Hello all,
Please do not send unsubscribe requests to the mailing list, they just
go into the spam filter quarantine area where usually no one reads them.
The same thing happens to posts that use MIME with no plain text component.
I do not know of any mailing list software that will accept su
If you are trying to subscribe to the SAMBA-VMS mailing list, you need
to follow the instructions at the SAMBA.ORG mailing list web pages.
Sending subscription requests to the mailing list just go into the spam
filter, which means that they will probably be deleted unread.
Also if you send th
Luiz Guilherme Regis Emediato wrote:
Hi,
This command is commented out in SAMBA_STARTUP.COM which is
run inside of SYSTARTUP_VMS.COM. I have them installed and if
I remove the comment sign it works fine as a work around.
However the problem with TCP/IP remains, that is, why didn't
the ECO patch
dhruva wrote:
Michael Ober wrote:
>
> No. VMS is one of the few, if not the only, file system that supports
> versioning. As a result, no version of Samba support versioning.
To add to this response: Samba in it's current form does not support
this feature. However, using the VFS layer archi
King Andrew J wrote:
Hi all,
Can you please confirm what/which is the latest release of Samba for Alpha
VMS is and where I can pick it up from. The reason for asking is that I can
remember some time ago there were 2 slight different releases and that they
were to be joined together to combine t
Michael Ober wrote:
Is HP adding their Pathworks EXTAUTH module to their Samba Port for VMS?
It is in the current plans to support external authentication with
OpenVMS CIFS instead of Advanced Server.
The exact method is still to be determined, as alternative
implementations are being looke
Ryan Lolli wrote:
I just installed HP OpenVMS Common Internet File System (CIFS) and when I
execute any commands I get the following error. Does anyone know how to fix
this?
unknown_domain_COLA$ testparm
%DCL-W-ACTIMAGE, error activating image SECURESHRP
-CLI-E-IMGNAME, image file $1$DGA1
Ben Armstrong wrote:
John E. Malmberg wrote:
Wouldn't Samba be quite a different matter, then? I'd expect most
applications that use VMS Samba would be running on non-VMS systems, so
non-VMS semantics are perfectly appropriate. So it sounds like setting
DECC$EFS_FILE_TIMESTAMPS
Ben Armstrong wrote:
I am working on several issues that prevent me from using the subversion
client (either on Windows or Linux) on a VMS Samba ODS-5 fileshare. I
have two patches and one workaround so far*, but require more assistance
to solve this one.
Samba's [.vms]utime.c seems to use t
Ross Smith wrote:
A quick question to the list: Has anyone installed HP's alpha release?
Yes.
Does it work of any of you?
It is somewhat functional, but there is a lot of work still needed on it.
It was in use at the OpenVMS bootcamp and was used to serve the
presentations. I do not thi
Quoted from the HP announcement:
We are pleased to announce the availability of the HP OpenVMS Common
Internet File System (CIFS) IA64 "evaluation" kit.
The HP OpenVMS Common Internet File System (CIFS) provides users with
seamless file and print interoperability between OpenVMS and
Windows-ba
Apparently for some time, the mailing list is receiving unsubscribe
messages from an auto-responder to viruses or spam that is spoofing the
samba.org domain.
The mailing list managers at samba.org thought they had a block on this,
but apparently it is not working yet as they have just been inf
COLLOT Jean-Yves wrote:
This is true.
The NMBD.PID file contains the PID of the NMBD process. When NMBD starts, it
reads that file, and checks if that PID is a living process. If it is, NMBD
thinks that another NMBD is already running, and stops.
Obviously, this is a typical Unix scheme, but it
Michael D. Ober wrote:
> To the VMS engineering team, is this still accurate?
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/network/CIFS_for_Samba.html
> If so, will password synchronization and external
> authentication features be implemented?
As I understand it, it is in the plans for the production release. I
Dr Robert Young wrote:
With guidance from some people on the list, I was able to get the
smbpasswd set correctly, and I can access my VMS directories now.
However I have a question
In my tinkering I had issued a TCPIP SET NOVERV SMBB as part of my
efforts to "clean out" things between
Kikelj, Gorazd wrote:
From: COLLOT Jean-Yves
This is really good news. I would have done it myself, but I
had no time for it.
