I heard (read) about the
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192
line that resolves some problems.
No, TCP_NODELAY is the standard setting for quite a while and setting
the buffers to 8K makes them smaller on most systems. And doesn't help.
smbfs is slow. And there is nothing s
Kevin Wheatley a écrit :
Holger Krull wrote:
Is there any patch (official/unofficial) available to fix this issue?
None that i know about. You could try using mount.cifs.
Arent there any changes needed for the samba server, just use other mount options?
No changes on t
Kevin Wheatley schrieb:
No changes on the server side. Just use mount -t cifs if you have that
in kernel or as module.
large readwrite = yes
From smb.conf man page:
This parameter determines whether or not smbd supports
the new 64k streaming read and write varient SMB
Holger Krull wrote:
> >>>Is there any patch (official/unofficial) available to fix this issue?
> >>
> >>None that i know about. You could try using mount.cifs.
> >
> > Arent there any changes needed for the samba server, just use other mount options?
>
> No changes on the server side. Just use mou
Is there any patch (official/unofficial) available to fix this issue?
None that i know about. You could try using mount.cifs.
Arent there any changes needed for the samba server, just use other mount options?
No changes on the server side. Just use mount -t cifs if you have that
in kernel or as mo
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 19:19:09 +0200
Holger Krull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bostjan Skufca @ domenca.com schrieb:
>
> > Is there any patch (official/unofficial) available to fix this issue?
>
> None that i know about. You could try using mount.cifs.
Arent there any changes needed for the samba
Bostjan Skufca @ domenca.com schrieb:
Is there any patch (official/unofficial) available to fix this issue?
None that i know about. You could try using mount.cifs.
Is anyone familiar with this issue?
Yes, this has been observed a lot.
It's as far as i know based on smb packet size.
smbfs will only
On Monday 04 October 2004 16:15, Bostjan Skufca @ domenca.com wrote:
> When using 1 client, it is 95% idle, when using 2 clients it is 85% idle.
>
> When using 2 clients the throughput roughly doubled (from ~4MB/s to ~8MB/s)
Sounds like network isn't utilized to full potential.
Rather strange, sa
Is there any patch (official/unofficial) available to fix this issue?
On Monday 04 of October 2004 15:46, Holger Krull wrote:
> Bostjan Skufca @ domenca.com schrieb:
> > When using 1 client, it is 95% idle, when using 2 clients it is 85% idle.
> >
> > When using 2 clients the throughput roughly d
Bostjan Skufca @ domenca.com schrieb:
When using 1 client, it is 95% idle, when using 2 clients it is 85% idle.
When using 2 clients the throughput roughly doubled (from ~4MB/s to ~8MB/s)
Is anyone familiar with this issue?
Yes, this has been observed a lot.
It's as far as i know based on smb packe
XP is not problematic, linux is
Regards,
Bostjan
On Monday 04 of October 2004 13:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Denis Vlasenko schrieb:
> >On Monday 04 October 2004 12:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>I haven't found anything useful googling around so I decided to ask here.
> >>
Denis Vlasenko schrieb:
On Monday 04 October 2004 12:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I haven't found anything useful googling around so I decided to ask here.
I have a Linux server running Samba on 100Mbit/s ethernet. If I connect to
it using WinXP, mount some share and download files from i
When using 1 client, it is 95% idle, when using 2 clients it is 85% idle.
When using 2 clients the throughput roughly doubled (from ~4MB/s to ~8MB/s)
PS: nice tool btw
On Monday 04 of October 2004 15:58, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Monday 04 October 2004 12:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hell
On Monday 04 October 2004 12:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I haven't found anything useful googling around so I decided to ask here.
>
> I have a Linux server running Samba on 100Mbit/s ethernet. If I connect to
> it using WinXP, mount some share and download files from it it reaches
>
Hello,
I haven't found anything useful googling around so I decided to ask here.
I have a Linux server running Samba on 100Mbit/s ethernet. If I connect to it
using WinXP, mount some share and download files from it it reaches about
9MB/s transfer rate. Using FTP gives even higher transfer ra
15 matches
Mail list logo
