. I'll fix this for 3.0.25b. In the
Hi Dimitri,
> I think I have two questions - one which is samba and one which is windows
> policy files. I'll try to limit this question to the samba side but will
> give the full picture for completeness.
>
> I'm trying to implement a simple policy to redirect a few simple folders
> (for starte
Hello
I still have a problem with the "net groupmap add" command. If I add a
domain group to a lcoal group, the memebers of the domain group should
show up as members of the local group. Or am I totaly wrong?
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructio
Hi Adam,
Thanks for your reply. A couple a questions inline:
On 5/31/07, Adam Tauno Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a Windows issue, not a Samba issue.
All the information I've been able to find references windows tools - the
part I'm missing is where the windows tools stop and
Sven Geggus schrieb:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> > But I'll can change ACLs, if i'm the owner of this file/folder. If
> > I'm member of an ownerproup or I have full access via ACLs (as user or
> > as a member of a group) I always get an error message:
> > setfacl: test_unixgrpvoll: Op
I have a gut feeling that this is to do with encrypted passwords.
I have "encrypt passwords = no" set and pc's have the clear text password hack -
could this be causing it?
I really don't want to go t encrypted passwords if I can help it as it will mean
another password file to keep in sync.
R
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But I'll can change ACLs, if i'm the owner of this file/folder. If I'm
> member of an ownerproup or I have full access via ACLs (as user or as a
> member of a group) I always get an error message:
>
> setfacl: test_unixgrpvoll: Operation not permitted
RTFL hels in
Hi,
I am using 3.0.22 on Ubuntu 6.06. I'm trying to setup a DFS root. Here
is the smb.conf share section:
My smb.conf file is:
[global]
# use default
; security = user
host msdfs = yes
[Share]
path=/var/Share
writable=yes
msdfs root=yes
The dfs link is:
# ls -l /var/Share/Data/2007/OfficeAdmi
Dear Jeremy:We use samba 2.2.12 as our samba server, and it worked
perfectly before, but now there is one security problem found in samba 3.0
now, so we worry about our samba server, but for some reason we can't update
to samba 3.0.25, so can you tell us whether the problem be
Hi,
I have just upgraded a server from Samba 2 to Samba 3 and some of the
Windows clients are taking a long time to authenticate shares (1 or 2
minutes). Eventually the username/password box appears and then when you
enter a correct password, all is fine - it is just the initial
authentication.
T
On Thu, 31 May 2007 17:53:10 -0400 Gaiseric Vandal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GV> I joined 2 Windows 2003 machines to the domain. I was able to log as
GV> "administrator" and "root" but no other accounts, whether local or
GV> not. The user accounts them self seem OK- it just seems to be a
GV> winb
44 matches
Mail list logo
