Expanding on Russel's comment, the SCons project is a broad church that
nominally supports a very large number of languages. I think old issues
reflect the relative interest from the comminity for supporting a
particular language and/or feature of SCons (e.g. people care a lot more
about continued
O.k.
I'll try to get this setup this weekend.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:47 AM Russel Winder wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 11:44 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote:
> > On one hand dropping the number of open bugs will have significant
> > appearance/PR improvements.
> > (I've seen comments saying 600+
On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 11:44 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote:
> On one hand dropping the number of open bugs will have significant
> appearance/PR improvements.
> (I've seen comments saying 600+ bugs outstanding the project must not be
> still alive).
I'd say having a lot of open bugs in a project that
On one hand dropping the number of open bugs will have significant
appearance/PR improvements.
(I've seen comments saying 600+ bugs outstanding the project must not be
still alive).
But dropping 620 of 680 bugs because they're stale, but possibly still
unresolved issues probably isn't the best.
That makes sense, Mats. Thanks for the additional insight.
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019, 10:30 Mats Wichmann wrote:
> On 9/2/19 8:03 AM, Jonathon Reinhart wrote:
> > Note that you can subscribe to a GitHub issue without commenting. This
> > is preferred as it avoids spamming all currently-subscribed
On 9/2/19 8:03 AM, Jonathon Reinhart wrote:
> Note that you can subscribe to a GitHub issue without commenting. This
> is preferred as it avoids spamming all currently-subscribed users.
>
> Also, I think mass/automated bug closing needs to be done very
> conservatively. Closing an issue doesn't
Note that you can subscribe to a GitHub issue without commenting. This is
preferred as it avoids spamming all currently-subscribed users.
Also, I think mass/automated bug closing needs to be done very
conservatively. Closing an issue doesn't make the bug go away. There are
projects that have bots
Dirk,
If you can create a HTML dump, I can put it up on the scons.org webserver
and link to it.
And then maybe we create a repo to check in all the source files with
scripts to regen?
-Bill
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 5:09 AM Dirk Bächle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this approach sounds good to me too. I
Hi,
this approach sounds good to me too. I just wanted to mention that I have all
the old Tigris Issues (and user and developer mails)
archived on my local machine. They're stored in a simple text-ish format that
can be read into corresponding Python classes.
My plan is still to write a small
I think this would be great. I'll help review the bugs-to-be-closed.
-- Gary
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:50 AM Mats Wichmann wrote:
>
> Just to pull some thoughts together:
>
> there are currently 679 open scons issues on github.
>
> That number drops to 92 if you select only ones which have had
Just to pull some thoughts together:
there are currently 679 open scons issues on github.
That number drops to 92 if you select only ones which have had a
modification since the big migration from tigris. Try this query:
is:issue is:open updated:>=2018-02-10
or as a link:
11 matches
Mail list logo
