Hi
I am new today here and have a couple of confusing items I hope someone
here o the list can straighten out for me.
1. The definitions of the served usershares apprears in more than one
location; in ubutu 12.04 LTS there appears to be a set of defined shares
in the /etc/samba/smb.conf file
Carlos R. Pena wrote on Sat 04 Aug at 16:28 UK time
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> I am using Ubuntu 12.04LTS server running samba server on it. I have
> problem accessing the shares from Windows XP with \\servername\share,
> but no problem accessing \\ip\share. How can i correct this problem?. I
>
log.client_ip" files.
Connections via the DNS name (\\server.domain.tld) connect correctly and
do not generate any errors.
Why would authentication be failing via the NetBIOS name?
Thanks in advance,
-Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https:
nto
production, so there shouldn't be any concerns on that score.
-Andy Shaw
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
to be for connecting Windows to a Samba DC, or Linux to a Windows DC.
Many thanks.
-Andy Shaw
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> What does the debug level 10 say ? There's something in there
> that Samba is detecting as an invalid name I think.
>From smbd.log, level 10. I don't see anything wrong with the filename
being mangled in the name_map line
[2011/05/31 09:02:34, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(932)
switch mess
> Oh how soon we forget :-). Google for DOS 8.3 filename limitation :-).
>
> Remember there are some filenames (containing a : character etc.) that
> Windows can't use.
>
> Jeremy.
>
If it's 8.3, I don't get what's triggering it. It's not illegal
characters or name length.
To give a specific exam
I'm seeing something fairly odd where XP clients show some - but not
nearly all -filenames as a random jumble of characters. The files are
still perfectly accessible; if I tell windows manually what the file
type is, they'll open.
I don't think it's a character set issue. Affected filenames contai
Hi,
Freezing up means a kernel bug not a Samba problem. Can you ping the
servers when they have frozen up ?
Yes, but no ssh or KVM.
Something is going on here. What more can we do to investigate it?
You need to get real data. Get servers that experience
the problem regularly to send log data
On 11/24/2010 03:47 PM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 03:03:33PM -0500, Andy Liebman wrote:
You suggested previously this might be a kernel bug, or that the
failed attempts might be using up some scarce resource (memory? open
files? what did you have in mind?) Assuming we can
instead of GPO.
>>
>> ---
>> TAKAHASHI Motonobu
>>
>
>
>
> --
> KEEP SMILING
> KEEP MAILING
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
--
REGARDS,
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Yes, that is it exactly.
On 12/8/2010 5:14 PM, Chris Smith wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Andy wrote:
How do you remove the per-user value with pdbedit and have the value read
from smb.conf? I have tried setting the per-user value both to "" and NULL.
I reported a similar
;
parameter works only to set the default value for 'profile path'.
I had problems with roaming profiles- I didn't want to use them but
sometimes on client logins/logouts the XP client would try to load
Set the below line:
logon path =
2010/12/6 Andy:
How do you force the
Who wins the fight for the roaming profile path, "logon path" in smb.conf or
"profile path" set by pdbedit?
How do you force the "profile path" in pdbedit to get its value from "logon
path" in smb.conf?
Is it possible to disable roaming profiles by user with pdbedit and leave "logon
path" set
On 11/09/2010 04:43 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:23:06AM -0500, Andy Liebman wrote:
And now I have this case.
I would appreciate the opinion of the Samba.org folks. Does it make
sense that constant bombardment of a Samba server with failed
connection attempts could
On 11/09/2010 04:43 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:23:06AM -0500, Andy Liebman wrote:
And now I have this case.
I would appreciate the opinion of the Samba.org folks. Does it make
sense that constant bombardment of a Samba server with failed
connection attempts could
f the Samba.org folks. Does it make
sense that constant bombardment of a Samba server with failed connection
attempts could cause the whole server to crash?
Regards,
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
the trick!
Sorry, my bad. Yes you are correct. It's [global] NOT [general].
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Is there documented way to traverse symlinks on share?
I sounds like maybe you need to your [General] section the following line:
unix extensions = no
That will make Samba resolve the symlinks on the server side.
Andy Liebman
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and r
values
from the "include" file be the ones that get applied?
