Hi
Yes, we are migrating to a new machine.
Regards
Anna
-Original Message-
From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 June, 2010 9:20 PM
To: Anna Thng; samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba-3.0.4
> Can this version runs on AIX 6 ? If we have some scripts done
> Can this version runs on AIX 6 ? If we have some scripts done on 3.0.4, can
> these run without changes on latest samba version ?
>
Are you sure you mean 3.0.4? That was released in May of 2004.
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://
Hi
Can this version runs on AIX 6 ? If we have some scripts done on 3.0.4, can
these run without changes on latest samba version ?
Regards
Anna
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
K.Watanabe wrote:
Hi.
I am using same SuSE9.1 and Samba3.0.4.(updated automatically by YaST)
smbpasswd is still existing and samba is fine.
How about re-install RPMs with YaST?
Kei([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Yes. I have found it now. They have removed it from samba.rpm and
packaged it to samba-client.rpm
Hi.
I am using same SuSE9.1 and Samba3.0.4.(updated automatically by YaST)
smbpasswd is still existing and samba is fine.
How about re-install RPMs with YaST?
Kei([EMAIL PROTECTED])
smbpasswd utility is missing in newest SuSE samba-3.0.4 patch for
SuSE-9.1 distro (via online update) so I've just t
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Izo wrote:
|
| Does this mean that the Samba is not reliable anymore ?
| The smbpasswd is only part of my question. Of course
| I could install it from the previous RPM, yet it would not
| solve my problem at all.
I have n
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 07:19 -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> |>Doing spnego session setup (blob length=58)
> |>got OID=1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10
> |>got principal=NONE
> |>Got challenge flags:
> |>Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Izo wrote:
|
| Does this mean that the Samba is not reliable anymore ?
| The smbpasswd is only part of my question. Of course
| I could install it from the previous RPM, yet it would not
| solve my problem at all.
I have no idea what you are talking ab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Folkert wrote:
|>Doing spnego session setup (blob length=58)
|>got OID=1 3 6 1 4 1 311 2 2 10
|>got principal=NONE
|>Got challenge flags:
|>Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0x60890215
|>NTLMSSP: Set final flags:
|>Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0x60080215
|>NTLMSSP Si
My feedback is in-line.
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 08:35 +0100, Izo wrote:
> Not only nobody reads news://linux.samba, nobody obviously reads this
> newsgroup also ! This is just the 5th time I am sending the same or
> similar message in last 7 days with no response...
Remember the term Volunteers? T
Adi Nugraha wrote:
how about redirecting the smbpasswd file to the older version (assuming you
have one) using smbpasswd file = /file/path/smbpasswd , I replaced my copy
of smbpasswd for 3.09 with a 2.216 and the smbpasswd command stopped
working, (no new entry added to the smbpasswd file), but wh
how about redirecting the smbpasswd file to the older version (assuming you
have one) using smbpasswd file = /file/path/smbpasswd , I replaced my copy
of smbpasswd for 3.09 with a 2.216 and the smbpasswd command stopped
working, (no new entry added to the smbpasswd file), but when i used that it
wo
Not only nobody reads news://linux.samba, nobody obviously reads this
newsgroup also ! This is just the 5th time I am sending the same or
similar message in last 7 days with no response...
I would like to point out that *I really need" help on this - either
appointment to prompter resource eith
I just hope that this time I get heard since obviously nobody reads
news://linux.samba ...
Platform: SuSE-9.1, kernel-2.6.5, samba-3.0.4
I have recently upgraded from 3.0.2a to 3.0.4 and I have just noticed
that using the same smb.conf as with previous version, the system just
does not work anym
Hello, I am having a problem with Samba 3.0.4 and DOS clients. The
MSDOS COPY command will not work on mapped directories. When I try to
run the COPY command I get an "File not found" error message. This only
happens on DOS, all other OS's work fine.
I have noticed that someone else on this lis
Hi,
I have a problem with Samba 3.0.4 and DOS 6.2.2.
Our clientinstallation works with PXE. This setup connects the samba-server
with a DOS 6.2.2 batch-script, which attempts to copy a text-file from the
client to the installation-share.
