This may sound stupid, but I'm honestly missing it - I was running
Fedora 5, samba version 3.0.24. I just switch to Centos 5, samba
version 3.0.23c. I made no changes to my smb.conf. I used to have
the / filesystem shared as sys. that no longer works - the 'lowest'
on the tree I can share now i
Hi there,I run samba as a PDC and tried to make this PDC high available with
redhat cluster suite and gfs. I experienced the following problem while
doing this:
If I set the option locking = no in smb.conf it takes about 4 minutes to
copy a file of 1GB size. If I set locking = yes it takes about 1
Hi there,
I run samba as a PDC and tried to make this PDC high available with redhat
cluster suite and gfs. I experienced the following problem while doing this:
If I set the option locking = no in smb.conf it takes about 4 minutes to copy a
file of 1GB size. If I set locking = yes it takes about
On 2/6/2008, Michael Heydon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
We have something setup here (on a smaller scale) that might be
useful. Our main file server rsync's with our backup server every
hour (using hardlinks to keep snapshots). Since relatively little
data changes between each sync, it is fairly
Adam Williams, on 2/7/2008 2:01 PM, said the following:
thats right, everything in c:\documents and settings\username will be
put into \\server\profiles\username
No, it WILL NOT.
The Local Settings folder is NOT included BY DEFAULT with roaming
profiles.
> no need to shout. i learn someth
I have a Win2K Small Business Server which is also a PDC (sbsserver).
I have added a FreeBSD box running Samba 3.0.28 as a member server
(samba_server).
I can mount shares offered by both the sbsserver and samba_server fine when I
do it on the local network.
However, when I connect through a V
On Feb 9, 2008 8:49 AM, markus neis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,I run samba as a PDC and tried to make this PDC high available
> with
> redhat cluster suite and gfs. I experienced the following problem while
> doing this:
> If I set the option locking = no in smb.conf it takes about 4 mi
On a CentOS 5.1 server samba works perfectly as long as connections exist. If
no connections exist nmbd shuts down:
service smb status
smbd (pid 2970 2934) is running...
nmbd dead but pid file exists
On this last occasion it had been less than 5 minutes between connections.
What could be causi
On Feb 9, 2008 3:01 PM, markus neis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i set oplocks = yes , kernel oplocks = yes and as I said locking = yes,
> but this slows down everything
>
>
OK, from what I gather (which very well could be inaccurate), it looks like
you might be stuck on a spinlock timeout on a b
i set oplocks = yes , kernel oplocks = yes and as I said locking = yes, but
this slows down everything
_
Der WEB.DE SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
http://smartsurfer.web.de/?mc=100071&distributionid=0
Damn! this doesn't sound good. I hope somebody else can refute what you say ;-)
gfs shouldn't be that slow. I'm really confused.
___
GRATIS: Movie-FLAT. Jetzt freischalten!
http://freemail.web.de/club/maxdome.htm
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the foll
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 11:31:59PM +0100, Markus Neis wrote:
> Damn! this doesn't sound good. I hope somebody else can
> refute what you say ;-)
> gfs shouldn't be that slow. I'm really confused.
No offense intended, but Scott's description is not really
correct. The only parameter that should r
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 11:31:59PM +0100, Markus Neis wrote:
Damn! this doesn't sound good. I hope somebody else can
refute what you say ;-)
gfs shouldn't be that slow. I'm really confused.
No offense intended, but Scott's description is not really
correct. The
ok, but i heard people say that ctdb isn't for productional use. can you
confirm that volker?
Is it also a good idea to save the locking information on the gfs filesystem?
Bis 50 MB Dateianhänge? Kein Problem!
http://www.digitaledienste.web.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:17:02AM +0100, Markus Neis wrote:
> ok, but i heard people say that ctdb isn't for
> productional use. can you confirm that volker?
Well, it *is* used in production. It's not trivial to set
up, but it works.
> Is it also a good idea to save the locking information on
>
Ok I understand. People that earn more money than me made this decision ;-) But
I wonder why Redhat offers the possibility in their cluster suite to setup
samba services on top of gfs. This should be a known problem then. However, as
I understand you its not a good idea to use samba with gfs unl
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 06:07:36PM -0500, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
> Just to clarify, the locking semantics (regardless of type) do not
> propagate down to the kernel smb module, but rather pass to the
> underlying file system (which in turn propagates to its own kernel
> module)? Thanks, Volker
here's my smb.conf if you would be so nice ... ;-)
[global]
dos charset = 850
unix charset = CP850
display charset = LOCALE
workgroup = FILESRV
realm =
netbios name = FILESRV
netbios aliases = austauschsrv, fachaustsrv, grplwsrv
netb
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 01:00:07AM +0100, Markus Neis wrote:
> I put the tdb files out of gfs only some data files are
> now on gfs, but it's the same behavior. ;-(
If it's still slow with "posix locking = no", and tdb files
out of GFS, then more detailed analysis is necessary. This
will be tough
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:51:24AM +0100, Markus Neis wrote:
> Ok I understand. People that earn more money than me made
> this decision ;-) But I wonder why Redhat offers the
> possibility in their cluster suite to setup samba services
> on top of gfs. This should be a known problem then.
> Howeve
I put the tdb files out of gfs only some data files are now on gfs, but it's
the same behavior. ;-(
Bis 50 MB Dateianhänge? Kein Problem!
http://www.digitaledienste.web.de/freemail/club/lp/?lp=7
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the fo
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 01:08:04AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
>
> You can perfectly fine use samba on top of gfs, as long as
> you only share your data from a single node or (more
> precisely) make sure that every directory is only shared via
> a single node. Different directories can be shared
22 matches
Mail list logo
