What does the [global] config look like?
On 11/14/2012 8:55 AM, Amanda Gomes wrote:
David, thanks again.
As previously mentioned, I can not allow the file owner erase what
he created in the folder, so I apply the "create mask = 0555" in the
first option.
Dale, thanks for the response.
Amanda,
You can elevate a user's privileges by using the "admin users"
parameter, e.g., "admin users = user1, @group2"
Also, I believe the syntax in your second option should be ==> "force
group = supervisors" if you wish to go that route.
Dale
On 11/12/2012 3:44 PM, Amanda Gomes wrote:
D
Dear,
We are integrating Samba with Active Directory in the company. The goal
is to provide a samba share to users of AD. In this case, we need all users
to write on the share, but nobody modify or delete any files. Even the user
who owns it.
With this, we would create only one AD user, if
Yes, it is normal. The client is free to connect and
disconnect to shares as many times as it chooses. But it
should never happen that from one smbd the script is run
more than once simultaneously.
Ok, thanks for clearing that up so quickly. :-)
MJ
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the fol
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:17:02PM +0100, mourik jan heupink wrote:
> In a normal situation, should I expect a [global] root preexec
> script to be run only ONCE per user logon?
>
> I have set some logging in my root preexec script, and have noticed
> that usually it will be run only once on the s
Hi all,
In a normal situation, should I expect a [global] root preexec script to
be run only ONCE per user logon?
I have set some logging in my root preexec script, and have noticed that
usually it will be run only once on the share IPC$.
However, SOMETIMES I also see it executed on different
To put it simple id like to give our Domain Admins the same access to
Samba shares that the root user has and havent had much luck doing
this. Whenever I look this up I find that people are doing this
different ways but none seem to work. The only other thing that ive
seen people doing is add
To put it simple id like to give our Domain Admins the same access to
Samba shares that the root user has and havent had much luck doing this.
Whenever I look this up I find that people are doing this different ways
but none seem to work. The only other thing that ive seen people doing
is addin
John H Terpstra wrote:
On 06/15/2010 04:50 PM, Andrew Masterson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Allen Chen
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 2:25 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] root postexec
On 06/15/2010 04:50 PM, Andrew Masterson wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org
> [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Allen Chen
> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 2:25 PM
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: [Samba] roo
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Allen Chen
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 2:25 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] root postexec issue on both Samba 3.4.5 and 3.0.28
Hi, there
I'm using Samba 3.4.
Hi, there
I'm using Samba 3.4.5 and 3.0.28 on RHEL 5.2, and I noticed that on both
samba servers
'root postexec' script in [netlogon] is executed automatically when
logged in for around 11 minutes.
This makes me crazy to track when a use is logged out.
The man page smb.conf.5 says:
" postexec
I think I answer more questions than I ask here, but now it's my turn - I
can't seem to figure out what I should change here, and it don't make no
sense to me .
I have a samba fileserver. I am not using winbind. I am using NIS for
UID/GID lookup. I am using AD via Kerberos for authentication
Looks like removing `admin users = @"BUILTIN\administrators"` helped,
so its solved. The only reason I've added that line so non-domain
admins can manage groups on that machine but it seems simply adding
them to BUILTIN\administrators is sufficient. Thank you for helping me
with this.
--Vlad
On T
Hi,
I'm dealing with the same issue so I thought I'd share a few ideas I've
found so far.
"write users=" should just be letting those users write as themselves.
Its the "admin users=" line that is intervening and mapping them to root.
If its just the need for admin rights, I know that there
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 03:28:07PM -0600, Vladimir Shved wrote:
> I have samba server on windows domain, in ADS mode but have problem
> tracking files that belong to admin users, anytime new file created
> the default owner is root. For non-admin users its normal, newly
> created files have correct
Hello,
I have samba server on windows domain, in ADS mode but have problem
tracking files that belong to admin users, anytime new file created
the default owner is root. For non-admin users its normal, newly
created files have correct ownership permissions. Its possible for a
user to go and take ow
On Friday 07 March 2008, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> It would be nice if this complained at all or warned you in testparm
I've often wished that the appropriately named "testparm" was better at
testing the values, and not just the parameters.
--
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 04:44:15PM -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I'm reposting this as no one has responded. Is there something in here
>> in particular that would have
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 04:44:15PM -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm reposting this as no one has responded. Is there something in here
> in particular that would have caused a problem? I guess I use multiple
> commands, but there is no use of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm reposting this as no one has responded. Is there something in here
in particular that would have caused a problem? I guess I use multiple
commands, but there is no use of % variables inside my one script that
formats the date.