I have interrupted the script and attempted to do the copy m
When attempting to login to my Samba 3.0.4 PDC from a Windows XP client as a
user with administrative priveleges (in this case, the user is a member of
the adm group in Linux and all members of that group are members of the
Adminstrators group in Windows) I get the following error:
Windows did
I am using samba 3.0.4 on a SUSE 9 using smbpasswd as backend db, very
simple installation to get the hang of samba. I am able to join the
domain with root samba user, I created using swat, when I log in as that
user, in the home directory there are 2 other directories, bin and
desktop, I now that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philip Chambers wrote:
| I am trying to get samba 3.0.4 to work as a PDC
| using LDAP with my old samba 2 schema. I used -with-ldapsam
| when building in the hope that that would be OK.
|
| I had a problem when it came to "net groupmap ..."
| because
I am trying to get samba 3.0.4 to work as a PDC using LDAP with my old samba 2
schema. I used -with-ldapsam when building in the hope that that would be OK.
I had a problem when it came to "net groupmap ..." because samba was trying to use
the samba 3 schema attribute sambaSID. I got round thi
Hi, I have Samba 3.0.4 running with openldap 2.2.15. I have a PDC and two
member servers. I want to load balance my users home directories and
roaming profiles over the two member servers. At the moment everything is
on the PDC and is running fine! I just set sambaHomePath and that
sambaProfil
I have 3.0.4 successfully running against OpenLDAP 2.2.13.
I noticed that during a password change the replog for "samba" password
stuff is "delete/add" pairs while the "userPassword" is a "replace". I can
only assume that Samba is generating the "delete/add" pairs, while the api
call to ldap_ex
Hi,
My XP client cant access the samba share: any help would be great
My environment:
RH ES 3.1 + "up2date"
Samba 3.0.4-6.3E
Kerberos 1.2.7
I have followed the "samba3 by example book" & the "Samba3 How To
Guide"
It joined to ad & I can View Kerberos tickets and do
Hi Martin
I didn't find an official solution yet, but I did find a workaround that
is working well enough for my simple setup as of now:)
I just gave my samba host a different netbios name ( totally unrelated
to its dns name). When I want to access the share, I use the dns name,
so I guess it
I tried to install samba 3.0.4 and does not work.
(BEvery time I did 'PKILL -HUP inetd'' it does not start the samba daemon.
(B
(BI have the three lines on the bottom of the inetd.conf:
(B
(Bnetbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root/usr/local/sbin/tcpd
(B/usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd
I learned the new samba configurations for samba-3.0.2-6.3E on a RedHat
Enterprise 3 system.I could successfully create a domain master or
a samba server to work as a connection to a domain master on another
subnet.
I then upgraded another system to Redhat Enterprise 3, copied over the
smb
I learned the new samba configurations for samba-3.0.2-6.3E on a RedHat
Enterprise 3 system.I could successfully create a domain master or
a samba server to work as a connection to a domain master on another
subnet.
I then upgraded another system to Redhat Enterprise 3, copied over the
smb
Hi,
I am using Samba 3.0.4 on a server in a Windows NT Domain. I am reading
about the "net" commands. I'm trying to better understand the purpose of net
groupmaps.
I have joined the Samba server to the NT domain. I can use wbinfo and getent
to view users and groups from the domain. However, what
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 11:34:22AM +0200, Sterck Serge wrote:
> Since release of samba 3.0.4 I can mounted a smb share from a os/2 warp
> server
> after tracing and comparing version 3.0.3 against 3.0.4 there is a problem
> when sending
> the username to the OS/2 PDC so you always received access d
Since release of samba 3.0.4 I can mounted a smb share from a os/2 warp
server
after tracing and comparing version 3.0.3 against 3.0.4 there is a problem
when sending
the username to the OS/2 PDC so you always received access deny because the
user
that is sended by samba is mess with the group is t
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 04:11:57PM -0400, Mike Box wrote:
> Thanks to Jim C. for his suggestion of winbind, which I will also pursue.
>
> However, this specific problem was corrected by moving the "private" directory
> from NFS to a local filesystem.
>
> I recall experiencing this situation befo
Thanks to Jim C. for his suggestion of winbind, which I will also pursue.
However, this specific problem was corrected by moving the "private" directory
from NFS to a local filesystem.
I recall experiencing this situation before. Okay, Solaris gurus, what exactly
causes this problem? Is it un
I am trying to install Samba version 3.0.4 to work with SSL on an IBM server
7029 running AIX version 5.1 maint level4.
