Sure, we can change it up on Tuesday.
I agree having things that we can implement during the week would be good.
I was actually kind of optimistic and was hoping we could make some dent
into the freezing,
and the convergence issues might be less controversial and more a
technical challenge.
I would like to be part of the fit_transform discussion but I don't have
to be.
Certainly I would want to discuss the grid-search stuff with Joel being
present.
On 2/20/19 1:33 AM, Roman Yurchak via scikit-learn wrote:
Thanks for putting the draft schedule together!
Personally I will be there 3 days out of 5 and wouldn't want to miss the
discussion on euclidean distance issues. Maybe we could adjust the
schedule during the sprint (say on Tuesday) based on people's interest
and availability? That might be easier than trying to figure it out for
29 participants over email..
Also IMO it would makes sense to have some discussions (that are not
that controversial or about high level API but still useful) earlier
during the week to be able to work on them during the sprint.
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
