To: Teh, Kenneth M. <0864eace5c83-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov>
Cc: scientific-linux-users
Subject: Re: Rocky Linux 8.4 General Availability
It worked for me just now to use
download.rockylinux.org/pub/rocky/8/BaseOS/x86_64/os
and select a minimal install.
Dave
On Tue, Jun 22
-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
on behalf of Teh, Kenneth M.
<0864eace5c83-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2021 12:34 PM
To: Yasha Karant ; scientific-linux-users
Subject: Re: Rocky Linux 8.4 General Availability
I tried the boot iso but it does no
I tried the boot iso but it does not have a built-in list of mirrors. I'm stuck
at the installation source. I need a url, either a specific repo or a url.
Please post if anyone knows one.
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
on behalf of
Thanks for your review of CentOS stream. Very helpful.
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
on behalf of Jose Marques
<0fd846b4f4be-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, May 4, 2021 5:57 AM
To:
I have to second Konstantin on the main drivers for linux. C++ and python.
We've opted to use Fedora for folks who want them (all desktops) but we're
sticking with CentOS-7 for servers. We have a couple of CentOS-8 appliances but
we'll be replacing them with BSD.
For those who are curious,
If you need to run a lot of commands as root, the easiest sudo method is simply
'sudo su -' which makes you into root. The trailing '-' does a login which
replaces your environment with root's.
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
on behalf
Thank you for the info. Almalinux is a candidate for me. Please continue to
post your impressions, pros and cons. Thank you.
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
on behalf of Lamar Owen
Sent: Saturday, April 3, 2021 10:39 AM
To:
There's AlmaLinux aka CloudLinux in the news recently. They are already a fork
of RHEL and not a green fields stsartup like Rocky and are looking to woo
jilted Centos users.
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
on behalf of Keith Lofstrom
Hear hear!
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
on behalf of Lamar Owen
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2020 10:04 AM
To: scientific-linux-users
Subject: Re: Update from Rocky EL
On 12/16/20 9:55 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:
> ... The question I
Software collections has gcc-9. If memory serves, SL7 has gcc-4.8.
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
on behalf of Yasha Karant
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2020 2:44 PM
To: scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov
Subject: Re: Springdale Linux
Thank
I agree with Vinicius. I used Ubuntu once but found it difficult to navigate
between it and Redhat based systems because of the FHS, because the packages
were named differently, broken up into sub-packages differently,... It was
painful waste of brain power.
I'd wait to hear how Fermilab/CERN
Thanks to everyone who replied. I successfully clone the repo.
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:06 PM
To: Teh, Kenneth M.
Cc: scientific-linux-users
Subject: Re: cloning epel 6
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 8:05 AM Teh, Kenneth M. wrote
Hello Nico,
I'm under the impression you maintain the epel repos. If I'm not mistaken, do
you have instructions for cloning them? I'm interested in preserving SL6 and
EPEL6 beyond their EOL to use for creating container images.
Have cc'd to SL list in case this gets routed to your junk
How does yum prefer sl6x.repo over sl.repo? Or, does it at all? Is there a
$releasever set to 6x squirreled away somewhere?
-users; Teh, Kenneth M.
Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] recommended sl6 containers
The plan is to retire the SL6 docker image once SL6 is end of life.
With no one watching the security updates and the repos moved over to
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http
After this November's end of life for SL6, will you continue to make the sl6
image available on docker hub?
From: Teh, Kenneth M.
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 8:15 AM
To: Patrick Riehecky; scientific-linux-users
Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS
Thanks. I've pulled it (I think).
From: Patrick Riehecky
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 8:01 AM
To: Teh, Kenneth M.; scientific-linux-users
Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] recommended sl6 containers
Hello,
We've got official images in Docker Hub
Getting my feet wet with containers. Does SL have its own registry of SL6 and
7 container images? If not, can someone recommend a reliable image?
Thanks
This is probably heresy to you but I'll pitch it anyway. I'm also a terminal,
command line person, having started with AIX in '89, and VMS before that.
I've been using Fedora with gnome 3 now for the past 3 years after I ran into
problems with outdated development tools. It is surprisingly
I actually like the enp3s0 naming convention. It maps directly to the pci
addresses. For instance, an 'lspci' shows my ethernet controller at
> 00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82579LM Gigabit Network
> Connection (Lewisville) (rev 04)
The 00:19.0 translates to enp0s25. 00 is p0,
ifconfig is going away...use ip instead. In this case 'ip addr'
The way to set static addresses is to use nmcli conn edit . The
connection names are given by 'nmcli conn show'.
You want to alter the ipv4.'s. I don't have my notes with me but off
the top of head you want to change
show-date true
>
> * Dual monitor workspace. To make it span both monitors, say::
>
> $ gsettings set org.gnome.mutter workspaces-only-on-primary false
Hope this helps.
On 10/9/19 2:15 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:10:50PM +, Teh, Kenneth M.
I agree with David. I've been using Gnome 3 since Fedora 26 and it's really
quite nice. I especially like the ability to launch an app from the keyboard
without an open terminal. The Windows or Super key is really very handy. I'm
also very fond of the Mac-style scroll. I just wish I could get
systemd based machines don't use ethX anymore. There is a more reliable naming
scheme described here.
>
"dns if not my friend." Nice!
On 9/5/19 10:02 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 12:33 PM Jon Pruente
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:47 AM Larry Linder
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It is interesting that there is a new "yum" as an RPM but do you need to
>>> install it to
When is SL6's end of life? I've looked at TUV's descriptions but I need an
explanation in layman's terms. I guess the question I'm really asking is: when
will DOE not allow us to run SL6x?
.
On 5/17/19 10:33 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:07 PM Teh, Kenneth M.
> <0864eace5c83-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov> wrote:
>> On 5/16/19 9:23 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> On 5/16/19 1:23 PM, Teh, Kenneth M. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sy
systemd cannot
read files it does not own.
On 5/16/19 9:23 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 5/16/19 1:23 PM, Teh, Kenneth M. wrote:
>> Systemd continues to baffle me.
>>
>> I've set up a router machine that provides pxe boot and tftp services on a
>> private network w
Systemd continues to baffle me.
I've set up a router machine that provides pxe boot and tftp services on a
private network with dnsmasq. Pxeboot works if I run dnsmasq manually, but not
when I turn on the service with systemctl.
I can't think through its layers of obtuseness and would
Huh? Sorry about that. The link must be mangled by some mail handling software.
The link is (on one line)
https colon slash slash dl dot google dot com slash linux slash direct
slash google-chrome-stable_current_x86_64 dot rpm
On 3/19/19 9:06 AM, Teh, Kenneth M. wrote:
> I have google-chr
I have google-chrome running on my SL7x systems without any issues. Download
the
rpm from
>
ANL just rolled out spf, dkim, and dmarc handling for emails. I've heard that
mailman lists don't play with these new requirements. I've spent this past week
reconfiguring postfix on my machines and noticed that protection.outlook.com
marks my outbound emails as having failed dkim even though
32 matches
Mail list logo
