=
>
> Samba 4.0 source code is available now from the Samba Web site.
>
> http://www.samba.org
>
> About Active Directory
> ==
>
> Microsoft Windows and Active Directory are trademarks of Microsoft
> Corporation.
>
> About the Samba
i_connect
(ctx.drsuapi_handle, ctx.bind_supported_extensions) =
drs_utils.drs_DsBind(ctx.drsuapi)
File
"/usr/local/samba/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/samba/drs_utils.py",
line 144, in drs_DsBind
(info, handle) = drs.DsBind(misc.GUID(drsuapi.DRSUAPI_DS_BIND_GUID),
bind_inf
but I
will verify that.
So if a file is created outside samba I assume it will use the POSIX
dates right? That's confusing
Thanks,
Greg
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 12:44 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 03:41:04PM -0400, Greg Dickie wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
&g
-GREG]
smb: \> cd 54378-1
smb: \54378-1\> cd KOSRCFLM
smb: \54378-1\KOSRCFLM\> ls 1321-538.dpn
1321-538.dpn 387 Thu Sep 30 14:30:19
2010
4 blocks of size 262144. 3 blocks available
smb: \54378-1\KOSRCFLM\>
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Greg
t
> invasive and "just works" (does that need to be trademarked these
> days?). Since it hashes the SID with the same algorithm, all members
> get the same UID/GID mappings, which is a big win.
>
> Robert
>
> On 08/23/2010 05:21 PM, Greg Dickie wrote:
> > Hi,
ly question but what am I doing
wrong?
Thanks a lot,
Greg
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
10/02/05 22:55:18, 1] lib/util_pw.c:59(getpwnam_alloc)
>my extra debug: sys_getpwnam(WIN7HOST$) failed
> ^ *the name as passed to getpwnam_alloc*
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18, 1] auth/auth_util.c:577(make_server_info_sam)
>User WIN7HOST$ in passdb, but getpwnam() fails!
>
>
> rgds,
> graham.
>
>
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
.
thanks!
Greg
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 16:02 +, Chris Hall wrote:
> Greg Dickie wrote (on 15-Nov-2009 at 19:36)
> >Sorry in advance if this is a FAQ but I have not been watching the
> > list for a while. I have a customer who is foolish enough to want to use
> > windows 7
failure. I've seen postings that look related that seem to have been
fixed by moving to 3.3.6 but somehow I thought the new 3.4.3 would also
work. Is that not the case?
thanks,
Greg
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
?
Thanks alot,
Greg
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
Maximum Throughput
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
se parameter then smbd
dies on startup because its not there.
Any ideas on how to proceed?
Thanks,
Greg
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
Maximum Throughput
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Actually it was my much smarter colleagues that found this, I'm just the
mouth ;-)
Thanks for looking at this, I'll check out SAMBA_3_0 when I get back!
Greg
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:20:23PM -0400, Greg Dickie wrote:
OK all my gobbledy-gook stats aside.
eremy Allison wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:56:29AM -0400, Greg Dickie wrote:
Hey Jeremy,
Sorry, I'm at NAB in vegas and a little burned myself so we graph
output from /proc/diskstats when we test. If I run a test with 3.0.21c
the wio (field 7) and wblk (field 9) stats both show acti
e the amount
of write traffic.
Does that make any more sense?
Thanks,
Greg
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 10:24:37PM -0400, Greg Dickie wrote:
Perhaps another data point that might ring a bell. While using 3.0.21c
and monitoring direct IO vs. buffered IO (on XFS): if you see
previous revision and thought it was a problem of an extraneous sync
somewhere This might explain why you don't see this with your ram disk.
Thanks,
Greg
Greg Dickie wrote:
So this is testing 14a and SVN on the exact same machine with the exact
same configuration. The only difference is swit
, 2006-04-19 at 17:32 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 07:26:16PM -0400, Greg Dickie wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jeremy,
> >
> > Bad news I'm afraid. Doesn't seem to be much of a difference between
> > that svn checkout and 3.0.20. Thats
Thanks Volker, we'll try that, at least that may indicate where the
bottleneck is.
Greg
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 10:35 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 07:26:16PM -0400, Greg Dickie wrote:
> > Bad news I'm afraid. Doesn't seem to be much of a dif
gt; On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 01:05:43PM -0400, Greg Dickie wrote:
> >
> > Hey Jeremy,
> >
> > I think that just means 3 runs 1 reads, 1 writes and one 50-50. I
> > could have sworn I sent the config file already but here it is again
> > along with the binaries.
>
Absolutely! Checking it out and building now.
news ASAP.
Thanks alot,
Greg
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 11:20 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 01:05:43PM -0400, Greg Dickie wrote:
> >
> > Hey Jeremy,
> >
> > I think that just means 3 runs 1 reads
500, Greg Dickie wrote:
> >
> > Yes, it is the win32 version, but its an old one (1998), not sure how
> > the config file will carry to a more recent version.
> >
> >
> > IOmeter Access specifications:
> > Transfer req. size = 64Kb & 8Kb
> >
:49:02AM -0500, Greg Dickie wrote:
Yes, it is the win32 version, but its an old one (1998), not sure how
the config file will carry to a more recent version.
IOmeter Access specifications:
Transfer req. size = 64Kb & 8Kb
Percent of Access Specification = 100%
Type of Operation:
I am unfamiliar with cachegrind but I assume this is just a profiler. Do
you have to compile instrumentation into smbd?
Have fun in Boston, great city.