The C compiler installed on the server is vac.C version 6.0.0.0
The steps i have taken so far are
from the source directory i have run ./configure--with-ssl which completed
Howdy. I have observed a horrific performance problem in my setup.
I'm running samba on a Linux Fedora Core 1 machine with Windows
clients. The samba server is communicating with a Windows 98 machine.
$ /usr/sbin/smbd -V
Version 3.0.4-1.FC1
The configuration of my server is mostly default with
Hi,
Michael Lueck
I'm answering my 'own' question just be recorded
at mail list archives, so it remains in the public
domain. :)
:: Felipe van de Wiel wrote:
:: The problem:
:: The authentication system! I don't know if
:: I'm missing something, but I can't put the packaged
:: samba
Hi people
My problem is quite strange, and I am just sending this email to point
out another small oddity I noticed while setting acls. My server is
Samba 3.0.4, and I have acl support built into it as well as into the
2.4.24 kernel (patched with acl patch from acl.bestbits.at).
Here is the str
Hi Stefan,
once i used the sernet packs ( failure with my cups pdfwriter which
worked before ), and had a few failures with suse 9,
i recommend you to use the samba packs from
ftp.suse.com projects samba ,this should solve your problem
Regards Robert
Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb:
Hello,
at a clie
Hello,
at a client's site I have to use Suse Linux 9.0 Pro for specific
kernel-modules Suse Linux 9.1 does not provide anymore.
To get the server up-to-date I took the Samba-rpms from sernet.de and
ran a successful "rpm -Uvh".
For an application it is necessary to print via the smb-backend of
C
Thanks Jerry
I had checked most of the time using the netbios name of the samba host.
I am using samba 3.0.4, and I do recall that I had been able to get
the acls working for around a day even using the netbios names when I
had been playing around with some settings. However, the acl display
Searching the archives for a solution to this problem revealed no solution.
Recently I built Samba-3.0.4 from downloaded source on a computer running
Solaris 8. I wish to have this computer join a Windows NT 4.0 domain (as
only a member.) I have another computer currently running Samba-2.0.7 as
Hi all,
So the scenario:
Pentium 133MHz (x86), 32MB RAM, HD 4.7GB
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r0, XFS released by Blade
All upgrades (apt-get dist-upgrade) applied.
Samba PDC (LDAP), running as domain master,
prefered master, domain logons. Using Samba3-beta2,
it is a production server 24/7,
Hello,
I had the same problem as you and it took me a while to figure it out
exactly.
Ive now a RHL9 server running with Samba 3.0.4 as a domain member of a W2k3
realm.
Actually I updated Kerberos to version 1.3.1-7 on my RHL9 server to achieve
this; otherwise samba cant verify the incoming ticke
Did you have installed samba + ldap?
It isn't strange; 'cos samba maps groups and users from Windows to Unix.
when yuo map group ÂDomain Admins -> Âroot or Administrators ->
ÂrootÂ, it will map to uid = 0 and gid = 0; because user is unix
administrator himself!
You should try samba + ldap and
Ok it works !!
Thanks a lot !
Permissions are set correctly but i steel have a strange thing ..
User which are "Domains admins" like root, when they create a new file,
it's own by root.
--
Christophe Suire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Le 13 juil. 04, à 14:56, Umberto Zanatta a écrit
The file server is the same as the PDC : linux / samba 3.0.4
So why i need to use winbind ?
I need to use roming profile so i need to have profile acls = yes ? no ?
Thanks a lot.
--
Christophe Suire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Le 13 juil. 04, à 14:39, Umberto Zanatta a écrit :
You sh
You should set profile acls = no from smb.conf
Here you are a tipical share:
[FOO]
profile acls = no
path = /opt/foo
write list = @, @bbb, @Administrators
create mask = 660
directory mask = 770
comment = Foo share
valid users = @aaa, @bb
Hi again,
I have just see, that the problem is not link with the modification of
the file. In fact this problem appear when Windows change ACL
attribute, and i have found an other strange thing :
A user "jokic" create a new text file. On the server i have :
-rwxrwx---+ 1 root informatique
Hi,
I have done a migration from Samba 2 to 3.0.4; and i have a very big
problem with ACL.
I have a file own by a user "drif" and group "informatique" with ACL
attributes and unix attributes rwxrwx--- :
-rwxrwx---+ 1 drif informatique68096 2004-07-13 11:01 fiche
de migration.xls
When
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry forgot to add '--prefix=/usr/local/kerberos' or whatever dir you want to install
krb5 into..
