RE: kernel panic with 2.6.32-220.2.1

-Original message- From: zxq9 Sent: Fri 13-01-2012 15:00 Subject:Re: kernel panic with 2.6.32-220.2.1 To: scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov; > On 01/13/2012 08:48 AM, Bill Maidment wrote: > > Good Morning all from Australia > > I have a problem when upgrading to the newest 6

Re: XFCE: how to clean up the trash

I'm running XFCE 4.8.0 On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Andrew Z wrote: > Hello, > i'm not sure how to add "trash" icon to the desktop in xfce and how to > clean-up the trash? > right now i had to revert to barbarian sudo rm -rf .Trash , but from > user's perspective it's just not acceptable.

XFCE: how to clean up the trash

Hello, i'm not sure how to add "trash" icon to the desktop in xfce and how to clean-up the trash? right now i had to revert to barbarian sudo rm -rf .Trash , but from user's perspective it's just not acceptable. I'm sure there is an elegant solution, but i seemed to not be able to locate it. Plea

Re: kernel panic with 2.6.32-220.2.1

On 01/13/2012 08:48 AM, Bill Maidment wrote: Good Morning all from Australia I have a problem when upgrading to the newest 64bit kernel. After it runs for a couple of minutes I get a kernel panic (see below). The previous kernel-2.6.32-131.21.1 reported the nouveau scaling lines but does not ke

Re: cracklib dependency problem

On 01/13/2012 08:16 AM, Eve V. E. Kovacs wrote: I am getting the following error when yum tries to do the nightly update on an SL6 system: Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/locale/hi/LC_MESSAGES/cracklib.mo conflicts between attempted installs of cracklib-2.8.16-2.el6.i686 and cracklib-2.

RE: kernel panic with 2.6.32-220.2.1

-Original message- From: Bill Maidment Sent: Fri 13-01-2012 10:48 Subject:kernel panic with 2.6.32-220.2.1 To: scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov; > Good Morning all from Australia > I have a problem when upgrading to the newest 64bit kernel. After it runs for > a > couple

Re: Unsubscribing

I note that in your previous messages that you were having problems due to MX records misdirecting your unsubscription e-mail. Try using lists...@smtp.fnal.gov as an alternate address. In a pinch, try "'listserv@[131.225.105.28]'" or "'listserv@[131.225.111.29]'" (without the double quotes. Actu

kernel panic with 2.6.32-220.2.1

Good Morning all from Australia I have a problem when upgrading to the newest 64bit kernel. After it runs for a couple of minutes I get a kernel panic (see below). The previous kernel-2.6.32-131.21.1 reported the nouveau scaling lines but does not kernel panic. Has anyone else seen anything like

cracklib dependency problem

I am getting the following error when yum tries to do the nightly update on an SL6 system: Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/locale/hi/LC_MESSAGES/cracklib.mo conflicts between attempted installs of cracklib-2.8.16-2.el6.i686 and cracklib-2.8.16-4.el6.x86_64 file /usr/share/locale/zh

Re: Unsubscribing

I note that in your previous messages that you were having problems due to MX records misdirecting your unsubscription e-mail. Try using lists...@smtp.fnal.gov as an alternate address. In a pinch, try "'listserv@[131.225.105.28]'" or "'listserv@[131.225.111.29]'" (without the double quotes. Actu

Re: Unsubscribing

On 01/12/2012 09:45 PM, Always Learning wrote: > On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 21:31 +, g wrote: > >> like your "pin name", 'always learning'. > > Hopefully until the minute I die, I will continue to learn new things. -=- may you be so blessed. > How does that help me understand the apparent contra

Re: Unsubscribing

On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 21:31 +, g wrote: > like your "pin name", 'always learning'. Hopefully until the minute I die, I will continue to learn new things. > this is what i received when i first joined Scientific Linux email lists. > > note second paragraph. How does that help me understan

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] error on yum update sl 6.1

Hi Pat Riehecky! On 2012.01.12 at 13:34:32 -0600, Pat Riehecky wrote next: > The IPA packages recently released are the ones which came out as > security updates along with TUV's 6.2 release. The current 6.2 BETA > has those packages integrated. So, to answer your question, SL 6.2 > will ship

Re: Unsubscribing

On 01/12/2012 07:45 PM, Always Learning wrote: <> like your "pin name", 'always learning'. this is what i received when i first joined Scientific Linux email lists. note second paragraph. +++ Your subscription to the SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-ANNOUNCE list (Announcements concerning Scientific Linux)

Unsubscribing

Hallo, I wanted to unsubscribe from the list. I looked at the headers of the most recently received email and saw:- List-Help: , List-Unsubscr

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] error on yum update sl 6.1

The IPA packages recently released are the ones which came out as security updates along with TUV's 6.2 release. The current 6.2 BETA has those packages integrated. So, to answer your question, SL 6.2 will ship by default with these IPA packages available and not any earlier versions. Thus,

error on yum update sl 6.1

hi, when trying to patch a sl 6.1 installation with ipa-server I get this error: Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package 389-ds-base.i686 0:1.2.8.2-1.el6 will be updated ---> Package 389-ds-base.i686 0:1.2.9.14-1.el6 will be an update ---> Packa

Re: XFS stack overflow

I was able to compile a test kernel successfully with the options given. Is there a way to verify that the size of the kernel stack is now 16K? On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Oleg Sadov wrote: > В Птн, 23/12/2011 в 09:24 -0500, Ryan C. England пишет: > > Thanks again for the assistance. > >

Re: WARNING from latest SL6 kernel?

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote: > Hello everybody. > > After updating from kernel-2.6.32-131.21.1.el6.x86_64 to current > kernel-2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64 on SL6.1 system and rebooting, I got > following warning few minutes after system boot: > > [ cut here ]-

WARNING from latest SL6 kernel?

Hello everybody. After updating from kernel-2.6.32-131.21.1.el6.x86_64 to current kernel-2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64 on SL6.1 system and rebooting, I got following warning few minutes after system boot: [ cut here ] WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:5914 thread_return+0x232/0x79d()