Re: bug or typo in smbd/service.c: make_connection_snum(line 530)?

2003-03-11 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 12:16, Chere Zhou wrote: > The block reads: > > if (conn->force_user || conn->force_group) { > > /* groups stuff added by ih */ > conn->ngroups = 0; > conn->groups = NULL; > > /* Find all the groups thi

Re: Samba 3.0 Alpha22 + AD Domain, RedHat Kerberos Problems

2003-03-11 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 13:05, ODC wrote: > Herb Lewis wrote: > > The bad encryption type message happens if you have never changed > > the administrator password on the PDC and you try to join the domain. > > Did you successfully join the domain? > > > > ODC wrote: > > > > I believe I have joined

BUG: case sensitive = no, CPU utilization

2003-03-11 Thread Bayhi Ingona
[originally posted as PRIVATE (PR#26715)] Full_Name: Bayhi Ingona Samba_Version: 3.0alpha22 Server_OS: Debian 3.0r1 + Kernel 2.4.20 Client_OS: Windows XP + SP1 If "case sensitive = no", Samba crawls when a program on the client machine tries to scan through every file in a directory that contai

2.2.8pre2 Compiler Warnings On Digital Unix 4.0D

2003-03-11 Thread Boyce, Nick
Following up my post on 4.March.2003 reporting ./configure failure on DU 4.0D for Samba 2.2.8pre2 --with-pam, I have now configured & compiled 2.2.8pre2 --with-winbind (but no PAM), and want to report the selection of scary warnings that the Compaq C compiler throws up by default. The following is

FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22

2003-03-11 Thread Nir Soffer
Something our QA department stumbled on: I try to log on to my Samba 3.0a22 installation (make, make install, the usual shebang). The client name is CACOMISTLE (not the NativeOS), the user name is nirs, (not the domain). Any ideas or thoughts, or are we doing something incredibly stupid? (I'v

Re: Samba non-oplock performance on Solaris 7/8

2003-03-11 Thread David Collier-Brown -- Customer Engineering
Nastasi, John wrote: > Do you know if there are any issues with Samba running on > Solaris that would cause the application to run "very, very" > slow with oplocks turned off? No, and that's the kind of problem we should raise with the Samba team: I'm cc'ing this to them.

Re: smb.conf inside ldap

2003-03-11 Thread Stefan Voelkel
Guenther Deschner wrote: hi, On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:05:26PM +0100, Stefan Voelkel wrote: Hello, I would like to hold the smb.conf inside an ldap server. Is there any work going on in implementing a ldap-config-file-backend? not that i know. but there was some effort in samba-tng for this

Re: winbind daemon not running

2003-03-11 Thread Jay
Hi Don, Thanks for the pointer. I got the winbindd daemon run properly. I add winbind option to smb.conf and voila! I successfully run it an enable to get information in my PDC. --Jay On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 05:36:22 -0800 "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jay, The answer is

Re: Samba 3.0 Alpha22 + AD Domain, RedHat Kerberos Problems

2003-03-11 Thread Herb Lewis
We had this same problem at connectathon. All I had to do was Go to the ADS machine, login as the user, and change the password. The current released version of MIT kerberos worked fine after that. It appears that MS does not create all the required encryption types for the password until the firs

Re: FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22

2003-03-11 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Nir Soffer wrote: > > Something our QA department stumbled on: > > I try to log on to my Samba 3.0a22 installation (make, make install, the > usual shebang). The client name is CACOMISTLE (not the NativeOS), the > user name is nirs, (not the domain). > Any ideas or thoughts, or are we doing somet

Re: Samba 3.0 Alpha22 + AD Domain, RedHat Kerberos Problems

2003-03-11 Thread Simo Sorce
the fact is that, imho, MS can't (haven't looked too colsely, but I had to change the password too as tridge howto on ads say). When you make a server be an ADS it simply makes an upgrade and it does not have the clear text password to do all the other encryptions. Simo. On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 18

RE: FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22

2003-03-11 Thread Nir Soffer
> Nir Soffer wrote: > > > > Something our QA department stumbled on: > > > > I try to log on to my Samba 3.0a22 installation (make, make > install, the > > usual shebang). The client name is CACOMISTLE (not the > NativeOS), the > > user name is nirs, (not the domain). > > Any ideas or thoughts