MB
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:47:12 -0700
Michael Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I have had this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have had this problem also on RHEL3 AS. I installed kerberos 1.3.4 from source
into /usr/local/kerberos (remember to configure for dns & shared libraries...
i.e. ./configure --enable-dns --disable-krb4 --enable-shared,etc). Call on these
libs when
First off, spamming the list probably won't get you any help any
quicker, or in this particular case, any more detailed.
Try perhaps downloading the source rpm from Fedora Core 1 and rebuild
it. Then upgrade the rpm in place.
Andrey wrote:
Hi All,
I've been using samba 2.2.8a running on RedH
Hi All,
I've been using samba 2.2.8a running on RedHat 9 as a PDC for almost a year by
now. Everything works great
even though it required some time to configure everything properly.
Our company decided to move to Active Directory running on Win2003 server
I want to leave Samba as our fi
Hi All,
I've been using samba 2.2.8a running on RedHat 9 as a PDC for almost a year by
now. Everything works great
even though it required some time to configure everything properly.
Our company decided to move to Active Directory running on Win2003 server
I want to leave Samba as our fi
Hi All,
I've been using samba 2.2.8a running on RedHat 9 as a PDC for almost a year by
now. Everything works great
even though it required some time to configure everything properly.
Our company decided to move to Active Directory running on Win2003 server
I want to leave Samba as our fi
Hi All,
I've been using samba 2.2.8a running on RedHat 9 as a PDC for almost a year by
now. Everything works great
even though it required some time to configure everything properly.
Our company decided to move to Active Directory running on Win2003 server
I want to leave Samba as our fi
Samba 3.0.4 and kerberos
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
t: Montag, 12. Juli 2004 12:15
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: RE: [Samba] Samba 3.0.4 + ldap + heartbeat cluster
>
>
> Yes, cfg on both nodes are same. But samba on secondary node runs
> only when
> primary fail.
> So i thing is not necessary (my opinion)
So thank fo now.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Arno Seidel
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 11:01 AM
To: Pavel Hrozek; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: [Samba] Samba 3.0.4 + ldap + heartbeat cluster
hi Pavel,
did you check the log files
PROTECTED] Auftrag von
> Pavel Hrozek
> Gesendet: Montag, 12. Juli 2004 10:47
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: [Samba] Samba 3.0.4 + ldap + heartbeat cluster
>
>
> Hi,
> I have samba 3.0.4 with openldap and heartbeat. Everthing on Fedora Core 1
> Everything seems work
Hi,
I have samba 3.0.4 with openldap and heartbeat. Everthing on Fedora Core 1
Everything seems work fine, but after couple minutes work shares not
available
Message "path not found" sometimes even appear message "domain not
available"
But ping on ipadress and name of PDC work fine.
So, everything
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Prajjwal wrote:
| I can view and modify any permissions on the existing
| files that are being shared. If setfacl has been used
| to grant additional users permissions, then those users
| are also displayed, and their permissions can also be set.
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There is a 'makerpms.sh' script in the packaging/RedHat directory of the tarball.
I have successfully built and installed 3.0.4 on RHAS 3 using rpms made from this
script.
Hope this helps.
Michael Brown
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:51:11 +0100
"Simon Oliv
I'm having the same problem. Did you ever find a answer.
Thanks
Mark Sanchez
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Specs: RedHat 9
Samba V: 3.0.4
Clients: W2K and WinXP Pro
smb.conf file:
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = aharinc.com
netbios name = CHIMERA
server string = Chimera- Test PDC
encrypt passwords = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passw
> On a more practical level, you could probably grab the RHEL
> SRPM, update the version number and tarball, and rebuild.
I like the sound of this - if any new patches become available I can then
just rebuild the package myself. However, I have no experience of the
process you describe above.
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 20:08, Simon Oliver wrote:
> There have been several issues fixes since the 3.0.2 release of Samba. One
> of the most important issues is a problem with password changing after
> applying the patch described in the Microsoft KB828741 article to Windows
> clients.
>
> I want
Hi,
> I want to run Samba 3.0.4 on RHEL3. The version provided by RedHat is
> samba-3.0.2-6.3E. I can't find any other RPMs or SRPMs for RHEL3. Any help
> you can provide would be much appreciated.
a) Complain to RedHat. It is their job to produce packages for their
distribution. Though, from
There have been several issues fixes since the 3.0.2 release of Samba. One
of the most important issues is a problem with password changing after
applying the patch described in the Microsoft KB828741 article to Windows
clients.
