Re: SV: [Samba] Samba-Citrix compatability

2003-11-04 Thread John H Terpstra
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Eric Roseme wrote: > John and/or Andrew, > > I created some slides diagraming this issue in simplistic terms for > Microsoft management when I was attempting to persuede them to uncomment > the MultipleUsersOnConnection code from the W2000 redirector (to no > avail). If you th

Re: SV: [Samba] Samba-Citrix compatability

2003-11-04 Thread Eric Roseme
John and/or Andrew, I created some slides diagraming this issue in simplistic terms for Microsoft management when I was attempting to persuede them to uncomment the MultipleUsersOnConnection code from the W2000 redirector (to no avail). If you think that they could be useful for officially do

Re: SV: [Samba] Samba-Citrix compatability

2003-11-04 Thread John H Terpstra
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: John H Terpstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I have searched for some FAQ/HOWTO regarding Citrix/Metaframe to no > > > avail. (Like this one > > > http://samba.org/~jht/HOWTO/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf ) > > > What I would like to see in such

Re: SV: [Samba] Samba-Citrix compatability

2003-11-04 Thread perkjetil.grotnes
From: John H Terpstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I have searched for some FAQ/HOWTO regarding Citrix/Metaframe to no > > avail. (Like this one > > http://samba.org/~jht/HOWTO/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf ) > > What I would like to see in such a FAQ/HOWTO: > Are you willing to help write this?

Re: SV: [Samba] Samba-Citrix compatability

2003-11-04 Thread perkjetil.grotnes
>Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On each of our Citrix servers we can have up to 100 users all > > connecting to 10 shares on the samba server = 1000 connections > > 'services' for that one citrix server? > I know all this. Now all I need is for you to write it up in > bugzilla.samba.org so we can re

Re: SV: [Samba] Samba-Citrix compatability

2003-11-04 Thread John H Terpstra
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have searched for some FAQ/HOWTO regarding Citrix/Metaframe to no > avail. (Like this one > http://samba.org/~jht/HOWTO/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf ) > > What I would like to see in such a FAQ/HOWTO: Are you willing to help write this? You too can m

Re: SV: [Samba] Samba-Citrix compatability

2003-11-04 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:46:00AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - Compilation issues regarding Citrix/metaframe > > > - - ie the need to increase the MAX_CONNECTION setting before > > > compilation > > Please file a bug against this. Th

Re: SV: [Samba] Samba-Citrix compatability

2003-11-04 Thread perkjetil.grotnes
> From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - Compilation issues regarding Citrix/metaframe > > - - ie the need to increase the MAX_CONNECTION setting before > > compilation > Please file a bug against this. There is no valid reson for > us to allow 2^16 session setups, but only 2^8 tr

Re: SV: [Samba] Samba-Citrix compatability

2003-11-04 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:11:00AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have searched for some FAQ/HOWTO regarding Citrix/Metaframe to no > avail. (Like this one > http://samba.org/~jht/HOWTO/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf ) > > What I would like to see in such a FAQ/HOWTO: > > - Compilation issues r

SV: [Samba] Samba-Citrix compatability

2003-11-04 Thread perkjetil.grotnes
I have searched for some FAQ/HOWTO regarding Citrix/Metaframe to no avail. (Like this one http://samba.org/~jht/HOWTO/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf ) What I would like to see in such a FAQ/HOWTO: - Compilation issues regarding Citrix/metaframe - - ie the need to increase the MAX_CONNECTION setting

Re: [Samba] Samba-Citrix compatability

2003-11-04 Thread Hansjoerg Maurer
Hi thank you for this great explanation. We have similar problems with Citrix and a netapp NAS device and I am wondering, if this may have the same reason This is not related to samba... But your explanation of the original problem may be a good input... Thank you very much. greetings Hans

Re: [Samba] Samba-Citrix compatability

2003-11-03 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 02:28:11PM +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Andrew Bartlett wrote on Tuesday, 4 November 2003 2:20 p.m.: > > But more > > importantly, there is an issue caused by the way Windows Terminal > > Server clients connect - they all use the same smbd. This causes all > > their opera

RE: [Samba] Samba-Citrix compatability

2003-11-03 Thread Paul Eggleton
Andrew Bartlett wrote on Tuesday, 4 November 2003 2:20 p.m.: > But more > importantly, there is an issue caused by the way Windows Terminal > Server clients connect - they all use the same smbd. This causes all > their operations to be serialised, even worse if something blocks. Can you expl

Re: [Samba] Samba-Citrix compatability

2003-11-03 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:55:25AM +1100, DAVIES Rob wrote: > G'day, > > We are having problems when connecting to our Solaris 8 server Zeus > from our Windows 2000 Terminal Servers. I think you might be hitting two of the nastiest bugs with that combination. Firstly, there are issues with Solar

[Samba] Samba-Citrix compatability

2003-11-03 Thread DAVIES Rob
G'day, We are having problems when connecting to our Solaris 8 server Zeus from our Windows 2000 Terminal Servers. We are running Samba 2.2.8a on the unix box and are finding that from time to time people are having difficulty opening files from shares on this server. They also have difficulty