I am having a problem with opening MS documents with Samba.
Error logs:
smbd/dfree.c:sys_disk_free(155) Warning : dfree is broken on this system
lib/sysquotoes.c:sys_get_quota(426) sys_path_to_bdev() failed for path [.]!
Has anyone seen this problem?
Leslie D. Haynes
Email: leslie.d.hay...@lmco.
Hi @ all,
we use samba as a fileserver on CentOS and an OpenLDAP server on Ubuntu 10.04.
The samba server shared only files, so we can access with the win7 clients (and
OpenLDAP credentials) to the files on the linux environment.
So after upgrade we don't can connected us to the samba share. I
Hi,
I am not sure if this is the right eMail-list to ask questions. I have
the problem that with a second connect to a samba share the user is
authenticated as guest. The first authentication was right done on my
own user account.
What i am doing wrong ?
Thansk
Michael
[2013/01/02 11:06:34.9
Greeting-
I have a mixed network of ms-windows, macintosh and freebsd systems.
I am setting up a FreeBSD 9.0 system as a PDC using samba.
I can from a FreeBSD box attach to the SMB server as a user that is defined
on the Samba Server.
[wynkoop@dt0 ~]$ smbclient -L hp1
Enter wynkoop's pa
On 8 February 2010 18:16, Alexandru Florescu wrote:
>>So I still have 'security = share' and I thought why it complained about
> authentication failure. In smbpasswd, passwords are encrypted,
>>but in my general config I had 'encrypt passwords = no' and that's why it
> didn't work. I changed it to
>So I still have 'security = share' and I thought why it complained about
authentication failure. In smbpasswd, passwords are encrypted,
>but in my general config I had 'encrypt passwords = no' and that's why it
didn't work. I changed it to yes.
"Funny" thing is that I can access the share from a
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 05:26:37PM +0200, Alexandru Florescu wrote:
> "I want to achieve the following setup:
> - have a share that is read-only and accessible for guest users; => without
> having to log in.
> - have the same share be modified by an authenticated specific user."
[global]
security
>> >I don't think you want "security = share".
>> >--
>> >Michael Wood
>>
>> But I do want security = share.
>Why?
>
>Volker
I did state my reasons in the first mail:
"I want to achieve the following setup:
- have a share that is read-only and accessible for guest users; => without
having to
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 11:12:32AM +0200, Alexandru Florescu wrote:
> >I don't think you want "security = share".
> >--
> >Michael Wood
>
> But I do want security = share.
Why?
Volker
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/
>> I want to achieve the following setup:
>>
>> - have a share that is read-only and accessible for guest users;
>>
>> - have the same share be modified by an authenticated specific user.
>>
>> This is running on debian lenny, samba 3.2.5.
>>
>> My smb.conf is as follows:
>>
>> [global]
>> workg
Hi Michael, finally I have found the solution.
So I still have 'security = share' and I thought why it complained about
authentication failure. In smbpasswd, passwords are encrypted,
but in my general config I had 'encrypt passwords = no' and that's why it
didn't work. I changed it to yes.
So my [g
I believe the OP wants a solution for his variation of config which
should work but it does not.
I can only share my experience with upgrade to version 3.4.5. It was a
test upgrade so I did not log every change I did on server. However I
was receiving the same error and I did the following:
1. Ad
On 8 February 2010 11:12, Alexandru Florescu wrote:
>
>>> I want to achieve the following setup:
>>>
>>> - have a share that is read-only and accessible for guest users;
>>>
>>> - have the same share be modified by an authenticated specific user.
>>>
>>> This is running on debian lenny, samba 3.2.
On 8 February 2010 01:58, Alex Florescu wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I want to achieve the following setup:
>
> - have a share that is read-only and accessible for guest users;
>
> - have the same share be modified by an authenticated specific user.
>
> This is running on debian lenny, samba 3.2.5.
>
Hi everyone,
I want to achieve the following setup:
- have a share that is read-only and accessible for guest users;
- have the same share be modified by an authenticated specific user.
This is running on debian lenny, samba 3.2.5.
My smb.conf is as follows:
[global]
workgroup = WOR
Christoph Kaminski wrote:
realm = chaos.local
Shouldn't this be UPPER case?
--
Diego Zuccato
Servizi Informatici
Dip. di Astronomia - Università di Bologna
Via Ranzani, 1 - 40126 Bologna - Italy
tel.: +39 051 20 95786
mail: diego.zucc...@unibo.it
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the
Hi!