When I run "testparm", indeed I see the values from the include file and
NOT from smb.conf. I just want to make sure there isn't some hidden
trap in what I am doing. Good advice welcome.
Andy Liebman
--
To
e any problem to get you level
10 logs (if the problem still persists). Fortunately, it's just 1 frame
of video, so the logs won't be THAT unmanageable.
Thanks!
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
a 3.5.3. We also noticed that "write cache
size" was listed as "deprecated" in 3.4.2 and that in 3.5.3 it is no
longer listed as "deprecated". Somebody besides us must have thought
keeping "write cache size" was still a good idea??
Andy Liebman
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
/Utilities)
* run the following command, all on one line:
$ defaults write com.apple.desktopservices DSDontWriteNetworkStores
true
You may have to run it as sudo, i.e.,
$ sudo defaults write com.apple.desktopservices
DSDontWriteNetworkStores true
-- Andy Liebman
--
To unsubs
According to Jeremy, using "write cache size = 262144", you end up with a 256
_megabyte_ cache for _each_ smbd process. Apparently the setting value is in
kilobytes, not bytes. With 10 active users that equals ~2.5GB of system
(virtual) memory allocated to smbd read/write cache. This would de
Since sending my first email, I have another 2 hours of flawless
performance. This contrasts with days on end of these "periodic
dropouts" before we set the "write cache" line.
It's a kernel issue - by setting write cache you are changing the
smbd read/write patterns to the disk. How muc
stand why
setting "write cache" might mitigate it, and where there is any serious
downside to specifying a write cache?
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
gabit Ports and 24 x 1 Gigabit Ports
Linux with 2.6.32.11 kernel
Samba 3.5.3
The RAID system itself can sustain writes of > 650 MB/sec and reads >
700 MB/sec. When accessing the storage from Windows workstations via 10
Gigabit, there is no problem whatsoever in reading/writing > 300 MB/
Thanks, Jeremy!
Andy
Currently aio on Linux is horribly broken due to a conservative
glibc, which limits asynchronous requests to one outstanding one
per file descriptor (which pretty much makes all io synchronous
on Linux, whether you set aio sizes or not :-( ). I think this
is a bug which
Linux or in some samba logs that you can see incrementing over time?
Thanks in advance.
-- Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
or
> pastebin.
>
> Regards
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
--
REGARDS,
Andy Z
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
t: it seems this is
not mirrored on news.gmane.org. But I will try that one first next time.
Cheers,
Andy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
s/SecurityFlags') returns the error:
"CIFS VFS: attempt to set unsupported security flags 0x8"
I have also tried using the "-o noperm" and "-S" options in mount.cifs, with
little difference.
I'm afraid I am not much closer to success, but I have learnt a l
Hi again,
Sorry to bump this, but I would be grateful for any insight anyone might
have on my problem. I don't know whether this is a error on my system(s),
or an intentional feature! Is there a better newsgroup I should approach
about this?
Thanks
Andy
"Andy Gibbs" w
he correct information: I will happily do
so if told what to provide! I have tried the Samba website and Google for
answers, but haven't found the right search phrase. If I've missed
something, I'll happily just receive a link to the right page.
Thanks for any help!
Andy
>
> Cowen and Company, LLC
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
--
REGARDS,
Andy Z
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
les, for example:
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20051130083652119
Regards,
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
e, or there was a problem with the server
> name, but when I do "ping LGD-SERVER" from the client, I receive answer.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Andy wrote:
>>
>> What message do you get when attempting to connect to the domain?
>>
>>
&g
What message do you get when attempting to connect to the domain?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Claudia Rodriguez Brasicott
wrote:
> Hello, I just configured a computer on my local network to work as a PDC
> with Samba, although I'm not able to join the Domain from the windows
> computer I w
"Server" but when I check netstat -a the system is still
listening on port 139. Can anyone confirm that this will conflict with
Samba and if so give any suggestions as how to stop the vista box
listening on this port?
thanks in advance, Andy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
e permissions on the directories that the symlinks point to?
If a user could directly see one of those directories, would he/she be
able to delete it?
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
2009/11/29 Volker Lendecke :
> Upgrade to 3.4.3, this has been fixed.
