Re: [Scons-dev] New SCons doc toolchain...

2013-05-10 Thread Gour
On Fri, 10 May 2013 18:49:58 +0200 Dirk Bächle wrote: > Which raises the question whether you selected this signature on > purpose, or it's a pure coincidence. ;) I swear it's pure coincidence generated by: 'gita fortune', but, of course, nothing happens by accident. ;) Sincerely, Gour --

Re: [Scons-dev] New SCons doc toolchain...

2013-05-10 Thread Dirk Bächle
On 10.05.2013 11:15, Gour wrote: On Thu, 09 May 2013 23:55:02 +0200 Dirk Bächle wrote: that's okay...but to make me believe this as well, you (or someone else) has to deliver actual results. ;) [...] Being a little lazy and more tight with the time atm, here I provide some reference which doe

Re: [Scons-dev] New SCons doc toolchain...

2013-05-10 Thread Gour
On Thu, 09 May 2013 23:55:02 +0200 Dirk Bächle wrote: > that's okay...but to make me believe this as well, you (or someone > else) has to deliver actual results. ;) > As I stated before in this thread, as long as the same functionality > is kept regarding the automatic creation of examples (and

Re: [Scons-dev] New SCons doc toolchain...

2013-05-10 Thread Gour
On Fri, 10 May 2013 09:10:44 +0100 Russel Winder wrote: > On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 23:53 +0200, Gour wrote: > […] > > Once again, kudos to Dirk for his work on the doc toolchain which > > is often thankless job. > […] > > Hear, hear. > > Whilst I am a hater of humans having to read and write XML,

Re: [Scons-dev] New SCons doc toolchain...

2013-05-10 Thread Russel Winder
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 23:53 +0200, Gour wrote: […] > Once again, kudos to Dirk for his work on the doc toolchain which is often > thankless job. […] Hear, hear. Whilst I am a hater of humans having to read and write XML, even DocBook/XML, rationalizing the SCons use of DocBook/XML is a good step