On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 06:16:20PM -0500, Andreas Mueller wrote: > I put a draft schedule here: > https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/wiki/Upcoming-events#technical-discussions-schedule
I'd like to discuss sample_props. They are important to me. Should I add them somewhere on the schedule? Maybe in a place where people who care about them (AFAIK Joel and Alex also do) are available? Gaël > it's obviously somewhat opinionated ;) > Happy to reprioritize. > Basically I wouldn't like to miss any of the big API discussions because > coming > late to the party. > The two things on (grid?) searches are somewhat related: one is about > specifying search-spaces, the other about executing a given search space > efficiently. They probably warrant separate discussions. > I haven't added plotting or sample props on it, which are maybe two other > discussion points. > I tried to cover most controversial things from the roadmap. > Not sure if discussing the schedule via the mailing list is the best way? > Don't > want to create even more traffic than I already am ;) > On 2/19/19 5:48 PM, Guillaume Lemaître wrote: > > Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule, given that he seems > to be running the show? > Mostly running behind the show ... > For the moment, we only have a 30 minutes presentation of introduction > planned on Monday. > For the rest of the week, this is pretty much opened and I think that we > can propose a schedule such that we can be efficient. > IMO, two meetings of an hour per day look good to me. > Shall we prioritize the list of the issues? Maybe that some issues could > be > packed together. > I would not be against having a rough schedule on the wiki directly and I > think that having it before Monday could be better. > Let me know how I can help. > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 22:23, Andreas Mueller <t3k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, sounds good. > I didn't want to unilaterally post a schedule, but doing some google > form or similar seems a bit heavy-handed? > Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule, given that he > seems > to be running the show? > On 2/19/19 4:17 PM, Joel Nothman wrote: > I don't think optics requires a large meeting, just a few people. > I'm happy with your proposal generally, Andy. Do we schedule > specific topics at this point? > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn -- Gael Varoquaux Senior Researcher, INRIA Parietal NeuroSpin/CEA Saclay , Bat 145, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette France Phone: ++ 33-1-69-08-79-68 http://gael-varoquaux.info http://twitter.com/GaelVaroquaux _______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