Jeremy Allison wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:04:25AM -0800, Robert wrote:
>
>> Is this perhaps related to the folowing bug:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4812
>
> Yes, this is certainly it. We're not going to
> fix this thoug
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:04:25AM -0800, Robert wrote:
> Is this perhaps related to the folowing bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4812
Yes, this is certainly it. We're not going to
fix this though - the security change was painful enough
that I don't feel safe in allowing arb
> Same
here.
I
change
the
root
preexec
=
script.sh
> And
in
the
script.sh
I
put
everything
that
you
do...
> I don't
know
why
this
stop
working
when
I
upgrade
too.
Is this perhaps related to the folowing bug:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4812
___
Same here. I change the root preexec = script.sh
And in the script.sh I put everything that you do...
I don't know why this stop working when I upgrade too.
Robert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm doing an upgrade to the latest samba 3.0.28, and something's bugging me:
> on the old server I had this working
Hi,
I'm doing an upgrade to the latest samba 3.0.28, and something's bugging me: on
the old server I had this working OK:
root preexec = /usr/local/bin/ntlogon.py --user=%U --os=%m
--dir=/home/samba/netlogon/ && /usr/local/bin/pdc-log.sh %U %m %a %d
On 3.0.28, I can only get the first script t
Hi,
I read the whole chapter and found the magic words :-)
---
To obtain the domain SID on a Samba domain controller, run the following
command:
|root# | net getlocalsid
SID for domain FOO is: S-1-5-21-4294955119-3368514841-2087710299
You may assign the domain administrator RID to an account
a@lists.samba.org
>Onderwerp: [Samba] root != admin domain user?
>
>Hi all,
>
>Samba has been running as PDC for some months in a row w/o no
>issues so
>far.
>Users and machines were created and added to the domain correctly...
>
>Now I'm facing the following probl
See on the samba howto collection the chapter 15 "User rights and
Privileges" .
You will find the answer.
---
Stéphane PURNELLE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Service Informatique Corman S.A. Tel : 00 32 087/342467
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a é
Hi all,
Samba has been running as PDC for some months in a row w/o no issues so
far.
Users and machines were created and added to the domain correctly...
Now I'm facing the following problem... I hope it's easy to solve...
Although machines have been added to the domain using the root user, an
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/root-tf3883774.html#a11007657
Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Samba 3.0.23a
Solaris 9
I have reecently upgraded my Samba server to the above version and joined an
Active Directory domain. Since having achieved this I have been encountering
a strange problem.
On some of my printers the printing of banner pages is enabled. In some
instances when a user sub
hi,
I have installed the samba 3 release. but i don't update my ldap server.
to use previous ldap release using the old samba shema we can put
ldapsam_compat under smb.conf.
all seem to work fine but my samba root couldn't connect from windows
and so can't integrate windows wro
I'm wondering if anyone has tried use local Solaris NSS files for
root-only login VIA the console or ssh - effectively bypassing
domain security to the PDC using ADS - Windows 2003 AD?
I am not having a problem logging as the non-admin user.
I wish to login to the root account that would not be pa
I used the idelax smbldap-passwd script to update the password is that ok ??
because that did't work, because the original password still didn't work,
- Original Message -
From: "John H Terpstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 1:09 PM
On Sunday 24 April 2005 23:11, Adi Nugraha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since nobody answered my previous post I'm hoping to get an answer for this
> one, I have a working samba PDC with LDAP backend, recently i tried to add
> a W2k Workstation to the domain using root account and it returned with a
> wrong pa
Hi,
since nobody answered my previous post I'm hoping to get an answer for this
one, I have a working samba PDC with LDAP backend, recently i tried to add a
W2k Workstation to the domain using root account and it returned with a
wrong password, but i am able to login using the same account to the
I'm pretty sure i added root to samba database, but i tried it again in
other machine , first thing i did was smbpasswd -a root , but still get
the same strange error:
"The system cannot log you on due to the following error :
A device attached to the system is not functioning."
This is the error
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 18:38, Paul Gienger wrote:
> >>I'm pretty sure i added root to samba database, but i tried it again in
> >>other machine , first thing i did was smbpasswd -a root , but still get
> >>the same strange error:
> >>"The system cannot log you on due to the following error :
> >> A
I'm pretty sure i added root to samba database, but i tried it again in
other machine , first thing i did was smbpasswd -a root , but still get
the same strange error:
"The system cannot log you on due to the following error :
A device attached to the system is not functioning."
This is the e
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 17:58, Bruno Quintas wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 09:12, Robin Rosenberg wrote:
>
> > tisdag 15 mars 2005 01:10 skrev Bruno Quintas:
> > > Hi all, having this problem... after joining a machine to domain, users
> > > login ok, but not root.
