Re: [scikit-learn] Sprint discussion points?

2019-02-20 Thread Alexandre Gramfort
we should also see if we can have a lot of CI machines for the 5 days as it's always the blocker to move fast during 1 week. my 2c Alex On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 7:35 AM Roman Yurchak via scikit-learn wrote: > > Thanks for putting the draft schedule together! > > Personally I will be there 3 days

Re: [scikit-learn] VOTE: scikit-learn governance document

2019-02-20 Thread Olivier Grisel
+1 ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

Re: [scikit-learn] Sprint discussion points?

2019-02-20 Thread Andreas Mueller
Thanks for bringing that up. Did I email travis last time? We should also follow up with Microsoft as they promised unlimited builds... On 2/20/19 3:48 AM, Alexandre Gramfort wrote: we should also see if we can have a lot of CI machines for the 5 days as it's always the blocker to move fast du

Re: [scikit-learn] Sprint discussion points?

2019-02-20 Thread Andreas Mueller
Sure, we can change it up on Tuesday. I agree having things that we can implement during the week would be good. I was actually kind of optimistic and was hoping we could make some dent into the freezing, and the convergence issues might be less controversial and more a technical challenge. I

Re: [scikit-learn] Sprint discussion points?

2019-02-20 Thread Guillaume LemaƮtre
@Andy You were the one contacting Travis. On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 17:23, Andreas Mueller wrote: > Thanks for bringing that up. > Did I email travis last time? > > We should also follow up with Microsoft as they promised unlimited > builds... > > > On 2/20/19 3:48 AM, Alexandre Gramfort wrote: > >

Re: [scikit-learn] Sprint discussion points?

2019-02-20 Thread Andreas Mueller
I messaged them and also tasks Thomas Fan with working with Microsoft to set up azure pipelines. On 2/20/19 12:12 PM, Guillaume LemaƮtre wrote: @Andy You were the one contacting Travis. On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 17:23, Andreas Mueller > wrote: Thanks for bringing th

Re: [scikit-learn] VOTE: scikit-learn governance document

2019-02-20 Thread Satrajit Ghosh
+1 cheers, satra ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

Re: [scikit-learn] Sprint discussion points?

2019-02-20 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 06:16:20PM -0500, Andreas Mueller wrote: > I put a draft schedule here: > https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/wiki/Upcoming-events#technical-discussions-schedule I'd like to discuss sample_props. They are important to me. Should I add them somewhere on the schedul

Re: [scikit-learn] Sprint discussion points?

2019-02-20 Thread Andreas Mueller
On 2/20/19 4:40 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 06:16:20PM -0500, Andreas Mueller wrote: I put a draft schedule here: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/wiki/Upcoming-events#technical-discussions-schedule I'd like to discuss sample_props. They are important to me.

Re: [scikit-learn] Sprint discussion points?

2019-02-20 Thread Joel Nothman
@Hanmin are there particular conversations you are keen to take part in, and particular times that suit you? On Thu., 21 Feb. 2019, 9:13 am Andreas Mueller, wrote: > > > On 2/20/19 4:40 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 06:16:20PM -0500, Andreas Mueller wrote: > >> I put a d