Re: FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22

2003-03-11 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Nir Soffer wrote: : : > It seems to me that a more correct fix would be, in the case of encrypt > passwords = no, to request a normal password and not a UNICODE one. Is > this even possible in the protocol? (e.g - request non-unicode passwords, > but still support non-unicode filenames?) Unicode i

Re: Samba 3.0 Alpha22 + AD Domain, RedHat Kerberos Problems

2003-03-11 Thread Herb Lewis
This is also the case for a completely new install where you set up the machine to be an ADS initially. There you just finished entering the plaintext password so they cannot use that as an excuse. Personally I think they just "blew it" (either intentionally or accidently) because they didn't test

Missing configure script after cvs download

2003-03-11 Thread David Collier-Brown -- Customer Engineering
I wrote earlier about cvs because source/configure disappeared after I did a cvs download... trying to diagnose it left me debugging cvs (;-)) Anyoen know if cvs ... co -r HEAD samba should cause source/configure to not be downloaded? --dave -- David Collier-Brown, | Always do right.

RE: FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22

2003-03-11 Thread Nir Soffer
> Nir Soffer wrote: > : > : > > It seems to me that a more correct fix would be, in the > case of encrypt > > passwords = no, to request a normal password and not a > UNICODE one. Is > > this even possible in the protocol? (e.g - request > non-unicode passwords, > > but still support non-unicode

RE: Joining domains specifying auth realm

2003-03-11 Thread Ken Cross
Here's a patch for net_ads.c that will allow the realm to be specified with -U, such as: net ads join -U [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is for SAMBA_3_0 -- I presume it's very similar for HEAD. I noticed that net is getting this message: net in free(): warning: chunk is already free. It gets it wi

Re: Missing configure script after cvs download

2003-03-11 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 10:04:51AM -0500, David Collier-Brown -- Customer Engineering wrote about 'Missing configure script after cvs download': > I wrote earlier about cvs because source/configure > disappeared after I did a cvs download... trying to > diagnose it left me debugging cvs (;-)) >

RE: Samba Performance on Solaris 7/8

2003-03-11 Thread David Collier-Brown -- Customer Engineering
"Nastasi, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: --- I almost thought I had the problem licked yesterday by leaving oplocks on, and utilizing the veto oplock option to selectively exclude certain file types. Going this route, I was able to exclude both .MDB and .DBF file types with no degradation in per

Re: FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22

2003-03-11 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Nir Soffer wrote: : > FWIW turning off unicode with unicode=no helps somewhat, and both ethereal and Samba > parse the session request correctly: > > [2003/03/11 20:11:30, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(732) > Domain=[CACOMISTLE] NativeOS=[Windows 2000 2195] NativeLanMan=[Windows >

Re: Samba 3.0 Alpha22 + AD Domain, RedHat Kerberos Problems

2003-03-11 Thread ODC
Herb Lewis wrote: We had this same problem at connectathon. All I had to do was Go to the ADS machine, login as the user, and change the password. The current released version of MIT kerberos worked fine after that. It appears that MS does not create all the required encryption types for the passw

Re: Samba 3.0 Alpha22 + AD Domain, RedHat Kerberos Problems

2003-03-11 Thread Herb Lewis
This is only true for accounts that existed before the server became an ADS (administrator being the most important since you need that to join the domain). After you are up and running as an ADS I think new users get created correctly. ODC wrote: > > Herb Lewis wrote: > > We had this same probl

Re: bug or typo in smbd/service.c: make_connection_snum(line 530)?

