s way.
That's not a safe solution, since you won't have control over the server
once you release your client software.
Good luck!
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ot message, so it gets sent to port 138.
Weird, yes. Still, that seems to be the way it was designed.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.u
ture that shows it (an Ethereal capture would be
best...www.ethereal.com...it's free).
Windows... well, I suppose it would be easier to imagine, but I'd still
want to see the capture.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- h
ba has this bug. Samba is written such that it should complete
one operation before starting the next, so even if we did fail to reset
the timer the keepalive message would follow the READ RAW, and not be lost
within it.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- C
IP addresses, the second WINS server will be used if the
first could not resolve the NetBIOS name to an address.
Note that it is dangerous to have a single node using multiple namespaces.
NBT was not designed to work that way, and conflicts can occur.
Chris -)-----
--
Samba Team -- htt
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:41:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please resend with a mailer that doesn't wrap at 80 columns :-).
>
> Jeremy.
Looks more like 60 columns.
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://j
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:41:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please resend with a mailer that doesn't wrap at 80 columns :-).
>
> Jeremy.
Looks more like 55 c
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://j
ive will contain the bytes { 0x85, 0, 0, 0 } and
that's it. You should be able to recognize those and simply discard them.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, un
afe, so I changed it to
> use STR_UPPER.
Please check that the correct patch was applied. I believe Richard Sharpe
(who is the primary maintainer of libsmbclient) has applied a fix, which
should be in the current CVS.
Thanks!
Chris -)-
PS. Will you be at the Samba/eXPo con
but it may not get done in time.
>
> see http://samba.org/~tridge/hack/diffs.txt for a patch that shows
> what I'm doing.
I need to finish this book thing this week, so I will have to catch up
later. Perhaps at SambaXP. I'll try not to ask too many questions. :)
Chris -)--
t; complient we would need to defer the TID and VUID interpretation to
> each of the reply functions, rather than doing it in the general SMB
> parse/reply code.
I really want to know more about your NTVFS rewrite. :)
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)-
-
> Nir Soffer -=- Exanet Inc. -=- http://www.evilpuppy.org
> "Father, why are all the children weeping? / They are merely crying son
> O, are they merely crying, father? / Yes, true weeping is yet to come"
> -- Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds, The Weeping Song
>
--
Sam
> >functions fails?
>
> ok don't fail but a warning would be good
>
>
>
> metze
> -
> Stefan "metze" Metzmacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 05:43:55PM +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Am Thursday 27 March 2003 03:43 schrieb Christopher R. Hertel:
> > Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I noticed a difference between testsmbc "smb://MYGRP" and testsmbc
> &g
ch IP address (which
interface, I suppose) will be used as the source address before sending
the datagram?
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team --
pstrcpy_base(p, workgroup, param);
> + strupper(p);
> + p += strlen(p);
> +
> if (cli_api(cli,
> param, PTR_DIFF(p,param), 8,/* params, length, max */
> NULL, 0, CLI_BUFFER_SIZE, /* data, length, max */
--
S
)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e is no DMB, or if the LMBs are not exchanging browse
information (perhaps one is a B node, or perhaps there are different
WINS serves) then you have two separate workgroups, both nmaed "FOO".
Again, it's flakey, but it's the best I've been able to come up with.
7;s worth discussing...)
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NT filesystem semantics (that's FAT,
HPFS, and NTLM for those listening at home) are carried via CIFS. Icky
poo.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uni
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 01:14:29PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
>
> > Ken,
> >
> > How would you store that information on a Unix filesystem? How do you
> > prevent users or other services from messing things up
roperties page.
>
> Is this on anybody's To-Do list?
>
> Ken
>
>
> Ken Cross
>
> Network Storage Solutions
> Phone 865.675.4070 ext 31
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)--
a way to
approximate (your best guess) of the user's intention.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
running multiple discrete copies of nmbd on different IPs -- I haven't
> seen anyone do *that* with Windows yet. :)
Yep, and they can be virtual interfaces so you only need one physical
interface.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCI
ck
that one down again, but I need the resources...
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on
these options in the smb.conf documentation.
I hope that makes a little more sense. I've seen the Avantel docs and,
well, that's why I am writing a book about how this stuff actually works.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hert
;
>
>
> Hassen CHAKER
>
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a that it needs to browse sync with the given entry. If Samba is not
aware of a WINS server it *may* not try to sync with any DMBs. *This is
pure supposition on my part.* I don't know that part of the code as well
as I should (yet). In any case, make sure you have lmhosts name
resulotion enable
yes.
> Any thoughts?
This really isn't a Samba-Technical question.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
perly terminated).
See also the !Alert box in section 2.7.2 of my book. ;l
file:///home/crh/work/docs/cifsdocs/SMB.html#SMB.7.2
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ub
That checks to see that all of the 1C IP addresses for your WINS database.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)-
cifs/SMB.html#SMB.8.5
Have fun...
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.or
am trying to finish
up several projects all at once.
> Thanks again!
We aims to please. :)
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.o
hem. I also think that smbclient needs to be tested in this regard.
