On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
The ultimate cause of this issue was an upgrade of glib2 by RedHat in RHEL
On 27/03/15 08:53, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
The ultimate cause of this issue was an
On 03/26/2015 06:51 PM, Kevin K wrote:
On Mar 26, 2015, at 6:37 PM, Yasha Karant ykar...@csusb.edu wrote:
My desktop workstation (currently X86-64 SL 7) has only one 802.3 physical
port. At my university, the IT gestapo will not allow the use of a local 802.3
repeater (switch or hub) but
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Tim Kanuka tim.kan...@lightsource.ca wrote:
I think having a EPEL mirror in the way described by Steve is an excellent
idea. It exactly parallels my own requirement (and I suppose any site's
requirement) of managing updates to many machines. The only way to
In that case, I'm thinking that it could be useful to maintain an EPEL
mirror that does not get updated between TUV's release and the SL release.
I could do that for my own use or it could be a community effort.
Thoughts?
Steve Gaarder
System Administrator, Dept of Mathematics
Cornell
I think having a EPEL mirror in the way described by Steve is an excellent
idea. It exactly parallels my own requirement (and I suppose any site's
requirement) of managing updates to many machines. The only way to guarantee
that you are not going to break something with an update is to test
Yasha, this is getting tiresome - your continuing use of this mailing
list to obtain free technical support for (imho) bizarre problems or wishes -
most of them complete with pity pledges please help me, our IT nazi would give
me no soup
(as in Soup Nazi,
That second NIC appears to be my only option. A colleague down the hall
does exactly that. If I did attempt NAT, as was suggested, unless the
device actually attached to the RJ-45 802.3 LAN port in the wall has the
exact same MAC address, etc., as the NIC on my workstation, the local IT
On 03/27/2015 01:39 PM, Steve Gaarder wrote:
It would be very helpful to me if I could have some idea of when SL 7.1
is likely to emerge. That will tell me whether I can just wait or need
to come up with some kind of workaround for the EPEL problem.
thanks,
Steve Gaarder
System Administrator,
On 27/03/15 18:01, Steve Gaarder wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, Akemi Yagi wrote:
One thing that is different from EPEL is that ELRepo's el7.1 packages
that are _not_ backward compatible will not install on systems 7.1.
yum will complain. My understanding is that EPEL packages do not have
such
It isn’t so much the USB. USB as a design is a master/slave relationship. So
you cannot connect 2 normal computers together with an USB cable. It doesn’t
matter what you are wanting to do with it.
There have been special USB cables in the past with some smarts in the middle
so each computer
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Kevin K kevi...@fidnet.com wrote:
It isn’t so much the USB. USB as a design is a master/slave relationship.
So you cannot connect 2 normal computers together with an USB cable. It
doesn’t matter what you are wanting to do with it.
Use two USB ethernet
12 matches
Mail list logo