When it is done, I'll be happy to put that new version on the
site where I put the 2.2.8, if you want me to. I'll be happy
to help for testing and maintaining (if n
George Blum wrote:
I am new to Samba though not to VMS. I need some help in setting up the
configuration file for Samba. I am running VMS 8.2 and have the latest
Samba compiled and installed. My questions are
The term "latest" is ambiguous. There is a 2.2.12 release in the wild
that is missi
Len Whitwer wrote:
I am running Samba (2.8) on an Alpha ES40 (7.3) VMS and everything
works great until we run multi-user with application software on our
PC's. PC systems get hung up!!
I would appreciate any help I can get along these lines.
There have been no SAMBA 2.8 releases that I
King Andrew J wrote:
Hi there,
I am new to using SAMBA on VMS and having the following problem to try an
work out.
Basic setup
VMS 7.3-2 with TCPIP 5.4 installed and working on ES47 platform
SAMBA 2.2.8
While I am not exactly familiar with your problem, can you make sure
that you are runni
BG - Ben Armstrong wrote:
Also, I still don't understand why a workaround is not possible. If
there is no workaround, several otherwise useful Unix applications
(Subversion is the one I'm interested in today, but there are others)
cannot operate on Samba ODS-2 shares because they heavily rely o
Michael Ober wrote:
Does the May 31, 2005 release of JYC's Samba 2.2.8 support OpenVMS 8.2 on
Alpha?
You will probably need to recompile and relink it.
-John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Opinion Only
PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/sma
Folks,
Convicted criminals have stated that they use these messages on phones
and probably now e-mail to steal from companies. They have stated that
the easiest way to steal from a company is to impersonate the identity
of someone known to be out of the office.
Some of these criminals have mad
The filters have been adjusted. From looking at the Samba lists, this
one was the least affected by the sober worm that is spamming in German.
I see only one instance made it through here. Some of the other lists
were mailbombed, and are now getting mis-directed bounces from mail
servers that
-net.dyndns.org/anonymous/jyc/
John E. Malmberg has mixed the 2.2.8 port with the Unix 2.2.12
version, and has done a number of changes/enhancements,
>> mostly to support VMS 8.2 and IA64.
This is very helpful. Thank you!
In fact I do have a IA64 box and so for me, maybe, the 2.2.12 version
BG - Ben Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 21:54 -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
On UNIX, the file modification date is only changed if the actual file
was changed.
On OpenVMS, the file modification date is updated because the file was
opened for write.
That's interesting.
BG - Ben Armstrong wrote:
I am using Vim on Linux to edit files on a Samba share on VMS. I am
finding that it detects a file has changed when it has not. That is,
the following dialog box appears a couple of minutes after I start
editing:
W12: Warning: File "/dyma/s/dymax/020005/bg.tas" has chang
Herriot, Nicholas, VF UK - Technology (TS) wrote:
Hello SAMBA team,
I've installed and setup a samba server 2.2.8 from binary's and
following install instructions on a: OpenVMS V7.2-1 on node WINDE1
Verify you have the lastest kit.
From windows NT. with service pack 3 I can see the node WINDE1, bu
Plante, Sylvain wrote:
Open-VMS users,
Here's the error message I'm getting trying to install Samba 1.19 for
OpenVMS 6.2-1H3
%COPY-E-OPENIN, error opening
LSL$USER_ROOT:[PLANTE.SAMBA.VERSION119]SMBD.EXE_ALPHA; as input
-RMS-E-FNF, file not fouund
Where is that SMBD.EXE_ALPHA file ? When I uncompres
Plante, Sylvain wrote:
OpenVMS Samba users,
Here's the list of error coming in compiling ( build) the latest version
of Samba. It is compiled on :
OpenVMS 6.2-1H3
DEC C compiler V5.7-004
Can you try a newer compiler? The HP (DEC) C compiler for VAX is now at
version 6.4 and I think that it sho
Plante, Sylvain wrote:
SMB-OpenVMS users,
I'm looking for a version of ( Samba 2.2.x ) which would be
running in OpenVMS 6.2-1H3 . The latest version on the web
site specifices that the prerequistes is OpenVMS 7.1 .
Is there any Archive site where I can find what I'm looking for ?
You can try build
David Gudewicz just gave me a heads up:
The URL for the mailing list seems to have changed and the old one no
longer works.
I do not know if this is a bug or a permanent change. The current
working URL is:
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba-vms
-John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Opinio
BERAMICE, Frantz wrote:
Hello,
Do you know if samba v3 for VMS is in the pipe ?