Chris -)-
PS. It would also be nice (hint to others on this list) if Ethereal were
patched to read these messed-up packets correctly. :)
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
ok into providing a patch?
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
esent" error is at the NBT layer and it
would occur well before you would start signing packets. There is no SMB
exchange happening yet at the point at which that error comes up.
Do I remember correctly that there was a post from rsharpe regarding the
"*SMBSERVER" name not bein
o use
> the same negotiated session key over and over again.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter Hurley
>
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.u
ogy I was using
> actually had a different meaning, was enlightening.
Most welcome.
As it happens, I am currently working on writing the Browsing section of
my online book, so the stuff is fairly fresh in my mind. :)
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christoph
lar
to, though more limited than, the concept of forks.
I had confused this concept with Extended File Attributes (arg!), which
have to do with 32-bit access masks and such. Fixed now.
When can we just make all of this go away?
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)-
http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whole point of the NT_TRANSACT is to
allow transfers larger than 64K.
I imagine that SMB_COM_NT_TRANSACT is used with some of the more advanced
RPC calls. Am I anywhere close to the mark?
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team --
you any solutions if I don't know
what is actually wrong. I can only offer guesses.
Good luck.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www
e solution is to find the Server Service name on the remote machine.
This is typically done by sending a Node Status query and looking for a name
with a suffix byte value of 0x20.
More inline below...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> "Christopher R. Hertel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > "Christopher R. Hertel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> I am interested in looking into this, but I won't have time until the
> >> weekend.
> >
> > ...
> &
B's a "disconnect"
> message when we get a new VC=0 SessionSetup to fix this I think.
>
> I will investigate further.
>
> Jeremy.
> ===
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P LaserJet 8100DN (Using Latest PCL 6, PCL 5e, and PS Drivers)
Xerox Document Center 332 (Using Latest PS Drivers)
The Version of Samba we are running is 2.2.7a
Server: Redhat Linux 8.0, + samba-2.2.7-2 RPM package (Latest/Greatest
Version)
---
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://w
nmblookup -r -S " which issues node status and various
> things. Is that really the way to do it, and if so, is there a reason that
> the smbwrapper code doesn't use that method rather than the
> cli_session_request() method?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Derrell
--
Samba Team --
message.
The four byte header is used with both SMB over NBT and SMB over naked
TCP. It is needed so that the length of the SMB message can be
discovered. Ethereal will call this the NBT header even if you are
capturing port 445 (naked TCP transport).
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:28:32PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:24:09AM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> > I'm going to do a very brief writeup of NT_CREATE_ANDX, but I remember
> > hearing rumors dark lurking daemons. What do I need to
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:54:00PM -0500, Kris Van Hees wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:39:26PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:59:58PM -0500, Kris Van Hees wrote:
> > > I have a WinXP box that has plaintext password enabled. I have a S
Constitution to survive the first hit, and
> - the Dexterity to run fast enough to avoid being hit a second time.
I've got a fourth-level wombat teaser that's +4 on musk.
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba
I'm going to do a very brief writeup of NT_CREATE_ANDX, but I remember
hearing rumors dark lurking daemons. What do I need to know? What is there
about this command that should be documented?
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS
em. I can send an ECHO Request with
a payload as big as 16611 bytes. Curiously, at 16612 bytes and above
W2K will reset the connection. "Connection reset by peer".
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.or
st address:
255.255.255.255). Anyway, the first entry in the list of <1C> names is the
PDC. All others are BDCs.
> Thanks in advance for any info you can provide.
Hope that's somewhat useful.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS
rvers have specific quirks.
Chris -)-----
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mprovement (if any) is not worth loosing data integrity
> from my point of view.
Um... Just curious, but how are "oplocks are unreliable by definition"?
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jc
it
> performs rather than the physical world or a process because this
> maximizes the potential for it to be applied to tasks that are
> conceptually similar and, more important, to tasks that have not
> yet been conceived.
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)
tivity, but may be wrong there.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubi
ch, I *believe*, is that there may
be differences in the dirent structure between systems, but surely this is
something we've solved elsewhere.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx
ations, but that's something that should be handle-able with
./configure. It seems to me that in either case the data could be sorted
using the binary tree stuff or by qsort(). This should be fairly do-able.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christoph
.
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Security", but I can't find docs on that.
Abartlet tells me that it's specific to NTLMSSP. My question, at this
point, is: how do the client and server know to use NTLMSSP?
Digging...
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R
d using
the SecurityMode field in the NEGOTIATE_PROTOCOL_RESPONSE.
> Confidentiality I've never seen happen.
You sent to a public list, so I *hope* you didn't want confidentiality.
;)
Thanks!
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- htt
LMv2 Session Security
does not enable SMB packet signing (MAC signing). There's a different set
of registry variables for that. Perhaps they all interact with one
another...
Clues welcome.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
j
h an ip address to bypass any name
> resolution differences that may be happening between windows and unix?
Which host is at 129.219.120.138, a W2K system or the Samba server?
Again, a trace would help.
The -I option can be used to specify a unicast destination.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http
the
W2K system is answering first when the query goes out (either that, or you
are using WINS and the W2K system has registered that name in the NBNS
database).