Greg
On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 09:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 09:49:02AM -0500, Greg Dickie wrote:
> >
ar 30, 2006 at 08:04:21PM -0500, Greg Dickie wrote:
> >
> > Hey Jeremy,
> >
> >
> > This happens when testing under iometer. I can give you the exact
> > paramaters if you want.
>
> That's the Win32 version ? If so, yes please the exact parameter
Hey Jeremy,
This happens when testing under iometer. I can give you the exact
paramaters if you want.
Thanks,
Greg
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 09:50 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:03:02AM -0500, Greg Dickie wrote:
> >
> > Suddenly occurred to me that
ot of
changes in there.
Can anyone think of what this could be?
Thanks,
Greg
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
Maximum Throughput
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
"
messages which I gather indicates a problem with kerberos. The server is
based on redhat 9 and so has MIT krb5 1.2.7. Is this supposed to work?
Thanks,
Greg
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
Maximum Throughput
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instr
o why would this happen?
THanks alot,
Greg
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
Maximum Throughput
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Windows without restarting either Samba3 or the whole server?
>
> it doesn't usually take more than a killall -HUP smbd
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
Maximum Throughput
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such
> object)ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP
> error: (No such object)ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the
> LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such object)ldapsam_search_one_group:
> Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (No such
> object)ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during +>
> adding entry for group Domain Admins failed!
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
directory has to be a
> sub-directory of the one with the media files.
>
> Is there a solution to my problem? I have a workaround that keeps the
> machines from interfering with each other -- but it's a little clunky and
> I'm seeking a more elegant solution.
643-512) -> root
> >System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) -> sysops
> >Replicators (S-1-5-32-552) -> replicat
> >Guests (S-1-5-32-546) -> guests
> >Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) -> powerusr
> >Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) -> printop
> >Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) -&
t; to
>
> > understanding how to tune these options and how various socket options
>
> settings
>
> > interact with other network settings and hardware.
> >
> > Andy Liebman
> > Resolute Films
> > 119 Braintree Street, Suite 410
> > Boston, MA 02134
> >
> > Tel: 617-782-0479
> > Cell: 617-308-0488
> > Fax: 617-782-1071
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
Maximum Throughput
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
that I have duplicate users on both my Linux machines and on my
> W2K domain, user1 in AD and user1 in /etc/passwd
>
> -dG
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Dickie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMA
/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1535)
> api_rpcTNP: called NETLOGON successfully
> [2003/12/16 18:53:21, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(544)
> free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 46
> [2003/12/16 18:53:21, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(81)
> 00 smb
t be what
you want.
> user= root
> server = /usr/local/samba/bin/swat
^^^
Is this the correct path for swat?
> log_on_failure += USERID
> }
>
> What else would you suggest? Remember I'm using Red Hat 7.3. That might
> help.
>
> "P
dmin group = @wheel, @smbuser
> domain logons = yes
> os level = 65
> preferred master = yes
> domain master = yes
> wins proxy = yes
> wins support = yes
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
00
> server and pay for it, and pay for the 5 licenses we will have to buy. HELP
> is much
> appreciated.
> THANKS
> "Phillip"
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
in2k box was
> mangled until recently and the DNS is also flaky (hence the move over to
> Samba). But I have to keep both domains up for the next little while
> (production environment) and then we will slowly migrate everyone over.
>
> Any thoughts would be appreciated.
>
> Jason
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
with wierd groups showing up.
>
> I happened to screw up the winbindd configuration without noticing causing
> it to crash, but I ran snmd and nmbd anyway and suddenly everything started
> working perfectly.
>
> The docs say you MUST run winbindd.
>
> I'm confu
Hi,
We are seeing errors like
change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain
on a server configured with winbind. wbinfo -t reports a good secret and we
can see groups and users. Any idea where this is coming from?
Thanks,
Greg
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
Maximum
5-73647866-3919785651-512
> sambaGroupType: 2
>
> but when I do a net groupmap command, I get this error over and over again:
>
>ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error:
> invalid DN (Invalid DN syntax)
>
> What DN syntax is being used for th
oot (2003)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQE/3j0fIR7qMdg1EfYRAj7MAJsGgy7eX8QEGw0+GppuIm1GDJEKnwCfehwt
> IEnuU6th2EbIe2IWmB1p1fs=
> =bods
> -END PGP SIGNATURE--
lways busted.
>
> Don't ya' hate it when that happens.
>
> Now you've probably jinx'd me, and next time it won't work although it
> always has. :)
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
Maximum Throughput
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
t;If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song" --Switchfoot (2003)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQE/3hbkIR7qMdg1EfYRAjXdAKC84daYNnSlRo0d6NK1BYpLkyaBkACaAo
Here's the wierd part though. I was just trying to reproduce the problem to
get some level 10 logs and now it seems to work (of course just when I want
it to screw-up ;-). So its not like its always busted.
thanks,
Greg
On Monday 15 December 2003 02:53 pm, Greg Dickie wrote:
> yup.
> Charles Hamel
>
> On 03-12-15, at 11:48, Greg Dickie wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm back on the list ;-)
> > I seem to be having some trouble getting W2K machines to join the
> > domain in
> > 3.0.1rc2. I haven't looked at this in detail since
: sambaSAMAccount
> >>objectClass: posixAccount
> >>uid: Administrator
> >>sambaLogonTime: 0
> >>sambaLogoffTime: 2147483647
> >>sambaKickoffTime: 2147483647
> >>sambaPwdCanChange: 0
> >>sambaHomePath: \\PDC\homes
> >>sambaHomeD
ng (there are
no passwords in the LDAP entry at this point). Perhaps an initialized
variable? Any help would be most appreciated.
regards,
Greg
--
Greg Dickie
just a guy
Maximum Throughput
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
48 matches
Mail list logo
