Can anyone with knowledge about this issue offer any comment? Somebody
has to have an idea about it, good or bad.
Thanks,
Brian
On 9/11/2013 2:20 PM, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
I'm trying to solve this issue I'm having where using 'valid users =
+unixgroup' just plain doesn't work. I can't find
share definition...
--
Brian H. Nelson
Data Security Analyst I
IT Infrastructure Engineering
Youngstown State University
bhnelson[at]ysu[dot]edu
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
=135879161014066w=2
http://marc.info/?l=sambam=120886782118153w=2
Thanks,
Brian
--
Brian H. Nelson
Data Security Analyst I
IT Infrastructure Engineering
Youngstown State University
bhnelson[at]ysu[dot]edu
--
To unsubscribe
I hate to bump, but surely someone can offer some input on this. At
least question 1?
Thanks,
Brian
On 7/3/2013 2:56 PM, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
I noticed that the fix for bug 9190 (inc in samba 4.0) resulted in the
removal of the following config parameters:
security mask
force security
On 7/3/2013 4:54 PM, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
My guess is this is related to the Unix extensions. Basically certain
versions of OS X; I can't remember which ones but 10.5 sticks in my
mind but that might be related to symbolic links and it was 10.6 that
was the problem, notice the file server
Hello list,
I noticed that the fix for bug 9190 (inc in samba 4.0) resulted in the
removal of the following config parameters:
security mask
force security mode
directory mask
force directory security mode
I have a couple questions regarding this, and haven't really seen any
good info on
It might be a problem with nscd *negative* result caching as described
in this post:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2008-March/139102.html
which also links this post:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2006-May/120798.html
Maybe those will provide some helpful information for you.
Bino Oetomo wrote:
And ... voila ... the user can access (read-write) into the shares ...
But it'll means that the user can also execute somethings inside
directory ... right ?
Why we need the execute bit in directory permission just to let the
user to read and write only ?
That is how
the domain, do you just rejoin it
again with net rpc join ...
Thanks for any help,
Brian H
binaryno...@gmail.com
http://www.binarynomad.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
it grabbed the SID. Do I need to rejoin the BDC to the
domain?
Thanks for any help,
Brian H
binaryno...@gmail.com
http://www.binarynomad.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
We are replacing a failing PDC. When promoting a BDC to replace an
existing PDC, can you change the NETBIOS name field to match that of
the original PDC without causing problems?
Brian H
binaryno...@gmail.com
http://www.binarynomad.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
asset02 PDC LDAP
NETBIOS: PDC
IP: 172.16.1.2 172.16.1.1
Services: SAMBA, LDAP
Brian H
binaryno...@gmail.com
http://www.binarynomad.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
'
[2009/05/11 20:13:21, 2] utils/net.c:(1036)
return code = 0
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System Administrator Media and Academic Computing
bnelson[at]cis.ysu.edu
? It's not there by default and might need to be
created first.
-Brian
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System Administrator Media and Academic Computing
bnelson[at]cis.ysu.edu
with /usr/sfw/bin/gcc which uses Sun's ld. Of
course that's assuming you have the relevant packages installed.
-Brian
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System Administrator Media and Academic Computing
it was configured for, but
perhaps thats not true.
-Brian
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System Administrator Media and Academic Computing
bnelson[at]cis.ysu.edu
myron wrote:
I tried all the combinations. The furthest I get is
Linking bin/smbd
...
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [bin/smbd] Error 1
Well that's definitely a linking error. If you got the same error with
both sun ld and gnu ld then my best guess is that you have a broken
Not even a comment on this?
-Brian
Brian H. Nelson wrote:
Hi all,
I have a Windows 2003sp2 domain with a few Samba 3.0 member servers.
This domain services about 700 XP PCs distributed across 15 or so
subnets.
On one particular subnet there are about 300 PCs, 2 or 3 2003 member
servers
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System Administrator Media and Academic Computing
bnelson[at]cis.ysu.edu
---
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
issues related to this? I have a network trace and a
level 10 nmbd log of the problem. Should I open a bug?
Thanks much,
-Brian
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System Administrator Media and Academic Computing
is available on Solaris.
-Brian
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System Administrator Media and Academic Computing
bnelson[at]cis.ysu.edu
---
--
To unsubscribe from
everything with Sun's compiler. :-)
-Brian
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System Administrator Media and Academic Computing
bnelson[at]cis.ysu.edu
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System Administrator Media and Academic Computing
bnelson[at]cis.ysu.edu
---
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System Administrator Media and Academic Computing
bnelson[at]cis.ysu.edu
---
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions
updating libraries, e.g.), so it should not be set unconditionally.
Could you elaborate on why/when setting rpath would cause problems? I'm
having trouble coming up with an example.
Thanks,
-Brian
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State
' samba built on solaris. You might try
comparing the outputs of 'testparm -sv' from the two different sambas.
Perhaps some rogue default setting is affecting your performance.
-Brian
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System
are installed in a non-system location (perhaps
/usr/local/samba/lib), messing with the runtime linker config to make
samba work should NOT be required.
-Brian
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System Administrator
.
-Brian
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System Administrator Media and Academic Computing
bnelson[at]cis.ysu.edu
---
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
Any word on this? Should I open a bug? I've got my foot in my mouth
after telling my group that samba supports DFS :-)
Thanks,
-Brian
Brian H. Nelson wrote:
Jeremy,
Files attached. Let me know if they're not what you need.
Just for fun I tried this with 3.0.28 as well. Same result.
-Brian
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System Administrator Media and Academic Computing
bnelson[at]cis.ysu.edu
---
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
Jeremy,
Files attached. Let me know if they're not what you need.
Just for fun I tried this with 3.0.28 as well. Same result.
-Brian
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:33:57PM -0400, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
I'm trying to create a DFS root in my 2003 AD domain, and point
NOT trying to make Samba a DFS root, just a host
(ie target) for a DFS root in my AD domain. Is Samba only capable of
hosting a samba-based DFS root, and not an AD based one? Is there some
trick to getting it configured?
Thanks!
-Brian
--
---
Brian H
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System Administrator Media and Academic Computing
bnelson[at]cis.ysu.edu
---
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https
It appears that at least the smb.conf man page on the samba site is
broken. Almost all of the attribute names are missing. I tried it in IE
and Firefox with the same result.
http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages-3/smb.conf.5.html
Am I missing something?
-Brian
--
To unsubscribe from
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Just to note, the next release will be numbered 3.2.0, and licenced
under GPLv3. It will contain was was to be 3.0.26.
Andrew Bartlett
Just out of curiosity, what happened to 3.1.0?
-Brian
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
like to figure out why
so I don't have problems in the future.
-Brian
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System Administrator Media and Academic Computing
bnelson[at]cis.ysu.edu
exits with status 0
smbd exits with status 0
START: Thu Jan 25 15:29:53 EST 2007 (./script/tests/selftest.sh)
END: Thu Jan 25 15:46:17 EST 2007 (./script/tests/selftest.sh)
TEST STATUS: 1
gmake: *** [test] Error 1
--
---
Brian H. Nelson
if 64bit would perform any better overall. My hunch would be
no, but perhaps someone else has already done the comparison.
Thanks,
-Brian
--
---
Brian H. Nelson Youngstown State University
System Administrator Media and Academic Computing
Hello,
First, let me state that I have attempted to search for this topic and
have only turned up other requests for the same issue. I couldn't find
anything even remotely helpful for a solution. So, if this is a common
issue, I apologize.
Anyways, on a WinXP client, opening the security
39 matches
Mail list logo