Greetings,
What is the difference between two ports on which
samba listens for TCP 139 and 445.
-DJ
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Hi folks,
mentioned this briefly on samba@ about a week ago, but I've actually
done some tracking on it now. I'm still digging, but this is a summary
of what I've found.
symptoms: doing rpcclient SERVER enumdrivers level 3 fetches
information for the Windows 9x drivers, then stalls trying to
Hi Jeremy,
I have a little fix for the id_sid cache, to correct return the sidtype.
metze
-
Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uid.c-02.diff
Description: Binary data
It appears that name_resolve_bcast() does not find hosts in a workgroup if
there are only win98 or win95 machines in the workgroup. The request sent to
192.168.1.255 receives no response. If there is a win2000 machine in the
workgroup (and thus it is the master browser), a proper response is
Sadly, the system on which I labor supports only a 32-byte limit for a
filename. This seemed plenty when we designed the file system in 1980...
I've finally gotten the builds to get to the point where they can run the
test suite, and I have discovered that the (head/3.0) shell script tries to
I got the latest CVS copy of samba 3.0 today. I ran autogen.sh to create
configure. And then I configured the system --with-quotas
--with-acl-support. The configure script bombs when it gets to the part
about test routines. It ends with:
error: cant find test code. Aborting config
I am
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:23:45AM -0800, D Jemms wrote:
snip /
What is the difference between two ports on which
samba listens for TCP 139 and 445.
Ports 137-139 serve SMB over NetBIOS over TCP/IP. This is the transport
used by LANMAN versions before Windows 2000 (Windows 3.x, NT 3.x,
NT
This patch is definitely good. I'd like to see it tested more and also see
it be rewritten to gracefully handle unexpected content. That's probably
premature until we get a little more testing. It might still be a good
idea to check it into HEAD.
Anthony Liguori
Linux/Active Directory
It can't find libiconv.so.2. The test is bad because this should not have
aborted configure. The clues are these lines:
configure:20621: checking for test routines
configure:20637: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 conftest.c -lsec -lgen -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl
I have a WinXP box that has plaintext password enabled. I have a Samba 3.0
CVS server that also does not use encrypted passwords (uses PAM). I cannot
connect to shares from the WinXP box because apparantly the non-encrypted
password is sent as the NT password, and nothing as the LM password.
But what bothers me is that I have that library in /usr/local/lib. Is it
not searching for it there?
Joe
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Green, Paul wrote:
It can't find libiconv.so.2. The test is bad because this should not have
aborted configure. The clues are these lines:
configure:20621:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 11:10:25AM -0500, Joe Meslovich wrote:
But what bothers me is that I have that library in /usr/local/lib. Is it
not searching for it there?
Could you try rerun it with --with-libiconv=/usr/local ?
Also, it will greatly help if you would be able to run the test against
I retried the configure in 3.0 using --with-libiconv=/usr/local, and it
failed in the same way.
I then downloaded the latest version of HEAD and it did the same thing
either way that I ran it.
Joe
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 11:10:25AM -0500, Joe
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:59:58PM -0500, Kris Van Hees wrote:
I have a WinXP box that has plaintext password enabled. I have a Samba 3.0
CVS server that also does not use encrypted passwords (uses PAM). I cannot
connect to shares from the WinXP box because apparantly the non-encrypted
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:39:26PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:59:58PM -0500, Kris Van Hees wrote:
I have a WinXP box that has plaintext password enabled. I have a Samba 3.0
CVS server that also does not use encrypted passwords (uses PAM). I cannot
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:59:47PM -0500, Joe Meslovich wrote:
I retried the configure in 3.0 using --with-libiconv=/usr/local, and it
failed in the same way.
I then downloaded the latest version of HEAD and it did the same thing
either way that I ran it.
Ok, another question: do you have
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:24:09AM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
I'm going to do a very brief writeup of NT_CREATE_ANDX, but I remember
hearing rumors dark lurking daemons. What do I need to know? What is there
about this command that should be documented?
It's *monstrous*. There
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:54:00PM -0500, Kris Van Hees wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:39:26PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:59:58PM -0500, Kris Van Hees wrote:
I have a WinXP box that has plaintext password enabled. I have a Samba 3.0
CVS server that
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Peter Hurley
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bug fix?: 2.2.7a, printing/printing.c, print_queue_resume()
With W2k workstation and Samba print server running LPRng:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Peter Hurley
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Question about srv_spoolss_send_event_to_client()
In rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:srv_spoolss_send_event_to_client():
Could
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:28:32PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:24:09AM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
I'm going to do a very brief writeup of NT_CREATE_ANDX, but I remember
hearing rumors dark lurking daemons. What do I need to know? What is there
about
hi ppl,
Need some help.
We usually put policy file in the netlogon dir.What if we have 15 to 20
policy files.Can samba2.4-stable6 handle this.
regards,
Poornima Marattil
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Poornima Marattil wrote:
hi ppl,
Need some help.
We usually put policy file in the netlogon dir.What if we have 15 to 20
That is a BAD place to put them! Profiles should preferably go into a
separate Profiles share. Each profile should go under it's own directory
within
Hi everyone,
One of my teammates here at HP uncovered this, and I thought it deserved
proactive mention on the list:
It covers non-HP builds of Samba, so HP CIFS Server (HP's version of Samba
bundled with all 11.0 and above OS'es) customers are not directly affected
but those of you on the list
24 matches
Mail list logo
