Re: need command line support of zoho

2013-03-15 Thread jdow
On 2013/03/15 20:39, Todd And Margo Chester wrote: On 03/15/2013 08:05 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: Well that depends. If its clear text and you have the right flags set it will show you all of the raw data. Wireshark can in many cases decode it further. However if it ssl/tls encrypted there is

Re: need command line support of zoho

2013-03-15 Thread jdow
The point is that he seemed to use an SSL port and he apparently found using SSL did not work. So was something else providing the SSL (or other encryption) or was the provider all fooed up? {o.o} On 2013/03/15 20:05, Paul Robert Marino wrote: Well that depends. If its clear text and you have

multi-monitor problems...

2013-03-15 Thread Steven Haigh
Hi again all, This has started to bug me in a multi-monitor setup 1) notification-daemon always seems to pop up the notifications on the Top Right (This is good) of the screen that the mouse is currently on (this is bad). Is there a way that I can tell notification-daemon to use screen #x

Re: need command line support of zoho

2013-03-15 Thread Todd And Margo Chester
On 03/15/2013 08:05 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: Well that depends. If its clear text and you have the right flags set it will show you all of the raw data. Wireshark can in many cases decode it further. However if it ssl/tls encrypted there is a tool much to most infosec peoples dismay (and joy

Re: need command line support of zoho

2013-03-15 Thread Paul Robert Marino
Well that depends.If its clear text and you have the right flags set it will show you all of the raw data.Wireshark can in many cases decode it further.However if it ssl/tls encrypted there is a tool much to most infosec peoples dismay (and joy when its useful ) called ssldump that can take a tcpdu

Re: need command line support of zoho

2013-03-15 Thread jdow
On 2013/03/15 19:14, Todd And Margo Chester wrote: On 03/15/2013 02:17 PM, Todd And Margo Chester wrote: Hi All, The connection just times out. Does anyone know what I am doing wrong here? This is Linux and the nail program. (The account does work from Thunderbird.) #!/bin/bash echo "nail te

Re: need command line support of zoho

2013-03-15 Thread Todd And Margo Chester
On 03/15/2013 02:17 PM, Todd And Margo Chester wrote: Hi All, The connection just times out. Does anyone know what I am doing wrong here? This is Linux and the nail program. (The account does work from Thunderbird.) #!/bin/bash echo "nail test" | \ nail -v \ -S smtp-use-starttls \ -S fro

Re: udev renaming ethernet adapaters to vlan names?

2013-03-15 Thread Konstantin Olchanski
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 07:12:06PM -0400, Paul Robert Marino wrote: >You don't need the ".203" in the udev rule you just need "eth1" but >that said you dont need the udev rule either the HWADDR field in the >network scripts handles it for you and overrides the dev rules. To disable t

Re: need command line support of zoho

2013-03-15 Thread Todd And Margo Chester
On 03/15/2013 02:17 PM, Todd And Margo Chester wrote: Hi All, The connection just times out. Does anyone know what I am doing wrong here? This is Linux and the nail program. (The account does work from Thunderbird.) #!/bin/bash echo "nail test" | \ nail -v \ -S smtp-use-starttls \ -S fro

Re: double precision versus single/float ?

2013-03-15 Thread Paul Robert Marino
The calculation algorithms  are the same either way so that explains the speed given identical input.As far as a single vs double float the only difference is where it truncated the resulting number so the should be the same up to the second decimal place unless the library internally is using a si

RE: udev renaming ethernet adapaters to vlan names?

2013-03-15 Thread Paul Robert Marino
You don't need the ".203" in the udev rule you just need "eth1" but that said you dont need the udev rule either the HWADDR field in the network scripts handles it for you and overrides the dev rules.-- Sent from my HP Pre3On Mar 14, 2013 10:06 PM, Steven C Timm wrote: Stephen--what is the archite

need command line support of zoho

2013-03-15 Thread Todd And Margo Chester
Hi All, The connection just times out. Does anyone know what I am doing wrong here? This is Linux and the nail program. (The account does work from Thunderbird.) #!/bin/bash echo "nail test" | \ nail -v \ -S smtp-use-starttls \ -S from=taperepo...@.com \ -S smtp-auth=login \ -S ssl-ver

Re: nspluginwrapper

2013-03-15 Thread Todd And Margo Chester
On 03/15/2013 10:12 AM, Yasha Karant wrote: Evidently, from URL: http://nspluginwrapper.org/why.html nspluginwrapper is currently the only means to run a plugin in a browser of a different architecture. It is most commonly used to run a 32-bit plugin built for x86 in a 64-bit browser built for

nspluginwrapper

2013-03-15 Thread Yasha Karant
Evidently, from URL: http://nspluginwrapper.org/why.html nspluginwrapper is currently the only means to run a plugin in a browser of a different architecture. It is most commonly used to run a 32-bit plugin built for x86 in a 64-bit browser built for x86-64 End quote and thus appears to add

Re: double precision versus single/float ?

2013-03-15 Thread Matthias Schroeder
Hi, On 03/15/2013 04:59 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote: ... Are double and float synonyms for the same double precision representation? From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_data_types: "The actual size of floating point types also varies by implementation. The only guarantee is that the long doubl

Re: double precision versus single/float ?

2013-03-15 Thread Keith Lofstrom
I'm doing some very big phased array calculations on an oldish Core2 Duo, preparing to migrate the inner loops to an nVidia GPU. These calculations do a lot of differencing when computing nulls in the interference patterns (as does nature!) and I presume that single precision will do them relative

Re: Question about Kickstart pre script busybox

2013-03-15 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Yan Xiaofei wrote: > Hello > > I found SL58 use busybox environment in %pre script in kickstart. > So some of the command failed because it different with util command. > Is there way to disable busybox in %pre script? > > > Another question: > What is the default