I can Join, wbinfo -u etc works but getent passwd doesnt...
I think the problem is: get this error:
'get_dc_list: preferred server list: ", *"'
but why does it not know my domain? (already joined)
Can someone help?
Greetz
Conf:
#GLOBAL PARAMETERS
[global]
workgroup = CHAOS
realm = c
Hi all, I am testing Windows 7 Ult with Samba 3.4.3 as a PDC for Windows
7. I am using a simple, smb.conf file, domain name is "mygroup" without
the quotations. Windows XP clients can join correctly and login as
normal. However, with Windows 7, I can get the client to joint the
domain, but when
...@gmail.com]
Enviado el: viernes, 11 de septiembre de 2009 20:24
Para: Carlos Gonzalo Cruz; samba
Asunto: Re: [Samba] Problems with samba and domain controller
> I have a problem with Samba and a Domain Controller. I have a server which
> it was running with samba and a Windows Server 2000 domain cont
> I have a problem with Samba and a Domain Controller. I have a server which
> it was running with samba and a Windows Server 2000 domain controller, and
> it’s was worked correctly. Now the domain controller has been changed for a
> Windows Server 2008 and now it doesn’t work. I need your help to
HI!!
I have a problem with Samba and a Domain Controller. I have a server which
it was running with samba and a Windows Server 2000 domain controller, and
its was worked correctly. Now the domain controller has been changed for a
Windows Server 2008 and now it doesnt work. I need your help to
HI!!
I have a problem with Samba and a Domain Controller. I have a server which
it was running with samba and a Windows Server 2000 domain controller, and
its was worked correctly. Now the domain controller has been changed for a
Windows Server 2008 and now it doesnt work. I need your help to
HI!!
I have a problem with Samba and a Domain Controller. I have a server which
it was running with samba and a Windows Server 2000 domain controller, and
its was worked correctly. Now the domain controller has been changed for a
Windows Server 2008 and now it doesnt work. I need your help to
Volker Lendecke schreibte:
"Encountered an unexpected requestValue sequence element tag."
That one should be fixed in 3.4.1. See bug 5886.
Patch applied - problem solved
"pdb_default_create_user: failed to create a new user structure:
NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER"
This can happen when you hav
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:41:00PM +0200, Ralf Hornik Mailings wrote:
> "ldapsam_modify_entry: LDAP Password could not be changed for user
> admin: Invalid syntax"
> "Encountered an unexpected requestValue sequence element tag."
That one should be fixed in 3.4.1. See bug 5886.
>
> The workaroun
Hi List,
I compiled Samba 3.4 for Opensolaris because the samba SUNWsmba
shipped my SFW did not work properly.
Now I had to realize, that the Problems are still there so I beleve
that it is a common Problem with Solaris (?)
I have samba running as PDC with a Sun Directory Server as backen
I have a D-Link DNS-323 NAS Drive which I'm accessing from a desktop PC
running Ubuntu 8.10. When I first mount the DNS-323 share, everything is
hunky-dory. I can access folders and files and save them. However, when my
desktop PC has returned from standby I have problems saving files, which
manif
This is a really weird one. To the ( XP Pro ) client, I can join the domain,
but can never log in. I've looked all over for a troubleshooting guide, but
none have found the problem.
Help!!!
System: samba 3.3.4 on 64 bit debian lenny patched to current. Gigabit lan
environment.
When Joining th
Heikki Manninen wrote:
I'm unabe to use idmap_ad and sfu nss info with Samba on AIX. The
configuration as it is works on a Linux build.
workgroup = DOMAIN
realm = DOMAIN.TLD
server string = SERVER
security = ADS
idmap domains = DOMAIN
idmap config
I'm unabe to use idmap_ad and sfu nss info with Samba on AIX. The
configuration as it is works on a Linux build.
workgroup = DOMAIN
realm = DOMAIN.TLD
server string = SERVER
security = ADS
idmap domains = DOMAIN
idmap config DOMAIN:default = yes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm very despaired. Trying to join a Domain I also get an error: "Domain not
> reachable".
> But to my mind the samba-configuration is ok. The logs give no hint to an
> error. testparm smb.conf works fine.
> I created a sho
I'm very despaired. Trying to join a Domain I also get an error: "Domain not
reachable".
But to my mind the samba-configuration is ok. The logs give no hint to an
error. testparm smb.conf works fine.