I want to run Samba 3.0.4 on RHEL3. The version provided by RedHat
I want to run Samba 3.0.4 on RHEL3. The version provided by RedHat is
samba-3.0.2-6.3E. I can't find any RPMs or SRPMs for RHEL3. Any help you
can provide would be much appreciated.
Regards
--
Simon Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instru
uot;HM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 5:46 PM
Subject: [Samba] samba 3.0.4 : impossible to log in the domain after a few
minutes
I'm back (twice ^^).
After solving my problem about joining the domain, i now meet another
strange (
Hi all
I have a samba 3.0.4 pdc compiled with acl support built in, and the
following options configured at compile time:
./configure --with-acl-support --with-smbclient --with-sm
bmount --with-quota --with-ads --with-tdbsam
I am just trying to provide acl support to my users, and I know that
a
- Original Message -
From: "HM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 5:46 PM
Subject: [Samba] samba 3.0.4 : impossible to log in the domain after a few
minutes
> I'm back (twice ^^).
>
> After solving my problem
ot;HM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba 3.0.4 : cannot join domain with w2k clients.
> I'm back ;-)
>
> Thanks a lot to all of you who take some time to help me. I finally
> solved the pro
I'm back (twice ^^).
After solving my problem about joining the domain, i now meet another
strange (very strange !) issue : after joining the domain, my w2k client
reboots, and i log in using any of the accounts on the server. But after
10/15 minutes, it refuses logins !!
If i reboot the client,
I'm back ;-)
Thanks a lot to all of you who take some time to help me. I finally
solved the problem : the add machine script option in smb.conf seems to
produce invalid machine accounts (?!).
workaround : disable this option in the smb.conf file and manually
create both system account AND smbpa
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, HM wrote:
Hello all.
I'm trying since a few jours to get my w2k clients join my domain, managed by
my samba 3.0.4 PDC, without success. I can browse the server, share files
with it with my station, but i can't join the domain. When i try to, i get
the following message (sorr
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, HM wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I'm trying since a few jours to get my w2k clients join my domain,
> managed by my samba 3.0.4 PDC, without success. I can browse the server,
> share files with it with my station, but i can't join the domain. When i
> try to, i get the following
Hi,
I compared your smb.conf with mine.
I am running Samba 3 PDC with W2K clients very well.
My Samba version is 3.0.2a-1 (using Debian Sarge distribution)
After try to join domain, are there created new user and/or machine accounts
in /etc/smbpasswd?
Do you already have appropriate user account
Sorry : i forgot my smb.conf :
Here it is :
[global]
netbios name = serveur
workgroup = sls
passdb backend = smbpasswd:/etc/samba/private/smbpasswd
os level = 255
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
security = user
preferre
Hello all.
I'm trying since a few jours to get my w2k clients join my domain,
managed by my samba 3.0.4 PDC, without success. I can browse the server,
share files with it with my station, but i can't join the domain. When i
try to, i get the following message (sorry for the poor translation) :
Hi list
I have a strange problem with my Samba 3.04 server running on redhat 9
with 2.4.24 kernel (with acl patch from acl.bestbits.at applied to it).
Acls are working fine on my system, and my server is working fine as a
Samba PDC (or so it seems).
I can view and modify any permissions on the
I'm trying to build the --with-fake-kaserver option in 3.0.4 on RHEL
3.0.
I'm using the srpms provided on the samba.org site
(http://us3.samba.org/samba/ftp/bin-pkgs/RedHat/SRPMS/samba-3.0.4
-1.src.rpm).
My OpenAFS version is 1.2.11, rpms (openafs-1.2.11 and
openafs-devel-1.2.11) provided
Sergey V. schrieb:
Hi!
We migrated from Linux (kernel 2.4.24) to FreeBSD 5.2.1
(the same smb.conf, with Linux all was fine :( )
Encounted some problems with file locking with shared files
(especially with .xls & .doc files)
some client can be announced about locking, some - not
all clients
Hi!
We migrated from Linux (kernel 2.4.24) to FreeBSD 5.2.1
(the same smb.conf, with Linux all was fine :( )
Encounted some problems with file locking with shared files
(especially with .xls & .doc files)
some client can be announced about locking, some - not
all clients - w2k, office 200
Hi!