Thanks for the advice, Volker. I can confirm that upgrading to 3.4.3
(using the packages from ubuntu lucid) works for me.
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: ht
lines such as:
[2009/11/28 12:54:39, 1] smbd/service.c:1110(make_connection)
make_connection: refusing to connect with no session setup
I can't quite follow what's going on and why it's failing.
Any ideas?
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and re
some other user had open, when both users finally closed the
file the FILE would get deleted rather than the SYMLINK.
Could it be related?
Andy Liebman
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
minutes) before I
got bored and stopped my test.
In addition, I'm now capturing HD-444 DPX files which run at about 260
MB/sec and that's doing fine as well -- running at 37 percent total CPU
(out of 400 percent).
Cheers,
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following UR
ewl733info/files/sambalogpart_aa?attredirects=0&d=1
http://sites.google.com/site/andrewl733info/files/sambalogpart_ab?attredirects=0&d=1
http://sites.google.com/site/andrewl733info/files/sambalogpart_ac?attredirects=0&d=1
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
2009/2/7 Clinton Mills :
> When I rename skel_transparent.c to mytest.c and add
>
> vfs objects = mytest
>
Make sure that, in your init_samba_module function, you are setting
the right vfs name in your call to smb_register_vfs. (i.e., make sure
it's not still registering itself as skel_transparent
Please find attached a patch to add the dirsort vfs to the samba source tree.
Andy
From 41ef00bc4a8f1d3c80f0043307109ace8bbb2b49 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Kelk
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 10:08:07 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] Add new vfs (dirsort) which allows a directory list to be sorted
module.
http://code.google.com/p/samba-dirsort-vfs/downloads/list
> It would be good if we got this in git format-patch format
> :-)
I've cloned the samba repo and am in the process of massaging my vfs
changes into it. Will send a patch to this list once I have completed
that.
On Monday 29 December 2008 08:52:25 Andy Kelk wrote:
> I guess another alternative would be to have a Samba VFS that sorts
> the readdir output before passing it on. Can anyone comment on this as
> a possible solution and whether it has been accomplished before?
I have now implement
2008/12/30 Andy Kelk :
> Anyone able to shed some light on what I might be doing wrong?
I hate it when this happens. I figured out my stupid mistake (sending
the wrong name in smb_register_vfs.
Apologies for time-wasting.
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and r
2008/12/29 Andy Kelk :
> I guess another alternative would be to have a Samba VFS that sorts
> the readdir output before passing it on. Can anyone comment on this as
> a possible solution and whether it has been accomplished before?
I've implemented something which (I think
s would be much appreciated.
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
o say.
I think it would be an interesting discussion. NFS seems to make use of
multicores in a more even way. That doesn't mean the NFS behavior is
better.
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
ver. Is it possible? What if I give
more than one IP Address to the SAMBA Server? Can I connect some shares
to one IP address and other shares to the other IP Address? Will that
result in more than one cifsd?
Andy Liebman
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
ers under /Dept will
inherit the permissions. Please advise. Thank you very much.
Best Regards
Andy Zhou/ICILSZX
_
From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andy Zhou/ICILSZX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Sent: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 09:43:16 +0800
Subject: Re
e
with Samba domain, user cannot change the permissin setting in folder's
security button, even though we set "nt acl support = Yes" in Global setting in
smb.conf. Does samba 3.0.25 support "nt acl support"?
Any pointers will be very appreciated. Thank you.
Best R
stall.
Thanks!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Andy Diaz
Network Admin
Unger fabrik, llc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(213) 743-6132
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I make all steps in the guide:
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/install.html#id2546028
but command (exetuded in the same computer where is samba):
smbclient //fc9/tester -Utester%test
gives error:
Domain=[DZTI] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.2.0-17.fc9]
tree connect failed:
eric wrote:
Hi,
Do you use acl FS ?
Derrick.
Yes. ext3 mounted with acl support.
Andy Liebman a écrit :
Can anyone recommend a good "how to" for mapping Windows ACLs onto a
Samba Share? I have a very specific Windows permission setting that
I'm trying to create and I can
ow the application deals with Read
Only files on a local NTFS filesystem. My assumption is that I must
recreate the exact same permission on files stored on the Samba share.