I created a shortcut to logon on server, that works. (via ip and via name). But
i cannot join th
is your WINS server work fine ?
what says a nmblookup.
---
Stéphane PURNELLE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Service Informatique Corman S.A. Tel : 00 32 087/342467
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit sur
14/03/2008 13:53:18 :
> I think there ar
I think there are no issues with the client machine, because nothing has
changed.i tried to repeat the process to register a clientmachine in the
domain, but it failed.
the role of my samba-server is: ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC.
Are you sure there are no issues with the client machine?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you sure there are no issues with the client machine?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I administrate a server (debian etch) on which runs samba, version 3.0.24-6et. Everything worked fine until today. I tried to logon on the server via a clientmachine (win2k, winxp), but i got an error, "Syste
Hi,
I administrate a server (debian etch) on which runs samba, version 3.0.24-6et.
Everything worked fine until today. I tried to logon on the server via a
clientmachine (win2k, winxp), but i got an error, "System cannot logon because
domain not reachable". (it is possible to ping the server a
I'm currently investigating an issue like this - basically, a customer
of ours is using Vista SP1, and transferring large files. The
transfer is interrupted - the interruptions appear to correlate to
these entries in samba.log:
sloisn01-1: [2008/01/14 16:33:46, 0, pid=77015, effective(0, 0
Hello all,
I'm having some trouble getting my Debian-based NAS running correctly
with Samba permissions.
For trouble-shooting purposes, I have three machines of interest:
--MACHINE A: NAS (running Debian/2.6), the machine I want to share
folders
--MACHINE B: Windows Vista: Samba read/write share
Hi All,
sorry about this, but i don't know where to take some help about it, then I
will try you.
I am having a freaking error with samba.
I set the samba security level to share, but it still asking for a password
(konqueror and dolphin) and windows machines says that can't have permission
to acce
Yesterday i installed then new SP1 RC for Microsoft Vista Enterprise,
Since then I cant connect to our samba server any more.
Samba is configured as ad member, with winbind and idmap backend = rid.
Has anyone the same Problem ?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Michael Mössler
uhb consu
I have version 5 installed, that was just the output of klist
Ya i have followed that and still no luck. Accually, now im getting
different errors! GAH!
When i try to connect after restarting the services, the logfile seems to
show its passing the domain FEDORAFTP.which makes NO sence
[200
Thanks, but now it throws a different error :(
>From log of computer tryin to connect to the share
[2007/12/28 13:40:54, 3]
libads/kerberos_verify.c:ads_secrets_verify_ticket(279)
ads_secrets_verify_ticket: enc type [23] failed to decrypt with error
Decrypt integrity check failed
[2007/12/28 13
Afternoon!
Let me apologize first if this is something s simple, but i have been
working on this for days and I'm still stuck on one part.
Where to start. Small user environment (under 100 users) using Active
Directory on Win 2k3 server. Running Fedora 8 on a server, and I am trying
to get
I'll have to see if I can dig up my notes, but I saw this as well and
was able to fix it. Can you post your smb.conf?
Aaron Kincer
On Nov 5, 2007 10:30 AM, Bruno Pirajá Moyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everybody, i have use samba (3.0) as a PDC in my company. The file
> tree was growing s
Hello everybody, i have use samba (3.0) as a PDC in my company. The file
tree was growing so a had to use POSIX ACLs for the file permissions.
The problem is when a user creates a new file or modify an existing one,
the ACLs turn to a mess. For example, i have a dir where the users of a
group h
Good day,
I'm having issues with a small company with the following setup...
1. Windows 2003 active directory server (server.company.local)
2. samba 3.0.25 linux server (serve2.company.local)
3. windows xp and windows 2000 professional clients. All clients are part
of the ads structure.
What's ha
On 6/20/07, Dale Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the [global] section, try changing
valid users = root
to
valid users =
Dale
Good spot, That will surely cause problems...
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists
In the [global] section, try changing
valid users = root
to
valid users =
Dale
Personal Técnico wrote:
Hi!!
We are trying to configure a Debian Linux Server as Samba Server
(Domain Controller) and a Windows XP (with Service Pack 2) as client.