I know of some people looking at it. I am personally more interested in
looking at SAMBA V4.
Work on SAMBA V2 for UNIX except for security bug fix releases
essentially stopped well over a year ago, and probably over
Ross Smith wrote:
I'm very new to Samba.
I ran an install this morning and have 2.2.8 running on a IA64 OVMS v8.2
machine and I'm still figuring out what end is up...
Unless you have gone through the source, you may find that parts of
SAMBA think you are running on a VAX.
I noticed on the Mac OS
Tony Naidoo wrote:
Folks
I would appreciate your help...
DSA1:[KITS.SAMBA-2_0_3.SOURCE.VMS]VMS_SUP.C;134:(561)
vms_mkdir: /samba_root/private/, mode: 700
COLLOT Jean-Yves wrote:
> There is a new release available of Samba/VMS 2.2.8 at
> http://www.pi-net.dyndns.org/anonymous
Victorio Pasamontes wrote:
Hi All
Can somebody please help me get started whit SAMBA on VMS? My problem
is that I think that SAMBA is installed ok in our vms
server, but I don't know how to configure it on vms.
The same way it is configured on Unix, but some of the options do not
work yet.
And un
gérard calliet wrote:
Hello,
Where can I find documentation about the choice of naming htm files from
the documentation set in the form xxx.n_htm ?
The archives of this list, back on September 9, 2004.
The choice was made by the DETAR or UNZIP tool when it encounters
a filename that can not be rep
Michael Mazzoni wrote:
Environment: VMS v7.3 on an Alpha, Samba-VMS v2.2.8.
1) is this a Samba-VMS problem?
Yes and No.
The code that uses that logical only needs to exist on binaries for
OpenVMS 6.x and earlier. There is no reason to use those routines on
current versions of OpenVMS.
Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
Hi,
here are some minor problems I found with Samba startup and shutdown,
using Samba 2.2.8, release 2004-1021 with "SAMBA_SHUTDOWN.COM by R.
Regier 15-Sep-04":
(1) The shutdown procedure disables the services SMBD and SWAT. This is
useful (only) if you want to (tempor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a newbie with Samba on VMS.
After installing and configuring Samba 2.0.3 on VAX/VMS 5.5-2 using UCX,
if I try to update a file from my PC, the VMS crashes (panic)
The only privileged code in SAMBA 2.0.x is unlikely to be able to crash
the system.
It would take analyzi
Dave Pampreen wrote:
Hi everyone,
First off, this is my first post, so be nice :)
Background:
OpenVMS 7.2-1 (Alpha)
TCP/IP 5.3 (TCPIP_MUP V5.3-181) installed
Samba 2.2.8 (from source: SAMBA-2_2_8-OBJ-20041021.ZIP)
I have it configured and I can connect, but I had to use
SAMBA_ROOT:[BIN]SMBPASSWD t
B. Z. Lederman wrote:
On the odd chance people haven't seen this:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1728956,00.asp
German security researcher Stefan Esser has discovered
multiple vulnerabilities in smbfs, the mountable SMB (Server
Message Block) file system for Linux.
The smbfs pr
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Tillman, Brian (AGRE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John wrote:
>
>> This may or may not be an issue. I have not looked totally at this,
>> but I think it is how LANMAN usernames that can not be represented on
>> the host OS are mapped to host usernames.
>
> He
Tillman, Brian (AGRE) wrote:
A few months ago, SAMBA V2.2.8 on my three VMS system (two OpenVMS
VAX V7.2 and one OpenVMS Alpha V7.3-1) stopped working.
> Since I'm the only one actually using SAMBA connections to the
> VMS systems, I didn't bother to investigate. Today I decided to,
> but before I
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Tillman, Brian (AGRE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Brian Tillman wrote:
>
>> Here's my SMB.CONF file. This was working before and I
>> haven't changed anything on the VAXes except for stopping and
>> restarting the NMBDs:=0D
>
> Can someone tell me if my SMB.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Tillman, Brian (AGRE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John E. Malmberg wrote:
>
>> For those interested in being more on the bleeding edge, I have now
>> merged in the SAMBA 2.2.12 changes with last source kit that I
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
, "Tillman, Brian (AGRE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Does this port require FRONTPORT and your previous port did? The READMEs
> in that directory don't mention 2.2.12.
It does not use FRONTPORT.
The readmes are left over from SAMBA 2.0.6 because I thought tha
John E. Malmberg wrote:
I dropped a few lines from the previous post.
