On 10/7/19 12:27 PM, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
On 7. Oct 2019, at 18:17, Jose Marques wrote:
On 7 Oct 2019, at 16:43, Fait, James F.
<0c6019404d64-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov> wrote:
The only thing concerning me so far is the lack of packages in EPEL. There
are things we use from
> On 7. Oct 2019, at 18:17, Jose Marques wrote:
>
>> On 7 Oct 2019, at 16:43, Fait, James F.
>> <0c6019404d64-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov> wrote:
>>
>> I tend to ignore ANY distribution with a .0 suffix.
>
> I'm going through the process of updating our kickstart scripts, repos, and
> On 7 Oct 2019, at 16:43, Fait, James F.
> <0c6019404d64-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov> wrote:
>
> I tend to ignore ANY distribution with a .0 suffix.
I'm going through the process of updating our kickstart scripts, repos, and
puppet config for Centos8. We (CS at St Andrews) have been
I tend to ignore ANY distribution with a .0 suffix. Wait a few versions for
the dust to settle. I am only now starting to migrate from SL6 to SL7. Also,
I have always found the CentOS version of a release much harder to get going
than the SL release. I have not yet decided what to do with