> > >
> > > Any first toughts?
>
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 09:12, Robin Rosenberg wrote:
> tisdag 15 mars 2005 01:10 skrev Bruno Quintas:
> > Hi all, having this problem... after joining a machine to domain, users
> > login ok, but not root.
> >
> > Any first toughts?
>
> Yes. root isn't in samba's user database, not a sambaSamAccou
tisdag 15 mars 2005 01:10 skrev Bruno Quintas:
> Hi all, having this problem... after joining a machine to domain, users
> login ok, but not root.
>
> Any first toughts?
Yes. root isn't in samba's user database, not a sambaSamAccount (ldap backend)
or no smbpassword set.
-- robin
--
To unsubscri
Hi all, having this problem... after joining a machine to domain, users
login ok, but not root.
Any first toughts?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
/etc/samba/smb.conf::
[root]
path = /
writeable = yes
valid users = root
(one slip of the mouse and you've go problems!!!)
Be careful, but here is your solution
[config]
comment = Admin Config Share - Whatever
path = /
valid users = george,wendy,@somegroup
force use
I'm attempting to provide root access to the entire file system over the
network. Having much trouble getting it working. My first time attempting
samba configuration. Anyone have any ideas?
/etc/samba/smbusers:
root = root
/etc/samba/smbpasswd:
root:0:..
/etc/samba/smb.conf::
[root]
p
On Monday 07 February 2005 16:33, David Trask wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, February 7, 2005 at 5:53 PM + wrote:
> >> > smbldap-populate -a root
> >> >
> >> > instead of just plain
> >> >
> >> > smbldap-populate
>
> John,
>
> Actually it was your advice from a much earlier post that I w
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 18:43 -0500, David Trask wrote:
> Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Monday, February 7, 2005 at 6:27
> PM + wrote:
> >1 - if you have root user in both /etc/passwd and DSA, you get errors in
> >ldap logs. You seem to have seized upon a configuration that is
> >knowingly i
Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Monday, February 7, 2005 at 6:27
PM + wrote:
>1 - if you have root user in both /etc/passwd and DSA, you get errors in
>ldap logs. You seem to have seized upon a configuration that is
>knowingly imperfect but expedient for samba use. What happens if you
>chang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig White wrote:
| 1 - if you have root user in both /etc/passwd and DSA,
| you get errors in ldap logs. You seem to have seized upon
| a configuration that is knowingly imperfect but expedient
| for samba use. What happens if you change root's passwo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Monday, February 7, 2005 at 5:53 PM + wrote:
>> > smbldap-populate -a root
>> >
>> > instead of just plain
>> >
>> > smbldap-populate
John,
Actually it was your advice from a much earlier post that I was
usingthanks! :-) (It cleared up a lot of little quirky behavio
Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Monday, February 7, 2005 at 5:42
PM + wrote:
>you're the one in control and can write whatever value you want to LDAP.
good pointjust after I posted my request I figured it out :-)
>
>
>probably best to do it outside of your mass populate script
Amen
>
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 15:53 -0700, John H Terpstra wrote:
> On Monday 07 February 2005 15:42, Craig White wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 17:20 -0500, David Trask wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I finally have my profiles problem squared away
> > >
> > > I've done away with the Administrator user
On Monday 07 February 2005 15:42, Craig White wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 17:20 -0500, David Trask wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I finally have my profiles problem squared away
> >
> > I've done away with the Administrator user in smbldap-tools by running
> >
> > smbldap-populate -a root
> >
> > in
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 17:20 -0500, David Trask wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I finally have my profiles problem squared away
>
> I've done away with the Administrator user in smbldap-tools by running
>
> smbldap-populate -a root
>
> instead of just plain
>
> smbldap-populate
>
> Thus root is now the
On Monday 07 February 2005 15:20, David Trask wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I finally have my profiles problem squared away
>
> I've done away with the Administrator user in smbldap-tools by running
>
> smbldap-populate -a root
>
> instead of just plain
>
> smbldap-populate
>
> Thus root is now the samba ad
Hi,
I finally have my profiles problem squared away
I've done away with the Administrator user in smbldap-tools by running
smbldap-populate -a root
instead of just plain
smbldap-populate
Thus root is now the samba admin. BUTwhen I run getent passwd my
system shows the home director
On Thursday 02 December 2004 19:10, Justin Zachor wrote:
> Okay, I'm making progress... here's a better directed question:
>
> The problem is that when a profile is created on the Samba server
> (pushed up from the Win2K client by "Copy To..." dialog, run as Local
> Admin) some of the profile files
Okay, I'm making progress... here's a better directed question:
The problem is that when a profile is created on the Samba server
(pushed up from the Win2K client by "Copy To..." dialog, run as Local
Admin) some of the profile files are owned by root and not readable by
group or other. This task
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Zachor wrote:
| Here's another question related to how to use masks --
|
| In my PDC area I specify:
|
| logon path = \\netapp\profiles\%u
I recommend %U and not %u for the 'logon path' in most cases
| This puts server-based (roaming) profile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Zachor wrote:
| On a newly migrated profile (migrated onto Samba server, from local)
| some files/dirs get root ownership.