We have configured Windows into the Samb
John Drescher escribió:
Is this preventing the user from logging on or loading their profile?
profile acls = No
If it is loading their profile I believe this may be your problem as I
had the same problem a few months ago. Set that to yes. The reason for
this is that WinXPSP2 checks the
Is this preventing the user from logging on or loading their profile?
profile acls = No
If it is loading their profile I believe this may be your problem as I
had the same problem a few months ago. Set that to yes. The reason for
this is that WinXPSP2 checks the credentials of the profi
Hi!!
We are trying to configure a Debian Linux Server as Samba Server (Domain
Controller) and a Windows XP (with Service Pack 2) as client. We have
configured Windows into the Samba Domain (in other words, we have been
able to agregate the machine into the domain), but when we restart
Windows
Hi folks,
Be gentle - first time I've posted to this list! ;-) I'll try and be
complete. If I missed something, please let me know. I've googled and
found some information, but nothing *quite* relevant.
Running Fedora Core 6. Been using Samba for a long time, it's always
been problem fre
[Second try]
I've asked this almost everywhere else, so obviously I only find out about
this list now (my doing, too).
I am running VMWare Workstation on top of host CentOS 4.4 Plus on a Dell
Precision 390 with 2G of main memory. Under VMWare, I am running a Windows
XP guest OS. I have a simil
I've asked this almost everywhere else, so obviously I only find out about
this list now (my doing, too).
I am running VMWare Workstation on top of host CentOS 4.4 Plus on a Dell
Precision 390 with 2G of main memory. Under VMWare, I am running a Windows
XP guest OS. I have a similar setup at ho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale,
Thanks - I think that has taken care of the permissions problems.
Question: Is there a reason the bdc needs direct communications with the
ldap database? I would have imagined these queries could be retrieved
via communication between smbd.
Bi
I believe your errors primarily lie in your BDC configuration.
See http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/samba-bdc.html#id304335
for minimum requirements.
Bill Schwanitz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am trying to get a samba setup with with a pdc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am trying to get a samba setup with with a pdc/bdc configuration. The
backend information stores are openldap ( for passdb and idmap )
I have followed the instructions in the Samba Guide and the
documentation provided with the smbldap-tools package.
Greetings,
I have been working on installing Samba -3.0.23d on Solaris 10. I have
been able to run configure, make, make install after many attempts. I
have also setup our Samba server to authenticate off of Active directory
using MIT Kerberos and OpenLdap, OpenSSl. Unfortunately, I forgot to
i
Hello,
We have a RedHat3 server, with some NFS mounts to Solaris9 servers.
That works nicely. We also run samba on top of that, for Windows
access to the NFS shares. Works fine.
However, on a RedHat4 system, using the exact same mount, we
experience odd behavior. I can access the shares throu
Hi, Volker,
It´s been a while since I´ve sent this topic to the list, but here goes an
update to it ..
We have reinstalled our server with Fedora Core 3, 32 bit version,
samba-3.0.8-0.pre1.3, and Squid-2.5.STABLE-12, all with the same
configurations as in the Fedora Core 5 installation, and ever
I cannot seem to get it to listen to any ports on my server.My
configeration is as bellow:
[global]
workgroup = mygroup
server string = Control Center
interfaces = eth0
null passwords = Yes
pam password change = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:17:44PM -0300, Carlos Zottmann wrote:
> OK, I´ll try that ... If it doesn´t work, how could we increase the number
> of client connections accepted by winbind?
By recompiling. But as I see it, more than 200 active
connections point to problems in other areas. I suspect t
OK, I´ll try that ... If it doesn´t work, how could we increase the number
of client connections accepted by winbind?
Thanks again,
Carlos.
2006/6/16, Volker Lendecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:22:52PM -0300, Carlos Zottmann wrote:
> What could we do to solve the winbind p
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:22:52PM -0300, Carlos Zottmann wrote:
> What could we do to solve the winbind problem, as stated in
> /var/log/messages?
>
> winbindd: Exceeding 200 client connections, no idle connection found
H. My proposal was exactly in that direction. Each ntlm
helper opens a w
What could we do to solve the winbind problem, as stated in
/var/log/messages?
winbindd: Exceeding 200 client connections, no idle connection found
Regards,
Carlos.
2006/6/16, Volker Lendecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:05:17PM -0300, Carlos Zottmann wrote:
> auth_param nt
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:05:17PM -0300, Carlos Zottmann wrote:
> auth_param ntlm program /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=
> squid-2.5-ntlmssp
> auth_param ntlm children 60
60 children don't help at all here, winbind for ntlm
authentication is fully serialized. So in theory one child
should
Hi !!