The NT_STATUS_DUPLICATE_NAME error code seems to confirm this, but I'm not
sure.
A tcpdump trace showing ports 137 and 139 wo
let know jra that libnspr4.so and libnss3.so ARE linked
to libpthread and libthread under Solaris
this is concerning the ...
Re: Solaris fcntl CPU/Lock update
--- abartlet_asleep is now known as abartlet
--
Christopher R. Hertel -)- University of M
register the client#00 unique
name (the client service). There are others missing as well.
You can't really count on Windows to register names for all of the
services. The services seem to come and go and move to other names and
such.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/
otal length.
It didn't cause any trouble, but I fixed it (somewhere around 2.2.6, I
think).
> I'm using 2.2.1a shipped with RH connecting to the same version of Samba
> over loopback.
Good catch. Newer versions should not have this bug.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http:
old smb.conf format would still be supported for a while using the
conversion tools.
The first phase is probably a community volunteer effort. I don't have time
right now (so I should be keeping my mouth shut but, like Tim, I couldn't
resist) and I imagine other folks are equally busy or
samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hat too I note. Double slap to me! Oh, I like that!
> :)
I knew you would.
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTEC
guration he's got going.
My experience (which is not as first-hand as it should be) is that XP is
very unsure of itself in the CIFS and MS-RPC arena. It does wierd things
like forgetting to register the workgroup<00> name. Urg. No mailslots
there.
Chris -)-
--
Samba
SMB
protocol, you'll need to do a bit of reading. See:
http://ubiqx.org/cifs/References.html
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- htt
tp://www.microsoft.com/mind/1196/cifs.asp
>
> What do you folks think? Is this just a mix-up of terms?
>
> ---
> Andrew C. Eshmail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Adaptec, Inc.
> 2905 Northwest Blvd., Suite 20763-557-9005 (main)
> Plymouth, MN 55441-2644 USA
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:26:16PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
>
> > The SNIA doc provides information on Message Authentication Codes (MACs).
> > These are signatures contained in the SMB header.
> >
> > Are th
.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27;s in there (or what
*might* be in there) then it will probably make you think of NDR. I would
not have recognized it, but others on the Team know this stuff so well
that it's second nature.
> > Have a great night,
I'll do my best. :)
You too.
Chridz -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
act that it also offers the Domain Master Browser service.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
O
> --
> Home: Olaf Barthel, Gneisenaustrasse 43, D-31275 Lehrte
> Net: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Home), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Work)
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- h
; Hope this helps.
Thanks, Ken, but it's not really what I'm trying to figure out. The
problem, though, is in my presentation of the question.
More...
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:26:43PM +, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 12:41:34AM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel w
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 05:30:45AM +, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:13:38PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> > I *think* it's a rule that Kerberos authentication is always used with
> > SMB over TCP (port 445) and that Kerberos is *not* us
I *think* it's a rule that Kerberos authentication is always used with
SMB over TCP (port 445) and that Kerberos is *not* used with SMB over NBT
(port 139).
Am I wrong?
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team --
SMB filesystem, and a few others. I don't think that there really
is a "fix" for this problem. Not on the client side, anyway.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx d
//www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ittle lost with regard to such things.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx
break;
case 'i':
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 02:23:13PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:51:24AM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
>
> > That would be great. Please also look at the -L option too, as that
> > should default to 139 as well. (Sort of... it's no
erver, etc.).
They'd want -p to be authoritative, rather than just explicit. :)
Thanks!
Chris -)-
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:33:40AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:08:32AM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
>
> > So, smbclient should default to
ts sent by Samba include a 'Netbios Session
> Service' header. Is this the cause of the failure, or is the Windows
> messaging service inextricably bound to NetBIOS? In the former case,
> where would I look in the code to remove the NetBIOS header from the
> packet?
>
&g
s, but they will contain no entries.
> > I assume the above was against a W2K server, yes?
>
> Yep.
Kewl.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- htt
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 09:29:04PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 08:40:45PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> > Note also that none of the calls appear to work properly on port 445. If
> > the call is made on 445 a Windows server will respond, b
se
> one of the other RPC-aware tools (e.g., 'net share')? In that case,
> what should be done for libsmbclient, which also has this problem?
>
> --
> Steve Langasek
> postmodern programmer
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
or specify the location with a ./configure
> option.
>
> James Willard
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That looks to be it. I will give it a try when I have more time tomorrow.
Thanks for the clue!
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCI
e run across this?
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
> cheers,
> ++
> |Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
> |*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba /
> |__/
--
Samba Team --
UBIQXFAVOG
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://
resting approach. Hmmm...and it could work. Possibly.
I think that the problem would be the NBT layer itself.
Naming, in particular.
I'm not sure that it's a worth-while endeavor, but it is an interesting
idea.
Chris -)-
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christoph
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That helps. Thanks!
I wonder why that never made it into the doc...
Chris -)-
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 07:36:56PM -0500, Green, Paul wrote:
> Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] asked:
> > There doesn't seem to be any documentation regarding the CAP_NT_FIND
>
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