|
| [global]
|
| # -- BEGIN PDC --
| domain logons = yes
| logon path = \\netapp\profiles\%u
| logon drive
Here's another question related to how to use masks --
In my PDC area I specify:
logon path = \\netapp\profiles\%u
This puts server-based (roaming) profiles on my Network Appliance (which
itself is an SMB/PDC client).
A previous admin here left this commented section:
#[profiles]
# path
On a newly migrated profile (migrated onto Samba server, from local)
some files/dirs get root ownership.
How can I stop this from happening, without having to manually adjust
the permissions? Should I use "force create mode = 0600" or "force
directory mode = 0700"? If so, then where?
For example
d
On a newly migrated profile (migrated onto Samba server, from local)
some files/dirs get root ownership.
How can I stop this from happening, without having to manually adjust
the permissions? Should I use "force create mode = 0600" or "force
directory mode = 0700"? If so, then where?
For example
d
On a newly migrated profile (migrated onto Samba server, from local)
some files/dirs get root ownership.
How can I stop this from happening, without having to manually adjust
the permissions? Should I use "force create mode = 0600" or "force
directory mode = 0700"? If so, then where?
For exam
Hi.
I'm tesing Samba 3.0.7-a on Debian Sarge with Debian kernel 2.6.8.
I am working on auto-creation of logon scripts, & am using a root preexec
on the netlogon share for this.
In testing I have passed the user ID to the script, and have used echo to
test output. The netlogon service paramete
After installing samba-server-3.0.2a-3mdk
on Mandrake 10.0 I cannot logon to a disk share as root anymore.
I have added root as a user using SWAT.
Whenever I click on a disk share from a client machine like Windows 2000 I
get a logon prompt.
When I enter the credentials fo root logon fails.
Other u
I've just installed the samba-2.2.7-Tru64-OSF5.1 kit on
my alpha system and cant login to swat as root.
Login as a normal user is OK, and root-login can be achieved if
I use 'swat -a' in the inetd.conf entry.
I saw others reporting this problem in the archives, but
couldnt find a solution posted
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 05:02, Moe Hans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed samba on a SCO system . All the demons comes up
> properly without any error. But wen we try to mount any thing I saw
> following messages
>
> ERROR: root did not create the semaphore
> [2004/02/23 09:59:10, 0] locking/loc
Hi,
I installed samba on a SCO system . All the demons comes up
properly without any error. But wen we try to mount any thing I saw
following messages
ERROR: root did not create the semaphore
[2004/02/23 09:59:10, 0] locking/locking.c:locking_init(174)
ERROR: Failed to initialise share
When trying to connect to a samba PDC I receive this error of wrong network
password.
I've checked samba root's password, machine account, user account and so but
nothing seems to
work. the other day I go into the domain without a problem, now I cannot do
that ( I've change
quite a lot parameters i
I tried this and it did not work. I verified that the /etc/passwd and
/products/samba/private/smbpasswd files contained the right user accounts
(the latter having a W). I am in the domain admin group= portion of the
smb.conf. However, it tells me on the windows end that my password is bad
-- it is
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, David van Geyn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have now successfully got Samba 3.0.0 authenticating my users and the
> old machine trust accounts are working fine. Two more questions for you
> though! :-)
>
> 1) How do I make a user other than root have the ability to modify
> parameters i
Hi,
I have now successfully got Samba 3.0.0 authenticating my users and the
old machine trust accounts are working fine. Two more questions for you
though! :-)
1) How do I make a user other than root have the ability to modify
parameters in Windows NT User Manager for Domains - If I log in to the
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, David van Geyn wrote:
> Here's what I tested...