I have only done a test build on OpenVMS ALPHA 8.2 EFT at this time.
I attempted to make this code build on older versions, but as yet I
have not had time to do any test builds.
If it is found not to build/work on a release
John E. Malmberg wrote:
For those interested in being more on the bleeding edge, I have now
merged in the SAMBA 2.2.12 changes with last source kit that I produced.
In the previous 2.2.12 kit and the 2.2.8 kit, I introduced two major
bugs. One is that it bypassed the filename translation code
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
COLLOT Jean-Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now that I know that the problem appears only when the McAfee antivirus is
> there, I could fix it.
>
> I am sending a corrected version of the OBJ files directly to Rod, a "DIFF"
> of the sources directly to John, and
John E. Malmberg wrote:
In the module VMS_SUPPORT/vms_opendir(), strcpy is being used to do an
overlapping copy.
Use of strcpy/strncpy for this can produce undefined results when the
destination and source ranges overlap.
memmove() needs to be used for these.
Just found the same bug in
John E. Malmberg wrote:
In the module VMS_SUPPORT/vms_opendir(), strcpy is being used to do an
overlapping copy.
Use of strcpy/strncpy for this can produce undefined results when the
destination and source ranges overlap.
memmove() needs to be used for these.
Just found the same bug in
In the module VMS_SUPPORT/vms_opendir(), strcpy is being used to do an
overlapping copy.
Use of strcpy/strncpy for this can produce undefined results when the
destination and source ranges overlap.
memmove() needs to be used for these.
Use of strcpy/strncpy can cause a buffer overrun, which in
There is a bug in DEBUG.C that shows up when the log level is greater
than 5 and the output of SMBD is redirected to SYS$OUTPUT:
What is happening is that DEBUG calls sys_fstat() calls vms_stat() which
does check of the cache for /SYS$OUTPUT/smbd.log
Sometimes for reasons that I do not know, the
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
COLLOT Jean-Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have just posted a new release that fixes some problems that happened to
> some of you.
>
> More information and download available, as usual, at
> http://www.pi-net.dyndns.org/anonymous/jyc/
Is it easy to find the ch
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
COLLOT Jean-Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Petra Wiegmink writes:
>
>> we have installed SAMBA 2.2.8 on an OpenVMS V7.3-1 system.
>
>> It works alright, but within the last 10 days it happend twice that the
>> NMBD process was using between 55 and 90% of the CPU
For those interested in being more on the bleeding edge, I have now
merged in the SAMBA 2.2.12 changes with last source kit that I produced.
I also fixed the bug that I accidently introduced, and implemented the
fsync() on the 1 byte writes to try to improve the large file issues.
The source kit
John E. Malmberg wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
COLLOT Jean-Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So, now, try to create a printer share named SYS$PRINT, or try, on any
printer share, to print a file named TOTO$TEXT.LOG. If you remove the '$'
exemption in UTIL_SRC.C
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
COLLOT Jean-Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, there is a reason.
>
> John Malmberg wrote:
>> The module unexpected.c has a VMS specific change to suppress storing
>> of mis-directed packets in the designated TDB.
>
> I don't really know why, but I have on
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>Item on the todo list is to either have a VMS specific queue module that
>>uses the $sndjbc[w]/$getqui[w] interfaces
>
> I did a module like that last year, see
> http://www.er6.eng.ohio-state.edu/~jonesd/print_vms_2.zip
Than
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, COLLOT Jean-Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, basically the "$" character has a special signification on Unix =
> which it has not in VMS. Replacing "$" with "_" may be useful in a number of
> cases, but just let's take an example where it must not be done.
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
COLLOT Jean-Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, the reason is not a performance one, but the "optimized" Samba
> code does not correctly give the tm_isdst and the tm_gmtoff members of the
> tm struct.
Now I need to find out if this is a VMS C RTL bug or a S
The module [.smbd]server.c has a VMS specific change to prevent changing
the logfile directory from the SMBD command.
Is there any reason that this is done?
-John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Opinion Only
PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/sma
The module unexpected.c has a VMS specific change to suppress storing of
mis-directed packets in the designated TDB.
Is there any reason for this?
-John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Opinion Only
PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questio
Usha, KL wrote:
Can any one of you kindly post the documentation on installation and
configuration(SMB.CONF) of Samba on OpenVMS please?
The only known documentation is included in HTML format that may be
readable with the SWAT program.