I've wrote to you on previous occasion but surprisingly nobody seems to have
this
problem, I don't know if it can be an error mine in the configuration files
or if it's a problem in the Samba with cracklib, well I've installed samba
3.0.4
and put in the file /etc/pam.d/samba an entry to the
Would this setup make samba really slow?
P4 2.8, 512mb, dual 120gb HD's with software raid(mirrored).
Thanks for your help
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Its not an acl problem, because I can ldapsearch to both the master and
the slave(local ldap server) from the BDC. The logs I'm looking at is
/var/log/debug and the log.smbd. Thanks for your help!
Jason
Beast wrote:
Jason C. Waters wrote:
This is my setup, is something still wrong.
Samba PDC m
Jason C. Waters wrote:
This is my setup, is something still wrong.
Samba PDC machine with LDAP
IP: ldap.master
nss mapped to local ldap server(ldap.master)
samba ldapsam:"ldaps://ldap.server"
Samba BDC machine with LDAP, has openldap running locally for a backup
ldap server
IP: ldap.s
This is my setup, is something still wrong.
Samba PDC machine with LDAP
IP: ldap.master
nss mapped to local ldap server(ldap.master)
samba ldapsam:"ldaps://ldap.server"
Samba BDC machine with LDAP, has openldap running locally for a backup
ldap server
IP: ldap.slave
nss mapped to l
Hi everyone
I've been trying to setup samba file sharing with acl support for the
past few days. I recompiled my kernel with acl support, and have verified
that setfacl and getfacl are working properly.
I compiled samba on my test machine with acl enabled, and was able to
acces
I've got nss_ldap setup to look at the local ldap directory, but when I
have two servers on the passwd backend line, it can't bind. It get to
where it trys to bind, and then it just freezes. Any other ideas? I'm
sure I had this working before. Thanks for your help
Beast wrote:
Jason C. Wate
Jason C. Waters wrote:
passdb backend = ldapsam:"ldaps://ldap.masterserver.com ldaps://ldap.slaveserver.com" - this does not work
This is the correct one. Make sure no other service depends on master
ldap when you're bring down the master (ie nss_ldap).
Also plse check the log.
--
--beast
--
I've configured samba 3.0.4 with LDAP as the backend. I've configured
samba to use the ldap directory, which works fine, my problem is when I
add two two servers into the smb.conf file it sees the first(master)
ldap server, but if I bring that server down it takes forever for it to
switch to t
I recently installed samba 3.0.4 with ldap on fedora core 1 and 2.
Eveything works fine except for when I turn on tls which I need for
secuity. I get tls handshake errors and nothing will work. I had the
same setup with redhat 7.1 samba 2.28 and ldap and tls worked great. I
seem to have tra
Hi,
Has any of you successfully configured Samba 3.0.4 to work with AD? I am
not sure that works at all or I should use version 3.0.0.
Thanks,
Vahid.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Austin, Ben wrote:
| User guest in passdb, but getpwnam() fails!
'guest account' is not set to a valid unix account.
cheers, jerry
- --
Hewlett-Packard--
Hi!
I just downloaded samba-3.0.4 and tried to compile it on AIX 4.3.3
with gcc 2.95.2 using
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-bbigtoc" ./configure --prefix=/bag/samba \
--mandir=/bag/samba/man \
--localstatedir=/usr/local/samba/var \
--with-configdir=/usr/local/samba \
--with-privatedir=/usr/local/samba
I am trying to load Samba 3.0.4 on Motorola PowerMAX
5.1.
Samba is not recognizing the platform when I compile
it. It is bombing out on the config.sub script.
Can you tell me how to get this loaded and what
changes I need to make?
Thanks,
Tom
Hi,
I installed MIT krberos, latest version
BerkeleyDB version 4.2.52
OpenLDAP version 2.1.30
and SAMBA 3.0.4 with the following options:
./configure --with-ldap --with-ads --with-winbind --with-krb5 --with-pam
--with-pam_smbpass
I am trying to authenticate against our win2k AD but I can't seem to
Hello all!
I use samba 3.0.4 with ldap backend.
I've set
guest account = guest
and
map to guest = bad user
But samba still uses nobody as guest account. samba 2.2.8a worked fine.
Is it a bug?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