>
> rm -rf /usr/local/samba3 to delete the new samba installation
> cd /tmp/samba-3.0.0beta1
> make install
> cp /tmp/smb.conf /usr/local/samba3/lib
> cd /usr/local/samba3/bin
> ./smbpasswd -a root
> New SMB password:
> Retype ne
Here's what I tested...
rm -rf /usr/local/samba3 to delete the new samba installation
cd /tmp/samba-3.0.0beta1
make install
cp /tmp/smb.conf /usr/local/samba3/lib
cd /usr/local/samba3/bin
./smbpasswd -a root
New SMB password:
Retype new SMB password:
pdb_getsampwnam: Unable to open TDB passwd
(/us
Attached is smb.conf - I tried also setting passdb backend = tdbsam,
guest, but it won't let me add the root user to the pass database.
eg, using smbpasswd
radium# ./smbpasswd -a root
New SMB password:
Retype new SMB password:
tdb_update_sam: Failing to store a SAM_ACCOUNT for [root] without a
pr
David,
Please email me your smb.conf file, I'll take a look.
- John T.
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, David van Geyn wrote:
> Hello
>
> Anytime I try to do anything with the root user (like join the domain) or
> run 'net user' or 'net group' with root, when I enter the correct
> password, I get NT_STATUS
Hello
Anytime I try to do anything with the root user (like join the domain) or
run 'net user' or 'net group' with root, when I enter the correct
password, I get NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
I've been trying more commands, and if I run tdbedit -e=tdbsam (to export
the smbpasswd to tdbsam style), I
check the rights of your spooler directory of samba (path =)
Tim Thaler schrieb:
Hi,
I have a Win2k client that should be able to print to a printer
connected to a SuSE 8.1 Linux box.
The situation:
- 'root' is able to print from Win2k to the Linux, user 'tim' is not.
- Both, 'root' and 'tim'
Hi,
I have a Win2k client that should be able to print to a printer
connected to a SuSE 8.1 Linux box.
The situation:
- 'root' is able to print from Win2k to the Linux, user 'tim' is not.
- Both, 'root' and 'tim' have their home directories visible and
accessible on the Win2k.
- User acounts o
Walter Mautner wrote:
>
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > John Benedetto wrote:
> > >
> > > --On Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:46 PM +0100 Walter Mautner
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > >> [netlogon]
> > > >>comment = Network Logon Service
> > > >>path = /home/netlogon
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> John Benedetto wrote:
> >
> > --On Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:46 PM +0100 Walter Mautner
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> > >> [netlogon]
> > >>comment = Network Logon Service
> > >>path = /home/netlogon
> > >>guest ok = yes
> > >>read only = y
John Benedetto wrote:
>
> --On Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:46 PM +0100 Walter Mautner
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> [netlogon]
> >>comment = Network Logon Service
> >>path = /home/netlogon
> >>guest ok = yes
> >>read only = yes
> >>browseable = no
> >>printable =
--On Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:46 PM +0100 Walter Mautner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Last night at home, and on a second system today at work, I
tried putting in the sample preexec statement contained in
the smb.conf man page to check it's effect on the domain
logons. Just like the preexec
> Last night at home, and on a second system today at work, I
> tried putting in the sample preexec statement contained in
> the smb.conf man page to check it's effect on the domain
> logons. Just like the preexec for the perl script it kills
> domain logons. As that script is right in the smb.conf
Last night at home, and on a second system today at work, I tried
putting in the sample preexec statement contained in the smb.conf man
page to check it's effect on the domain logons. Just like the preexec
for the perl script it kills domain logons. As that script is right in
the smb.conf man page
Deryk Robosson wrote:
>
> > set the log level to 3 (I saw that in man smb.conf but it didn't
> > indicate whether it could go any higher) but didn't see anything in
>
> Try 5. I don't recall right off the top of my head how high it goes but I do
> remember 5 spitting out a wealth of info.
Ok. I
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:48 am, you wrote:
> Hi Deryk, thanks for the personal response.
>
> I forgot to mention in the original post that part of my reason for
> upgrading to 2.2.6 was to get away from the redhat rpms in the hope that
> I could get the log level boosted up some. That part was succes
Hi Deryk, thanks for the personal response.
I forgot to mention in the original post that part of my reason for
upgrading to 2.2.6 was to get away from the redhat rpms in the hope that
I could get the log level boosted up some. That part was successful. I
set the log level to 3 (I saw that in man
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:44 pm, Mike Rambo wrote:
[SNIP]
> scripts run fine on the workstations at login. I'm using a netlogon
> script I found at http://www.0x0a.com/netlogon.php that I've modified to
> handle multiple groups based upon group membership in /etc/group as I
> need. If I run the script
I have a perl script that I'd like to use to create windows 9x login
scripts at login time but I cannot get the process to work right. I have
RedHat 7.3 (actually the k12ltsp v2.1.0 which is a modified RH7.3) set
up as a domain controller which is working well. Manually created login
scripts run fi
92 matches
Mail list logo