Online documentation is also available at http://www.samba
Rabbin, Robert (GE Energy, Non GE) wrote:
I have also installed the new 2.2.8 on an Alpha workstation to try to get it
to work... it does everything but show up on the PC.
Some more specifics may be needed:
Specific version of 2.2.8? there have been several posted. Of course in
this case it may n
The module [.lib]time.c has a VMS specific edit to exempt the '$'
character from being replaced with an underscore.
So far I can not find a reason that VMS needs this change.
-John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Opinion Only
PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING:
http://www.catb
The module [.lib]time.c has a VMS specific edit to override the SAMBA
code that attempts to optimize the localtime() call.
Is there a performance reason for this change?
Are specific VMS versions affected by this?
-John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Opinion Only
PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE
Jean-Yves Collot has examined my posted changes and has discovered a bug
in the VMS_TRICKS.C
Where the old code was:
int d[2] = { 512, (int) imgname};
I replaced it with:
int d[2];
...
d[0] = 0;
d[1] = (int) imgname;
Where the interim fix would be for d[0] = 512;.
Thi
Hello all,
I have gone through the SAMBA 2.2.8 and modified it to start to take
advantage of features for VMS 8.2.
This also repairs most of the compiler diagnostics, including several
bugfixes where the compiler would not have generated the intended code.
If you are only pulling some fixes out
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Plante, Sylvain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a specific site ( archive )where I could find all the mailing
> from the latest years ?
http://www.samba.org, on Mozilla, on the left side is a list of links,
under the heading "Talk Samba". For me, the s
John E. Malmberg wrote:
That brings up another question about the UNIX SAMBA code, since the size
query is coming in on the same session that knows it has the file open,
why is stat() used instead of fstat()?
I would expect that fstat() would know the file highwater mark for it's
current
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Hank Vander Waal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Here, here !!!
>
>
>
> I too would like to thank all of you for a VERY nice product!!
>
> I have a couple of customers using SAMBA and we use it at our office.
>
> I would love to help on these projects, I have the
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
COLLOT Jean-Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't really understand what you are referring to, but I am positive
> that there is not any use of HAVE_MMAP in any C file of Samba/VMS version
> 2.2.8. There is no any call to mmap() either, and the "mmap" paramete
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Brodie, R (Richard) wrote:
>
>>J. Malmberg wrote:
>>The stat() or fstat() functions should return the correct results of
>>the real size of the file. In the standard fields, they should have the =
>>highest byte written in the file.
>
> The CRTL manual notes:
>
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
COLLOT Jean-Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since Dave Jones provided a new, VMS-specific TDB set of routines, defining
> HAVE_MMAP or not has no more impact on Samba/VMS.
What about the file transfer section of SAMBA where if HAVE_MMAP is set, and
the smb.conf
Brodie, R (Richard) wrote:
The stat() or fstat() functions should return the correct results of the
real size of the file. In the standard fields, they should have the
>>highest byte written in the file.
The CRTL manual notes:
'be aware that for st_size to report a correct value, you need to flush
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
COLLOT Jean-Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi.
>
> Now let's see the 1-byte writes and QFILE_INFOs requests.
>
> It looks like those actions are done by the client in order to provoke
> extensions of the allocated file space, before actually writing into it.
> Un
BG - Ben Armstrong wrote:
- show process/acc on the user's smbd process
show proc/acc/quota may provide mroe information.
Accounting information:
Buffered I/O count:193317 Peak working set size: 14640
Direct I/O count: 44366 Peak virtual size: 184880
What is the physical
As these messages are being suppressed in last release of SAMBA 2.2.8,
it is probably useful to indicate what the impacts of suppressing them are.
With a program as complex as SAMBA, if any of these are causing a
problem, it may be difficult to notice in all cases.
I am still trying to get all
Jeffrey Coffield wrote:
I have a customer who wants to put dots in a directory name. Since the
share is on an ODS-5 disk, this is possible for VMS but Samba 2.2.8 does
not seem to follow the VMS convention of using a ^ in front of a dot.
The ^ convention only applies to filenames in VMS format of
BG - Ben Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 10:22 -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
My guess is that if you do not use VFC file types the problem will go away.
That may prove difficult to carry off considering the large number of
files in a variety of different directories involved on our
BG - Ben Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 10:40 -0300, BG - Ben Armstrong wrote:
I am still trying to get familiar with this code, but I am finding
references to special handling if SAMBA detects that it is a VMS text file.