2003-03-11 Thread Chere Zhou
Thanks for the explanation. That helps. On Tuesday 11 March 2003 12:52 am, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 12:16, Chere Zhou wrote: > > The block reads: > > > > if (conn->force_user || conn->force_group) { > > > > /* groups stuff added by ih */ > >

Re: Samba 3.0 Alpha22 + AD Domain, RedHat Kerberos Problems

2003-03-11 Thread ODC
Herb Lewis wrote: This is only true for accounts that existed before the server became an ADS (administrator being the most important since you need that to join the domain). After you are up and running as an ADS I think new users get created correctly. Interesting. Just to clarify, by ADS we're

Fixed: Re: 3.0a21 and HEAD: only primary group of a domain user isset on smbd

2003-03-11 Thread Chere Zhou
Turns out that because I do not have nsswitch, I need to hack sys_getgrouplist to query winbind for domain users. Did not have to do that for 2.2.x. I should have said that I am on FreeBSD. Anyway, thanks for all the answers. Chere On Tuesday 04 March 2003 11:48 pm, Andrew Bartlett wrote:

Re: [scottprive@earthlink.net: Re: Information on Samba QA process,Regression testsuites]

2003-03-11 Thread Martin Pool
Please let's have this conversation on the list. > I have Martin's "notes.txt" (Notes on Samba Testing Framework for > Unittests). I think I misunderstood, and assumed there was a working (if > immature) basic framework that hadn't been checked in yet. > > OK, we're at the planning stage? Some q

RE: Samba Performance on Solaris 7/8 (oplocks)

2003-03-11 Thread David Collier-Brown -- Customer Engineering
Could someone add a one-liner to the FAQs about the .mdb/.dbf/.shp spcial case? --dave John wrote: | I did. The ESRI MapObjects part of our application, | however, doesn't like being denied an exclusive lock on | those .shp files -- despite the fact that it only needs | to open them for read acce

Need help with unknown browsing problem

2003-03-11 Thread Rob Brichler
I am having a very bizzare problem and it doesn't seem like the answer is in any FAQ, documentation, or website that i've seen. Maybe someone can help me out. I have RedHat 8.0, running samba. I want to share a printer and some folders with my Windows computers. I set up samba like i'm suppos

JSPÐéÄâÖ÷»úÈ«ÃæÉý¼¶,Êý¾Ý¿â×Ô¶¯±¸·Ý£¬Ö§³Ö×î¸ß°æ±¾£¡

2003-03-11 Thread sanry
尊敬的客户,你好! 时创网络秉承“与时并进,不断创新”的精神,在全国率先推出了支持JSP 的虚拟主机被业界一致看好!现在我们的JSP虚拟主机全面升级成功,支持 最高版本,数据库自动备份! JSP高级空间全面支持TOMCAT4.1.8及WEB界面MANAGER 支持 CGI PERL5.6 PHP4(带2.X加速器) JSP1.2 Servlet2.3 支持 (独立CGI-BIN,WEB-INF,CONTEXT+Javamail1.2) 支持 J2SDK1.4.1 EJB 支持 SQL SERVER2000、MYSQL(不限空间),数据库自动备份 支持 多WEB-CONTEXT 支持 WE

Missing files on FindFirst

2003-03-11 Thread Steven French
Missing file on ls to Windows XP ... I was testing a new drop of my CIFS vfs client code (version 0.7.0) today and noticed something interesting sometimes missing one file between FindNext responses. So file.55 was not returned in the transact two responses but file.54 was (it ends the

Re: How to verify the domain secret is good or bad?

2003-03-11 Thread Chere Zhou
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 01:23 pm, Scott Prive wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Chere Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 3:40 PM > Subject: How to verify the domain secret is good or bad? > > > I know there is the c

Re: How to verify the domain secret is good or bad?

2003-03-11 Thread Scott Prive
- Original Message - From: "Chere Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Scott Prive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 4:49 PM Subject: Re: How to verify the domain secret is good or bad? > On Tuesday 11 March 2003 01:23 pm, Scott Prive

How to verify the domain secret is good or bad?

2003-03-11 Thread Chere Zhou
I know there is the command "wbinfo -t". But when it says that "could not check secret", how do I know it's the secret is bad, or something else wrong, like winbind went crazy maybe? Also, sometimes I saw problems like "wbinfo -t" just says "secret is bad", when all the daemons were running.

Re: How to verify the domain secret is good or bad?

2003-03-11 Thread Scott Prive
- Original Message - From: "Chere Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 3:40 PM Subject: How to verify the domain secret is good or bad? > I know there is the command "wbinfo -t". But when it says that "could not > check sec