Re: [Savonet-users] Questions about delay and switch

2008-05-24 Thread Benoït Leudet
It works! Indeed, the difference is subtle but important. But I'm sure I have tried with 30s and it didn't work (in my opinion, I had to change something else at the same time). In any case it works, thanks again. -

Re: [Savonet-users] Questions about delay and switch

2008-05-16 Thread Benoït Leudet
David Baelde a écrit : I don't think you can get anything precise from icecast. Still imprecise, you can play with harbor's buffer: input.harbor(buffer=80.,...). A little less should be better actually, since other buffers come into play in the pipeline, before and after liquidsoap. I

Re: [Savonet-users] Questions about delay and switch

2008-03-19 Thread Benoït Leudet
Thanks for your answer, things are more clear now :) Then if you need a really low latency, try using jack... or at worse the very experimental RTP. About the delay, I see I was not clear in my post, I wanted to make it short: we shoutcast competition matches and we have TV servers to see

Re: [Savonet-users] Questions about delay and switch

2008-03-19 Thread Romain Beauxis
Le Wednesday 19 March 2008 10:19:03 Benoït Leudet, vous avez écrit : The listeners need to pause the audio stream for 80s to synchronize with the TV. We would like to reduce the delay for the listeners, so we need to increase the delay for the live session. It's an interestin issue.. So far we

Re: [Savonet-users] Questions about delay and switch

2008-03-19 Thread Samuel Mimram
Romain Beauxis wrote: Le Wednesday 19 March 2008 10:19:03 Benoït Leudet, vous avez écrit : The listeners need to pause the audio stream for 80s to synchronize with the TV. We would like to reduce the delay for the listeners, so we need to increase the delay for the live session. It's an

Re: [Savonet-users] Questions about delay and switch

2008-03-19 Thread Benoït Leudet
I don't think we have an operator for that, but it should not be difficult to implement.. I know my request is particular but if you can implement it, it will be really magic :) Is it possible anyway to tell icecast to have a precise sync? You can increase a pre-buffer with

Re: [Savonet-users] Questions about delay and switch

2008-03-19 Thread Benoït Leudet
David Baelde a écrit : I don't think you can get anything precise from icecast. Still imprecise, you can play with harbor's buffer: input.harbor(buffer=80.,...). A little less should be better actually, since other buffers come into play in the pipeline, before and after liquidsoap. I tried

Re: [Savonet-users] Questions about delay and switch

2008-03-19 Thread Benoït Leudet
You have the same problem here. Only one sequence is ever built, so only one jingle will be ever played. If you want one introductory jingle any time you switch back to a playlist, use a transition: def start(a,b) sequence([jingle,b]) end playlists = switch(track_sensitive=false,