It works!
Indeed, the difference is subtle but important. But I'm sure I have
tried with "30s" and it didn't work (in my opinion, I had to change
something else at the same time).
In any case it works, thanks again.
-
T
Hi Benoit, hi list,
I feel bad that I'm only looking seriously at this transition problem
now. I opened a ticket (http://savonet.rastageeks.org/ticket/127) in
order to address it before the release but I just realized that it
isn't a bug at all. The sad thing is that Romain already pointed out
the
David Baelde a écrit :
> I don't think you can get anything precise from icecast. Still
> imprecise, you can play with harbor's buffer:
> input.harbor(buffer=80.,...). A little less should be better actually,
> since other buffers come into play in the pipeline, before and after
> liquidsoap.
>
You have the same problem here. Only one sequence is ever built, so
only one jingle will be ever played. If you want one introductory
jingle any time you switch back to a playlist, use a transition:
def start(a,b)
sequence([jingle,b])
end
playlists = switch(track_sensitive=false, trans
David Baelde a écrit :
I don't think you can get anything precise from icecast. Still
imprecise, you can play with harbor's buffer:
input.harbor(buffer=80.,...). A little less should be better actually,
since other buffers come into play in the pipeline, before and after
liquidsoap.
I tried t
I don't think you can get anything precise from icecast. Still
imprecise, you can play with harbor's buffer:
input.harbor(buffer=80.,...). A little less should be better actually,
since other buffers come into play in the pipeline, before and after
liquidsoap.
It's funny that you broadcast audio a
I don't think we have an operator for that, but it should not be difficult to
implement..
I know my request is particular but if you can implement it, it will be
really magic :)
Is it possible anyway to tell icecast to have a precise sync?
You can increase a "pre-buffer" with
Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Wednesday 19 March 2008 10:19:03 Benoït Leudet, vous avez écrit :
>> The listeners need to pause the audio stream for 80s to synchronize with
>> the TV. We would like to reduce the delay for the listeners, so we need
>> to increase the delay for the live session.
>
> It'
Le Wednesday 19 March 2008 10:19:03 Benoït Leudet, vous avez écrit :
> The listeners need to pause the audio stream for 80s to synchronize with
> the TV. We would like to reduce the delay for the listeners, so we need
> to increase the delay for the live session.
It's an interestin issue..
So far
Thanks for your answer, things are more clear now :)
Then if you need a really low latency, try using jack... or at worse
the very experimental RTP.
About the delay, I see I was not clear in my post, I wanted to make it
short: we shoutcast competition matches and we have TV servers to see
Hi,
Welcome to liquidsoap :) Romain will be glad to hear that his article
in GLMF has been effective.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Benoït Leudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, the delay:
> I need to put a delay for live sessions (30 to 90 seconds) because we
> shoutcast some games an
Hi,
Totally beginner in LiquidSoap (I discovered it in LinuxMag), I'm trying
to make a .liq and I have almost reached the end of what I want to do (I
don't understand all the concept but the possibilities of this program
are awesome and I think it deserves some headaches :) )
But I need your
12 matches
Mail list logo