Any VMS file that is not a stream or a fixed record size file may g
As there was no response, I have entered this into Bugzilla for tracking.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1816
-John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Opinion Only
PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
RR - Rod Regier wrote:
(n.b. a shorter version of this was reported to JYC in August,
but he was unable to reproduce the failures).
Summary: Some intermittent file corruption is occuring.
We would like to provide a good test case, but such eludes us.
Since corruption is seri
Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, John E. Malmberg wrote:
However, at the time of the open request, the vfs module can take out a
VMS lock on the filespec, and that will provide a cluster wide protection.
... as long as you only run Samba on one node in the cluster ...
As a VMS lock is
Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, John E. Malmberg wrote:
By delaying the open until there is actual data to write or the client has
specified the resulting size, then Method A can be used.
[Deleted all the rest of the context because I only wanted to reply to
this point.]
I do not think
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
BG - Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 08:32 -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
>> And it is not preallocation that SAMBA is doing as noted below.
>
> Oh? It sure looked like it ...
If you look at it fro
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
" RR - Rod Regier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>- TC029
Where are these tracking numbers coming from? They do not look like SAMBA
Bugzilla numbers.
Is this problem reproducable with a UNIX SAMBA implementation of 2.2.8 or
later?
Is there a SAMBA Bugzilla en
If anyone posting is not getting the AAD challenges, can you let them
know that their challenge response system is badly broken, and needs
to be configured to never challenge posts to mailing lists that their
users have subscribed to.
Neither answering the challenges or sending notes to their role
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, COLLOT Jean-Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Once again, I am sorry, but it looks like I don't understand.
>
> As far as I know, Ben pointed out a problem of performances when writing
> files on a Samba/VMS 2.2.8 server from an XP client. I could reproduce that
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
COLLOT Jean-Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Excuse me, but I don't agree. I just ran Ben's "ruby" bench, which is
> creating that 1 Kb file, and I can see the very, very slow =
> behaviour: it takes more than 36 seconds to run the bench
> (compared to 2.35
COLLOT Jean-Yves wrote:
Hi.
- BENCH.TMP is a 1 Kb local file (the file created by Ben's ruby bench)
Hello Jean-Yves,
In order to see the slow behavior, the file transfer has to be greater
than 64,000 Kb. With smaller files, it will not be seen.
Ben,
There is nothing that I can find in the VM
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
BG - Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 18:32 -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
>> What version of SAMBA is running on the LINUX system?
>
> Samba 3.0.7 + smbfs 3.0.7.
>
>> Other than that, I am
BG - Ben Armstrong wrote:
Hi,
Here is an analysis of my next test, supplemental to my earlier
observations about WinXP -> OpenVMS samba write performance.
If you want to skip the details and cut to the chase, it seems that both
when WinXP talks to a Linux samba server and when Linux talks to a
Open
Is there code in the SAMBA 2.2.8 port to deal with mapping the VMS job
number to a range that will work for SAMBA?
The VMS job number is an unsigned 32 bit integer, and the SMB protocol
can only handle a 16 bit integer.
So there needs to be a dynamic mapping of VMS job numbers to SMB job
numbe
Ashot Bord wrote:
JY, thanks for trying it out!
I ran it on SIMH, the simulator. It is not speedy for CPU, but fast with IO.
It may as well be that the CPU speed is the cause of the broken socket, but FTP
in service mode doesn't have any sensible delays and doesn't time-out,
and it also spawns a
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
BG - Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have observed that a Linux 2.6 client using smbfs completes a simple
> "write large files" benchmark of our own devising* 10 times faster than
> a Windows client on the same network with the same load! This su
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
COLLOT Jean-Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This would indicate that something in SWAT is doing a translation.
>
> Yes, sure, something does. A piece of VMS-specific code in CGI.C keeps only
> the first dot(.) and replaces all subsequent dots by underscores(_).
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Ashot Bord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John Malmberg wrote:
>>The HTML documentation as provided by SAMBA can not be read on VAX or
>>ALPHA with current browsers, as VAX does not support multiple dots in a
>>filename, and Mozilla does not either, even on ODS-5.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1763
The HTML documentation as provided by SAMBA can not be read on VAX or
ALPHA with current browsers, as VAX does not support multiple dots in a
filename, and Mozilla does not either, even on ODS-5.
Nor can the documentation be stored on strictly comp
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