Ideally, somebody has a chart that displays in one column "desired
Windows ACLS" and in a second column what you h
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:47:08AM -0400, Andy Liebman wrote:
Does this problem sound familiar to anybody. On a busy Linux server
that exports lots of Samba Shares for video editing, upgrading from
Samba 3.0.23d to Samba 3.0.28a has caused a huge problem.
After
eems to be running fine.
Restarting Samba, and reconnecting to the shares brings the files back.
The problem I am describing has been very reproducible. It's just a
matter of waiting a few hours and occurs. Reverting back to Samba
3.0.23d makes the problem go away.
Any ideas?
Andy Liebman
--
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if there is any support for samba and terminal services? I
currently have two windows boxes, one with terminal services installed and
the other with active directory. From what I have seen terminal services
relies heavily upon AD and DNS. Could anyone point me in
Andy wrote:
Hay together,
is the following entry in nsswitch.conf possible ?
passwd: compat
passwd_compat: winbind
I want to use the compat mode, so i can use the +/- semantic.
But in this case i cant login with username/password.
If i configure the nsswitch.conf like:
passwd: files winbind
works, but so i cant use the +/- semantic.
Andy ideas ?
Thanks,
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi all,
I'm trying to find a way to make the C# FilesystemWatcher class distinguish
between Linux mixed lower and upper case files on a Samba share. E.g., file A
is called abc.JPG and file B is abc.jpg, and Linux knows that's two files -
now, when I delete such a file via a Samba share, both f
config files. Why can't I
browse to it?
--
REGARDS,
Andy Z
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hello
Is it possible to create a samba logoff script. I currently use netlogon for
a logonscript. I also want a logoff scipt to allow me to back certain files
up once a user logs off.
Is this possible? If so how?
--
REGARDS,
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
he storage of usernames and passwords.
--
REGARDS,
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Thanks guys I fixed the problem, it was not actually a software problem. The
switch the server was on was stuffed, It kept dropping out.
Thanks for all your help
On Jan 3, 2008 3:01 PM, Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I have set up a Debian etch server with a
text for message number 0x%1
in the message file for %2"
Does anyone know the cause for this, or does anyone know how to fix it?
--
REGARDS,
Andy Z
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
error message pops up saying "the
following error occurred attempting to join the domain "test": The specific
network name is no longer available"
Would some know the cause of this?
--
REGARDS,
Andy Z
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 December 2007 22:07
To: Andy Partington
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] ntlm_auth issue
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 16:40 +, Andy Partington wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I have be
ECTED] ~]# /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --username=andy
--domain=WILTS.LOCAL
password:
could not obtain winbind separator!
Reading winbind reply failed! (0x01)
: (0x0)
I've tried changing winbind separator with a / and * and also left it
out as it defaults to / ? but still receive this error, I e
service.c:make_connection_snum(782)
As I said, most users have no problem connecting to this share.
Hope this rings a bell for somebody out there...
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
th options "optimized for Core 2/Dual Core
Xeons" and with SMP support for Dual Core (versus HT).
Good insights would be appreciated.
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Finally tracked this down... The profile path for each user, configured in
my LDAP directory, used %L instead of the server's netbios name hard-coded.
E.g., \\%L\profiles\andy instead of \\alpha\profiles\andy. Whilst the %L
seems to be subsituted correctly for 2k/xp logons, it was not f
h
vista. So, instead of reading the profile from \\alpha\profiles\andy, vista
will use \\alpha\profiles\andy.v2. So, I created a folder 'andy.v2' in my
profiles folder, set the correct permissions and tried again. Same error.
I'm now stumped and cannot find any other resources about
ent exit after about 10 seconds with no nss winbind result.
See the nsswitch/winbind message above !
winbind enumerating is activated.
I couldnt find something similar on www.
Any ideas ? Thank you very much !
