On 9 April 2010 16:21, James Cort wrote:
> On 9 April 2010 16:14, Volker Lendecke wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:11:26AM -0500, Bill Purcell wrote:
>>
>
>
>> > ==
>> > [10:05:44
Just been told the config file didn't appear in the email as it went out
(even though it certainly appears in the copy I've got), so I'm attaching
inline this time.
Oh, BTW: it's version 3.4.7 on Debian Lenny, installed from backports.
[global]
workgroup = U4EATECH
netbios name =
Hi,
I'm not entirely happy with the performance I'm seeing using Samba, and I
wonder if anyone can shine any light.
The server is a Dell PowerEdge 2950 with hardware RAID10, 4GB RAM and a
quad-core Intel Xeon processor. It's not live yet, so there's no load from
other tasks.
I've already elimin
I think this is a repeat of:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2509
Example 1 in that entry now works fine, but 2 continues to break 95% of
the time.
I'm happy to help narrow it further but I don't have the expertise to
dive into the codebase myself.
James.
--
To unsubscribe fro
check the rights on
libnss-ldap
libpam-ldap
set it to 644
I've upgraded the version of Samba to 3.0.20b and confirmed that the
new version does indeed have the patch listed in the bug report
applied, which it does. Unfortunately the problem persists.
My mistake - While the problem does
check the rights on
libnss-ldap
libpam-ldap
set it to 644
I've checked; they were already fine.
The problem I'm having seems to be the same as:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3047
I've upgraded the version of Samba to 3.0.20b and confirmed that the
new version does indeed have
I'm using Samba 3.0.14a as a PDC with an LDAP backend.
I am having trouble using the Windows "User Manager for Domains" tool.
As an example, I shall be looking at the "Domain Users" group. Whenever
I try modifying anybody's group membership, I get the error message:
"The following error occu
Quoting simo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 09:41 +, James Cort wrote:
Hi,
The Problem:
I have a samba domain using LDAP as the backend, complete with the
IdealX LDAP scripts.
Most of my Unix boxes (certainly anything which does any Samba stuff)
authenticates again
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I your log I see two problem or comment :
- Have you configured idealx-tools (smbldap.conf & smbldap_bind.conf)
Yes. I should mention that I can use Samba as a domain controller and
add workstations just fine provided I add workstations as root - but as
discussed e
Hi,
The Problem:
I have a samba domain using LDAP as the backend, complete with the
IdealX LDAP scripts.
Most of my Unix boxes (certainly anything which does any Samba stuff)
authenticates against the same LDAP backend, using it for groups and
users.
I need to grant some people sufficient
one what I probably should have done in the first place - set up a
Samba domain and got the offending server onto that. Seems to work now
(touch wood).
It'll give me a number of other benefits over and above solving the
initial problem, and it was something I was planning on doing anyway
Quoting William Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
From: James Cort
All the documentation I can find online seems to be geared towards
getting the system up and running properly in the first place with
minimal requirement of understanding of how it all hangs together - if
someone did that in th
baSID: S-1-5-21-4012146134-3166284455-2856603714-3038
sambaPrimaryGroupSID: S-1-5-21-4012146134-3166284455-2856603714-3001
displayName: James Cort,,,
sambaPwdMustChange: 2147483647
sambaPasswordHistory:
sambaAcctFlags: [U ]
fault).
The SID Windows displays is:
S-1-5-21-4012146134-3166284455-2856603714-3038
$ ldapsearch -D"cn=manager,dc=u4eatech,dc=com" -b "dc=u4eatech,dc=com"
-h localhost -W -v -x
# jamesc, People, u4eatech.com
dn: uid=jamesc,ou=People,dc=u4eatech,dc=com
uid: ja
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I've got a problem with a samba server I inherited which I can't solve.
I think it's the configuration rather than the version because I have
the same problem with a 3.0.14 and a 3.0.11 Samba server with almost
identical configurations. Both authenticate again
individual folders from Windows isn't terribly usable like this.
I'm not sure where to look next. The Samba server running 3.0.14 isn't
live yet, so I can do more-or-less what I like with the configuration.
The 3.0.11 server, however, is live, so I don't want to mess with the
16 matches
Mail list logo