Thanks for answering !!
Our Squid configuration, regarding ntlm, is the following:
auth_param ntlm program /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --helper-protocol=
squid-2.5-ntlmssp
auth_param ntlm children 60
auth_param ntlm max_challenge_reuses 100
auth_param ntlm max_challenge_lifetime 20 minutes
auth_pa
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 08:11:30PM -0300, Carlos Zottmann wrote:
> [2006/06/14 13:42:50, 0] nsswitch/winbindd.c:process_loop(863)
> winbindd: Exceeding 200 client connections, no idle connection found
How many ntlm auth helpers do you have configured in your
squid?
Volker
pgp0INcfNiSta.pgp
De
Hi !!
I have already sent this message to the list, but, as I have not received
any replies, I am trying again !!
We are facing some problems with Samba 3.0.22 (installed from rpms) and
Fedora Core 5, 64 bits. We are basically using samba as a resource for squid
(2.5 stable13), so it can be able
Hi !!
We are facing some problems with Samba 3.0.22 (installed from rpms) and
Fedora Core 5, 64 bits. We are basically using samba as a resource for squid
(2.5 stable13), so it can be able to use ntlm authentication, through
winbind.
After some time running, squid stops responding do requests, a
I am using Samba on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine.
I just updated to the newest version of Samba (3.0.21b,1) available in
the ports system. The old version was working fine, but since there were
a number of ports that I had that were out dated, I simply updated them
all.
The problem is that Samba does no
f SMB signing here, and it is off by default anywway
Andrew Bartlett
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jaccon
> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 3:48 AM
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: [Samba] Problems with Samb
Dunno. I know macs use samba 2.0 which don't support smb signing.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jaccon
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 3:48 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Problems with Samba 3.0.20b and OS X 1
Hi, i have the Samba Server 3.0.20b running Debian 3.1 Sarge and clients
with Mac Os X 10.4.3, after update to 10.4.3 version while the clients copy
via Finder to Samba volume, after copy the files hide in directory.
The others clients running Mac Os X 10.4.3, dont see the files but the Linux
Work
I've some problem with the configuration of two samba server.
I've two PC, a laptot with debian etch samba 3.0.20b (PC2) wich with
security=user always give me timeout, with security=share it works.
The second a little home server with debian sarge (stable) samba 3.0.14a that
with security=user
I've some problem with the configuration of two samba server.
I've two PC, a laptot with debian etch samba 3.0.20b (PC2) wich with
security=user always give me timeout, with security=share it works.
The second a little home server with debian sarge (stable) samba 3.0.14a that
with security=user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manuel Graumann schrieb:
> There are two problems I have with Samba
>
> My system: Suse Linux, Kernel version 2.6.12.5, Samba version
> 3.0.20-0.1-SUSE
>
> 1st problem: If I put my outlook.pst on my Samba server and tell my Outlook
> to use the net
There are two problems I have with Samba
My system: Suse Linux, Kernel version 2.6.12.5, Samba version
3.0.20-0.1-SUSE
1st problem: If I put my outlook.pst on my Samba server and tell my Outlook
to use the network path to it, it screws up after some weeks. The file is
about 240 MB large but I don
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 10:48, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:46:34AM -0700, eric roseme wrote:
> > JHT -
> >
> > Would this topic be worthy of addition to the Howto? I think I sent you
> > a lengthy whitepaper about TS, along with all of the workarounds. You
> > could pu
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:46:34AM -0700, eric roseme wrote:
> JHT -
>
> Would this topic be worthy of addition to the Howto? I think I sent you
> a lengthy whitepaper about TS, along with all of the workarounds. You
> could pull out pertinent passages like the MS Q-article and hotfix
> verbi
JHT -
Would this topic be worthy of addition to the Howto? I think I sent you
a lengthy whitepaper about TS, along with all of the workarounds. You
could pull out pertinent passages like the MS Q-article and hotfix
verbiage. (if you want to)
Eric Roseme
Hewlett-Packard
Lorenzo Pilotti wr
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:20:41AM +0200, Lorenzo Pilotti wrote:
a customer currently uses a Suse 9.2 pro with the last version of Samba to
share a folder containing data for an Enterprise Management program (Windows
based).
everything works fine with local clients (ma
thanks fellows,
the M$ patch seems to work fine...
ya guruz! ;-)
loris
>It's possible to set a registry setting that causes TS to open a new
>SMB connection for every logged on user, this should help if the problem
>is requests getting stuck in smbd's single threaded queue. The TS client
>has so
von Jeremy Allison
Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Oktober 2005 18:12
An: Lorenzo Pilotti
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] problems with samba 3 and termnal server
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:20:41AM +0200, Lorenzo Pilotti wrote:
>
> a customer currently uses a Suse 9.2 pro with th
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:20:41AM +0200, Lorenzo Pilotti wrote:
>
> a customer currently uses a Suse 9.2 pro with the last version of Samba to
> share a folder containing data for an Enterprise Management program (Windows
> based).
>
> everything works fine with local clients (many 98s and 1 XP
Hi there,
I have some problems with a samba server (v. 3.0.14a installed on gentoo
linux 2005.1), which is a domain member server in an windows 2003 active
directory domain.
The authentication works fine, and when I set the permissions on the
Linux side for a certain user on a certain folder, he
hello folks
dont know if this is a faq:
a customer currently uses a Suse 9.2 pro with the last version of Samba to
share a folder containing data for an Enterprise Management program (Windows
based).
everything works fine with local clients (many 98s and 1 XP machine).
we have some (15) clients
I'm trying out samba for the first time as a PDC for a
Windows domain with XP SP2 clients. After working
through a few kinks I figured out how to add machines
and users to my centeral samba server and get the
machines to join, etc. Eveything seemed to work fine,
but I'm discovering strange bugs wit
Hello NG,
I installed sucessfully the packages, sambaldaptools,
samba-console-1.1.31-1, openldap2-2.2.15-5.1, samba 3.07 for an idealx
management console samba-console.
My sytem is suse 9.2 Server and clients, and XP clients. I configured the
Sambaconsole like described
in/usr/share/doc/packa
may be the following helps:
instead of editing /etc/pam.d/login, change only
/etc/pam.d/system-auth. there are othersmall changes that you need to
do in the indivisual files too.
here are mine:
/etc/pam.d/system-auth:
#%PAM-1.0
# This file is auto-generated.
# User changes will be destroyed the ne
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 1:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] Problems with Samba and Windows 2003 Active Domain Server
Need more info..
What version of samba and kerberos are you running?
What does your /etc/nsswitch.conf
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark A. Holm
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 1:05 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Problems with Samba and Windows 2003 Active Domain
Server
Can somebody with experience making a RedHat Fedora Core 3 server with
Samba installed work in a Windows 2003 Active Domain
Can somebody with experience making a RedHat Fedora Core 3 server with Samba
installed work in a Windows 2003 Active Domain please
give me some pointers? I have a small installation with one Windows 2003 Server
running as a domain controller for about 10 Windows
XP machines. This is working just
Thanks! Setting spnego = yes worked perfectly!
> We're running Fedora Core and Samba-3.0.8-0.pre1.3 and we're
authenticating
> our Windows XP users against Active Directory running on Windows 2003.
> Everything works fine!
>
> But now we're trying to secure and harden our WinXP machines and now
> We're running Fedora Core and Samba-3.0.8-0.pre1.3 and we're
authenticating
> our Windows XP users against Active Directory running on Windows 2003.
> Everything works fine!
>
> But now we're trying to secure and harden our WinXP machines and now when
> any user logged into a secured WinXP th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Microsoft network client: Digitally sign
| communications (always) If we set this to Disabled
| it works again.
|
...
| Doesn't Samba support this?
Yes. It should work. Please retest against 3.0.11 and
open a bug report at h
We're running Fedora Core and Samba-3.0.8-0.pre1.3 and we're authenticating
our Windows XP users against Active Directory running on Windows 2003.
Everything works fine!
But now we're trying to secure and harden our WinXP machines and now when
any user logged into a secured WinXP they get the erro
Any more updates for the printing issues and Samba 3.0.9? Do the patches
for 3.0.10 apply for 3.0.9?
Thanks.
Marc
On 1/11/05 10:13 AM, "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jerome Borsboom wrote:
> | The one line patch I sent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jerome Borsboom wrote:
| The one line patch I sent to this list yesterday, seems to have
| solved our problems with retention of print jobs after printing.
Really ? If so that would be great. But could you confirm
with me again after its been running
The one line patch I sent to this list yesterday, seems to have
solved our problems with retention of print jobs after printing.
Regards,
Jerome
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