Andy
___
SMS s
I get a different error if I add "unix password sync = yes" This time it
gives me the error "you do not have permission to change your password"
Everything that I've seen related to this error says to upgrade to 3.0.4,
but I'm running 3.0.24.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
2007 11:55:06 -0600 (CST)
Von: "Andy Colvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: samba@lists.samba.org
CC:
Betreff: [Samba] Changing LDAP password from Windows XP
I've got a very simple setup with Samba 3.0.24 running on Fedora Core 6,
talking to Fedora Directory Server 1.0.4. I
nt = Home Directories
browseable = no
read only = no
guest ok = no
create mode = 0664
directory mode = 0775
Thanks,
Andy Colvin
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
.txt looks like:
public = *
god = bob, andy, tim
thanx in advance
Andy
_
Share your latest news with your friends with the Windows Live Spaces
friends module.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp007001msn/direct/01/?href=http://
then keep the "public" folder accessible to all without the need for a
username and password..
this made me think that SHARE-level security would be best.. but i'm still a
N00b
..heres my conf!
-andy
#=== Global Settings ===
ked xbox) can't
deal with the authentication of "security = user" though "share level" could
hit the public directory nicely..
Is there any way to do this?
-ANdy
_
Talk now to your Hotmail contacts wi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Andy,
I noticed your post on the samba list.
Did you ever resolve it ?
I have the same issue with 3.0.22 and XFS group quotas not working, did you
ever find a resolution ?
-Michael Carmody
I did not resolve it. I am still using 3.0.13 precisely because of
solves this problem). That is not an option at the
moment.
Thanks in advance for the help.
Andy Liebman
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
as on the shares so that OS
X sees the shares as under 2 TB. Pre-Tiger OS X versions can't deal with
shares seen as being over 2 TB -- they simply can't write to them. Say
"no space available".
Andy Liebman
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
is going on,
I would be happy to collect the information.
But, it has to be in the next couple of hours. It is 8:30 am Friday in
Boston, MA USA. I have to reboot the machine to use it in about 3 hours.
Note that rpc.statd also seems to be out of control. Don't know if it is
related.
gotten a reply
from anybody.
Andy Liebman
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
.13 to be the most stable and trouble-free
of all of the Samba versions I have used with OS X.
Hope that helps.
Andy Liebman
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
al to the size of the PHYSICAL
VOLUME (in this case, 4.4 TB).
What can I do to help you track down the source of this problem? Is
there a workaround? It doesn't seem as though this is the same problem
that was reported earlier about LVM and XFS and Quotas.
Regards,
Andy Liebman
--
To u
on is a member of the group, by the
way.
Andy
Hi,
We use XFS, Samba and Quotas. Until now, we haven't had any issues
with
Samba versions up to 3.0.13. But we are testing Samba 3.0.22 and
noticing that when we set group quotas on XFS volumes, the quotas are
NOT gett
Properties" of a Samba share. With 3.0.13 and below, the group quotas
come through fine. In both cases, we are using 2.6.14 kernels. Any
ideas? Any tests we can run to help sort this out?
Regards,
Andy Liebman
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I'm using Samba 3.0.21 on a FC4 box.
When copying files using smbclient I get huge speed differences between
put and get commands.
smb: \> put backup.tar
putting file backup.tar as \backup.tar (543.0 kb/s) (average 543.0 kb/s)
smb: \> get backup.tar
getting
the directory containing the file should determine if the file can be
moved or deleted or overwritten.
Any comments or insights into where you are heading with this?
Andy Liebman
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
in Users"
preferred master = yes
domain logons = yes
logon script = STARTUP.BAT
logon path = \\%N\Profiles\%U
password server = *HOSTNAME*
#Added Feb 06 - Andy Kesterson
#These probably arn't needed but I wanted to make sure they were
#properly declared.
g so with the Fedora core 4 release, that would definitely point
to something strange here.
Smitty
Hibbard T. Smith, JR
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samba works fine with xfs. I have xfs volumes up to 12 TB on a Mandriva
system and export Samba shares on that volume without issue.
Andy
--
To unsubs
d can change). Once we setup the users with with the full Samba
SID we were able to execute every Samba command without a problem.
Thanks for the help
On 1/23/06, Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andy Kesterson wrote:
> >
> >The problem that we are having is w
Hi folks,
We are using Samba 3.0.10 and are using OpenLdap to manage users. We
are also usign PAM to track the users on the computer.
The problem that we are having is when Samba has the "encrypt
passwords" option is enabled, we recieve an "session setup failed:
NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE" messa
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo